Abstract
With the boost of urbanization and industrialization, the soil toxicity by heavy metals and other inorganic and/or organic pollutants has become a major environmental issue. Considerable efforts are being made for developing an efficient and sustainable technology for soil remediation and improving the soil fertility. Soil bioremediation by using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) may prove to be a promising cost-effective and eco-friendly technology. Application of PGPR must be precise in terms of selection of rhizobacterial strains, soil conditions, crop, and other environmental properties to attain the maximum results. Moreover, prior evaluation of in vitro plant growth promontory traits and other biochemical properties expressed by PGPR strains needs to be determined in laboratory before field trial. This review deals with various methods for PGPR detection and characterization with a focus on comparative evaluation of conventional versus recent techniques of PGPR detection/characterization. Their on-field application, mechanism of action, strengths, drawbacks with current opportunities, and economic feasibility in this area of research have been integrated in this study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agrawal R, Satlewal A, Chaudhary M, Verma A, Singh R, Verma AK, Kumar R, Singh KP (2012) Rapid detection of cadmium-resistant plant growth promotory c: a perspective of ELISA and QCM-based immunosensor. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22(6):849–855
Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1978) Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–221
Atlas RM, Bartha R (1993) Microbial ecology: historical development in microbial ecology, fundamentals and applications. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, Redwood City, CA, pp 3–20
Bååth E, Arnebrant K (1994) Soil Biol Biochem 26(8):995–1001
Bakken LR, Olsen RA (1989) Soil Biol Biochem 21:789
Barr JG, Emmerson AM, Hogg GM, Smyth E (1989) API-20NE and sensititre autoidentification systems for identifying Pseudomonas spp. J Clin Pathol 42:1113–1114
Bashan J, Holguin G (1998) Soil Biol Biochem 30(8/9):1225–1228
Bhattacharya S, Jang J, Yang L, Akin D, Bashir R (2007) Biomems and nanotechnology-based approaches for rapid detection of biological entities. J Rapid Meth Autom Microbiol 15:1–32
Campbell R, Greaves MP (1990) Anatomy and community structure of the rhizosphere. In: Lynch JM (ed) The rhizosphere. Wiley, Essex, pp 11–34
Carter RM, Mekalanos JJ, Jacobs MB, Lubrano GJ, Guilbault GG (1995) Quartz crystal microbalance detection of Vibrio cholerae O139 serotype. J Immunol Methods 187:121–125
Cerritos R, Vinuesa P, Eguiarte LE, Herrera-Estrella L, Alcaraz-Peraza LD, Arvizu-Go´mez JL, Olmedo G, Ramirez E, Siefert JL, Souza V (2008) Bacillus coahuilensis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic species from a desiccation lagoon in the Cuatro Cie´negas Valley in Coahuila, Mexico. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:919–923
Choudhary MK, Agrawal R, Kumar R, Singh P, Gupta BRK, Singh KP (2010) Detection of cadmium-resistant rhizobacteria using piezoelectric nanobiosensor. Int J Nanosci 9:461–469
Collins MD, Jones D (1981) Distribution of isoprenoid quinine structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implications. Microbiol Rev 45:316–354
De Boer E, Beumer RR (1999) Methodology for detection and typing of foodborne microorganisms. Int J Food Microbiol 50:119–130
Depret G, Laguerre G (2008) Plant phenology and genetic variability in root and nodule development strongly influence genetic structuring of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae populations nodulating pea. New Phytol 179:224–235
do Vale Barreto Figueiredo M, Seldin L, Fernando de Araujo F, de Lima Ramos Mariano R (2010) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: fundamentals and applications. Plant growth and health promoting bacteria. Microbiol Monogr 18, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13612-2_2, http://www.springer.com/978-3-642-13611-5
Dufrêne YF (2002) Atomic force microscopy, a powerful tool in microbiology. J Bacteriol 184:5205–5213
Eiland F (1983) Soil Biol Biochem 15:665–670
Enebak SA, Wei G, Kloepper JW (1997) Forest Sci 44:139–144
EPA 542/F-06/013 (2006) In situ treatment technologies for contaminated soil, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5203P, EPA 542/F-06/013, Nov 2006. www.epa.gov/tio/tsp
Epstein CB, Butow RA (2000) Microarray technology – enhanced versatility persistent challenge. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11:36–41
Graham TW, Sabelnikov AG (2004) How much is enough: real-time detection and identification of biological weapon agents. J Homeland Sec Emerg Manag 1:1–13
Gray EJ, Smith DL (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 37:395–412
Head IM, Saunders JR, Pickup RW (1998) Microb Ecol 35:1–21
Helfinstine SL, Lavrentovich OD, Woolverton CJ (2006) Lyotropic liquid crystal as a real-time detector of microbial immune complexes. Lett Appl Microbiol 43:27–32
Hopkins DW, Macnaughton SJ, O'Donnell AG (1991) Soil Biol Biochem 23:217
Jacobs MBR, Cater M, Lubrano GJ, Guilbault GG (1995) A piezoelectric biosensor for Listeria monocytogenes. Am Lab 27:26–28
Karunakaran C, Jayas DS (2005) Nanotechnology – an emerging technology for use in agricultural and food research. Proceedings of the CSAE/SCGR, paper no. 05–001
Kua CH, Lam YC, Yang C, Toumi KY (2005) Review of bio-particle manipulation using dielectrophoresis. Report on innovation in manufacturing systems and technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7464. Accessed 15 Jan 2005
Kumar A (2000) http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0010/Kumar/Kumar-0010.htmc
Lee DY, Lauder H, Cruwys H, Falletta P, Beaudette LA (2008) Development and application of an oligonucleotide microarray and real-time quantitative PCR for detection of wastewater bacterial pathogens. Sci Total Environ 398:203–211
Lemarchand K, Masson L, Brousseau R (2004) Molecular biology and DNA microarray technology for microbial quality monitoring of water. Crit Rev Microbiol 30:145–172
Logan NA, Berkeley RCW (1984) Identification of Bacillus strains using the API system. J Gen Microbiol 130:1871–1882
Logan NA, Berge O, Bishop AH, Busse HJ, De Vos P, Fritze D, Heyndrickx M, Kampfer P, Rabinovitch L, Salkinoja-Salonen MS, Seldin L, Ventosa A (2009) Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of aerobic, endospore-forming bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59(8):2114–2121
Lucas GarcÃa JA, Domenech J, SantamarÃa C, Camacho M, Daza A, Gutiérrez Mañero FJ (2004) Environ Exp Bot 52(3):239–251
Mannheimer CA (1999) An overview of chemotaxonomy, and its role in creating a phylogenetic classification system. Agricola 87–90
Masters CI, Shallcross JA, Mackey BM (1994) Effect of stress treatments on the detection of Listeria monocytogenes and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by the polymerase chain reaction. J Appl Bacteriol 77:73–79
Miller JM, Rhoden DL (1991) Preliminary evaluation of Biolog, a carbon source utilization method for bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol 29:1143–1147
Monteiro JM, Vollú RE, Coelho MRR, Alviano CS, Blank AF, Seldin L (2009) Culture-dependent and -independent approaches to analyze the bacterial community of different genotypes of Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty (vetiver) rhizospheres. J Microbiol 47:363–370
Montinaro S, Concas A, Pisu M, Cao G (2012) Remediation of heavy metals contaminated soils by ball milling. Chem Eng Trans 28
Mota FF, Gomes EA, Paiva E, Seldin L (2005) Assessment of the diversity of Paenibacillus species in environmental samples by a novel rpoB-based PCR-DGGE method. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:317–328
Muramatsu H, Kajiwara K, Tamiya E, Karube I (1986) Piezoelectric immunosensor for the detection of Candida albicans microbes. Anal Chem Acta 188:257–261
Pires MN, Seldin L (1997) Evaluation of Biolog system for identification of strains of Paenibacillus azotofixans. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 71:195–200
Ramos Solano B, Pereyra de la Iglesia MT, Probanza A, Lucas GarcÃa JA, MegÃas M, Gutiérrez Mañero FJ (2007) Plant Soil 287:59–68
Ramos B, Lucas GarcÃa JA, Probanza A, Barrientos ML, Gutiérrez Mañero FJ (2003) Environ Exp Bot 49:61–68
Reichardt W, Briones A, de Jesus R, Padre B (2001) Appl Soil Ecol 17:151–163
RodrÃguez-DÃaz M, Rodelas B, Pozo C, MartÃnez-Toledo MV, González-López J (2008) A review on the taxonomy and possible screening traits of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Ahmad I, Pichtel J, Hayat S (eds) Plant-bacteria interactions: strategies and techniques to promote plant growth. Wiley, Weinheim
Schleifer KH, Kandler O (1972) Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 36:407–477
Seldin L, Penido EGC (1986) Identification of Bacillus azotofixans using API tests. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 52:403–409
Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Quality Institute, United States (2000) Soil Quality – Urban Technical Note No. 3, heavy metal soil contamination. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Quality Institute, United States
Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM (1994) Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:846–849
Stackebrandt E, Liesack W (1993) Nucleic acids and classification. In: Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG (eds) Handbook of new bacterial systematics. Academic, London, pp 151–194
Su XD, Li SFY, Kwang J, Low S (2000) Piezoelectric quartz crystal based screening test for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection in pigs. Analyst 125:725–730
Suzuki K, Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG (1993) Cell envelopes and classification. In: Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG (eds) Handbook of new bacterial systematics. Academic, London, pp 195–250
Tang JC, Wang RG, Niu XW, Wang M, Chu HR, Zhou QX (2010) Characterisation of the rhizoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil: effect of different influencing factors. Biogeosciences 7:3961–3969
Tunlid A, White DC (1992) Biochemical analysis of biomass community structure, nutritional status, and metabolic activity of microbial communities in soil. In: Stotzky G, Bollag JM (eds) Soil biochemistry. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 229–262
van der Woude MW (2006) FEMS Microbiol Lett 254(2):190–197
Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) Soil Biol Biochem 19(6):703–707
Wang L-T, Lee F-L, Tai C-J, Kasai H (2007) Comparison of gyrB gene sequences, 16S rRNA gene sequences and DNA-DNA hybridization in the Bacillus subtilis group. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1846–1850
Xu M, Lu N (2012) Research on removing heavy metals from mine tailings. Disaster Adv 5:116–120
Yang H, An H, Feng G, Li Y (2005) Visualization and quantitative roughness analysis of peach skin by atomic force microscopy under storage. LWT Food Sci Technol 38:571–577
Yao Z, Li J, Xie H, Yu C (2012) Review on remediation technologies of soil contaminated by heavy metals. Procedia Environ Sci 16:722–729
Ye J, Letcher SV, Rand AG (1997) Piezoelectric biosensor for detection of Salmonella Typhimurium. J Food Sci 62:1067–1071
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agrawal, R., Satlewal, A., Varma, A. (2015). Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): A Perspective of Conventional Versus Recent Techniques. In: Sherameti, I., Varma, A. (eds) Heavy Metal Contamination of Soils. Soil Biology, vol 44. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14526-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14526-6_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14525-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14526-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)