Skip to main content

Data Analysis of Social Simulations Outputs - Interpreting the Dispersion of Variables

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1971 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9002))

Abstract

In the domain of social simulation, there are very few papers reporting on the statistical analysis of simulation results, while it is very common in empirical social sciences. The paper advocates the recourse to the statistical analysis of social simulation outputs, as a very efficient way to improve the interpretation of simulation results and so the understanding of the system that is the model’s target. This is illustrated by the study of a simulation model designed to analyze a real case regarding the management of a river in South West of France. Several standard statistics methods are used to shed light on the possible outcomes of the debate between the stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://soclabproject.wordpress.com.

  2. 2.

    SocLab allows resources to be controlled by several actors but, from the social point of view, each one is the unique performer of his own behavior.

  3. 3.

    Literally “Syndicat Intercommunal d’Aménagement Hydraulique” of the Touch river. It is entrusted by the State with the maintenance of the river for the sake of the riparian proprietors, which own the bank and the bed of the river. See http://www.siah-du-touch.org for more details.

  4. 4.

    See also http://www.nathalievilla.org/soclab.html.

  5. 5.

    The cleverness of actors in the SocLab model is not in question since each of them applies the same learning algorithm to select the state of the resource it controls. The difference in capability of actors results from their constraints to obtain a good level of satisfaction.

References

  1. Alexopoulos, C., Kim, S.: Output data analysis for simulations. In: Yücesan, E., Chen, C., Snowdon, J., Charnes, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Winter Simulation Conference (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashby, W.: Principles of self-organizing systems. In: von Foerster, H., Zopf Jr., G.W. (eds.) Principles of Self-organization, pp. 255–257. Pergamon Press, London (1962). http://csis.pace.edu/~marchese/CS396x/Computing/Ashby.pdf

  3. Axelrod, R.: Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., Terna, P. (eds.) Simulating Social Phenomena. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical System, pp. 21–40. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Baldet, B.: Gérer la rivière ou la crue? Le gouvernement du risque d’inondation entre enjeux localisés et approche instrumentée. Le cas de la vallée du Touch en Haute-Garonne. Ph.D thesis (Sociology), Université de Toulouse, 26th June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boero, R., Squazzoni, F.: Does empirical embeddedness matter? Methodological issues on agent-based models for analytical social science. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 8(4), 6 (2005). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/6.html

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crozier, M., Friedberg, E.: Actors and Systems. The Politics of Collective Action. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  7. El Gemayel, J., Chapron, P., Adreit, F., Sibertin-Blanc, C.: Quand et comment les acteurs sociaux peuvent-ils coopérer? un algorithme de simulation pour la négociation de leurs comportement. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle 25(1), 43–67 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, A., Heppenstall, A., Birkin, M.: Chapter 9: Understanding simulation results. In: Simulating Social Complexity, Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.: Simulation for the Social Scientist. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Law, A.: Statistical analysis of simulation output data: the practical state of the art. In: Johansson, B., Jain, S., Montoya-Torres, J., Hugan, J., Yücesan, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Winter Simulation Conference (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Law, A.: Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 5th edn. Law, A.M., Tucson (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lorscheid, I., Bernd-Oliver, H., Meyer, M.: Opening the ‘black box’ of simulations: increased transparency and effective communication through the systematic design of experiments. Comput. Math. Org. Theory 18(1), 22–62 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorscheid, I., Meyer, M., Hocke, S.: Simulation model and data analysis: Where are we and where should we go? In: Proceedings of ESSA 2013 Conference, Warsaw, Poland, pp. 10–16, September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murdoch, D., Chow, E.: A graphical display of large correlation matrices. Am. Stat. 50, 178–180 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Radax, W., Rengs, B.: Prospects and pitfalls of statistical testing: insights from replicating the demographic prisoner’s dilemma. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 13(4), 1 (2010). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/13/4/1.html

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sibertin-Blanc, C., El Gemayel, J.: Boundedly rational agents playing the social actors game - How to reach cooperation? In: Raghavan, V. (ed.) Proceeding of IEEE Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE, Atlanta (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sibertin-Blanc, C., Roggero, P., Adreit, F., Baldet, B., Chapron, P., El Gemayel, J., Mailliard, M., Sandri, S.: Soclab: a framework for the modelling, simulation and analysis of power in social organizations. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 16(4), 8 (2013). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/4/8.html

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sibertin-Blanc, C., Roggero, P., Baldet, B.: Interplay between stakeholders of the management of a river. In: CoMSES, Computational Model Library (2013). http://www.openabm.org/model/3760, it gives an extensive presentation of the case and the model

  19. Simon, H.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69(1), 99–118 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Villa-Vialaneix, N., Sibertin-Blanc, C., Roggero, P.: Statistical exploratory analysis of agent-based simulations in a social context. Case Stud. Bus. Ind. Gov. Stat. 5(2), 132–149 (2014). http://publications-sfds.fr/index.php/csbigs/article/view/223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Sibertin-Blanc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sibertin-Blanc, C., Villa-Vialaneix, N. (2015). Data Analysis of Social Simulations Outputs - Interpreting the Dispersion of Variables. In: Grimaldo, F., Norling, E. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation XV. MABS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9002. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14627-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14627-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14626-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14627-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics