It has been widely acknowledged that effective strategizing in today’s competitive environment has become a challenging task and thus requires a deliberate approach. This has also driven calls for a greater cross-fertilization of the field with other disciplines. In particular, good practices from architecture management may be considered a promising means to provide strategists with a reasonable structure and orientation for developing the business motivation (including, e.g., goals, strategies, and principles). Against this background, this chapter illustrates the use of architectural thinking in strategy development. Based on a fictitious case study, it explains how the use of an architectural approach that provides a clear structure can help achieve higher consistency, effectiveness, completeness, and comprehensibility.
- Project Team
- Chief Executive Officer
- Strategic Choice
- Enterprise Architecture
- Swot Analysis
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Note that these strategies are formulated in a “gap-like” way to emphasize the new aspects. They may well be part of a “larger” (e.g., the overall product strategy) or more generic strategy (e.g., product leadership). They are not yet meant to represent strategic programs or even projects though (cf. Yelin 2005). In contrast, they should be considered less specific than an action plan (that includes decisions with respect to, for example, the “who” and “when”). In line with the strategy definition provided in Chap. 1, they represent the “conception preceding action” (Mintzberg 1987).
Note that such deficiencies may not necessarily be addressed at the strategic level, but may also be possible to be resolved at the lower levels of the business architecture without a strategy defined for this purpose.
Business Model Foundry (2013) The value proposition canvas. http://www.businessmodelgeneration.com/canvas/vpc. Accessed 22 Sept 2014
El Sawy OA, Pereira F (2013) Digital business models: review and synthesis. In: El Sawy OA, Pereira F (eds) Business modelling in the dynamic digital space: an ecosystem approach. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–20
Graves T (2012) The enterprise as story: the role of narrative in enterprise architecture. Tetradian Books, Colchester
ISACA (2012) COBIT 5 – a business framework for the governance and management of enterprise IT. http://www.isaca.org/COBIT/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 22 Sept 2014
Jonkers H, Band I, Quartel D (2012) ArchiSurance case study. The Open Group, San Francisco, CA
Jungk R, Müllert NR (1981) Zukunftswerkstätten. Wilhelm Goldmann, Hamburg
Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001) The strategy-focused organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard School Business Press, Boston
Kim WC, Mauborgne R (2005) Blue ocean strategy: how to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Martin RL (2014) The big lie of strategic planning. Harv Bus Rev 92(1/2):79–84
Mintzberg H (1987) The strategy concept I: five Ps for strategy. Calif Manage Rev 30(1):11–24
Mintzberg H, Ahlstrand B, Lampel J (2005) Strategy safari—a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. The Free Press, New York
OMG (2010) The business motivation model, version 1.1. Object Management Group, Needham, MA
Radeke F, Legner C (2012) Embedding EAM into strategic planning. In: Ahlemann F, Stettiner E, Messerschmidt M, Legner C (eds) Strategic enterprise architecture management – challenges, best practices, and future developments. Springer, Berlin, pp 111–139
Simon D, Fischbach K, Schoder D (2014) Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management. Inf Syst e-Bus Manag 12(1):5–42
The Open Group (2011) TOGAF® version 9.1. Van Haren, Zaltbommel
The Open Group (2013) ArchiMate® 2.1 specification. Van Haren, Zaltbommel
Ulrich W, Rosen M (2011) The business capability map: the “rosetta stone” of business/IT alignment. The enterprise architecture advisory service executive report 14(2), Cutter Consortium, Arlington, TX
Wilson C (2007) Transforming business architecture: creating a common language between business and IT. Align J (January/February):62–67
Yelin KC (2005) Linking strategy and project portfolio management. In: Levine HA (ed) Project portfolio management: a practical guide to selecting projects, managing portfolios, and maximizing benefits. Jossey-Bass, New Jersey
Zachman J (1997) Enterprise architecture: the issue of the century. Database Program Des 10(3):44–53
Editors and Affiliations
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simon, D. (2015). An Architectural Approach to Strategizing: Structure and Orientation for Developing the Business Motivation. In: Simon, D., Schmidt, C. (eds) Business Architecture Management. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14571-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14570-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14571-6