Gender Differences: The Role of Nature, Nurture, Social Identity and Self-organization
This paper describes an agent-based model to investigate the origins of gender differences in social status. The agents’ basic behaviour is modelled according to Kemper’s sociological status-power theory. Differences in the socializing forces of the surrounding society are modelled using Hofstede’s dimensions of culture. Particulars of play behaviour are modelled using experimental child development studies from various cultures. The resulting model is presented and discussed. Social identity as a group of either non-gendered children, boys, or girls, seems a powerful force, multiplying the effect of biological differences. The model is actually general enough to be applicable to a wide range of social behaviours with minimal changes.
KeywordsAgent-based model Gender Aggression Rough-and-tumble Social identity Status-power theory Culture Self-organisation Emergence
The authors are grateful to NIAS, Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences, for offering a fellowship enabling the present study. The support of the Lorentz Center in Leiden is also acknowledged. Discussions with Theodore D. Kemper have been most valuable.
- 7.Eliot, L.: Pink Brain, Blue Brain How Small Differences Grow into Troublesome Gaps-And What We Can Do About It, p. 420. Mariner Books, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
- 10.Hemelrijk, C.K.: Simple reactions to nearby neighbors and complex social behavior in primates. In: Menzel, R.F.J. (ed.) Animal Thinking: Comparative Issues in Comparative Cognition, pp. 223–238. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)Google Scholar
- 11.Hemelrijk, C.K.: The use of artificial-life models for the study of social organization. In: Thierry, B., Singh, M., Kaumanns, W. (eds.) Macaque Societies, pp. 295–313. A Model for the Study of Social Organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
- 13.Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Minkov, M.: Cultures and Organizations. Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill, New York (2010)Google Scholar
- 15.Hofstede, G.J.: Theory in social simulation: status-power theory, national culture and emergence of the glass ceiling. In: Social Coordination: Principles, Artefacts, and Theories, pp. 21–28. AISB, Exeter (2013)Google Scholar
- 19.Kemper, T.D.: Status, Power and Ritual Interaction: A Relational Reading of Durkheim. Goffman and Collins. Ashgate, Burlington (2011)Google Scholar
- 20.Lansu, T.: Implicit processes in peer relations: effects of popularity and aggression. Nijmegen University (2012)Google Scholar
- 24.Parke, R.D., Slaby, R.G.: The development of aggression. In: Mussen, P.H. (ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology, vol. 4, pp. 547–641. Wiley, New York (1983)Google Scholar
- 26.Pellegrini, A.D.: School Recess and Playground Behavior: Educational and Developmental Roles. SUNY Press, Albany (1995)Google Scholar
- 28.Tajfel, H.: Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
- 29.Thorne, B.: Gender Play. Girls and Boys in School. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick (1993)Google Scholar