Advertisement

Using ICTs to Facilitate Multilingual Mathematics Teaching and Learning

  • Paul Libbrecht
  • Leila Goosen
Part of the New ICMI Study Series book series (NISS)

Abstract

Many mathematics teachers and learners are living in a world where Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), including computers and mobile phones, are common: they are digital natives. Many devices of the information and communication technologies are also connected to the Internet, meaning that an unprecedented audience and unparalleled knowledge can both be reached: the world is connected far beyond language, country, or social boundaries. ICTs offer access to numerous online knowledge sources, several of which are multilingual. ICTs also connect a large number of learners to text discussions of mathematics. The community exposure or peer-to-peer nature of this communication allows it to use a language that is highly relevant for these learners and enables them to use their own language within a shared repertoire. Finally, ICTs support exploration of mathematical objects: they commonly transcend languages through the expressivity and interactivity of representations they offer to view and manipulate mathematical ideas. This chapter surveys research that studies such innovations in the ICT and mathematics education literature. It pinpoints the gap related to the scarcity of literature on the possibilities of using ICTs to facilitate multilingual mathematics teaching and learning. To this end, the first section reviews literature about ICTs for mathematics learning, identifying a few opportunities where the language diversity is considered. It then describes how multilingualism can affect tools of the ICTs for mathematics learning. Finally it describes a few tool types, which may support the teaching and learning of mathematics in multilingual environments.

Keywords

Mathematical Notation Computer Algebra System Learning Resource Home Language Multiple Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been partially funded by the first author’s individual affiliations and the European projects Math-Bridge and Open Discovery Space. The opinions represented herein are, however, the authors’. We thank the reviewers of this chapter, among others Philip Clarkson, for their constructive critiques.

References

  1. Banyard, P., Underwood, J., & Twiner, A. (2006). Do enhanced communication technologies inhibit or facilitate self-regulated learning? European Journal of Education, 41, 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaty, R., & Geiger, V. (2010). Technology, communication, and collaboration: Re-thinking communities of inquiry, learning, and practice. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 251–284). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, E. G. (2012). Is it adequate to model the socio-cultural dimension of e-learners by informing a fixed set of personal criteria? Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2012). Rome: IEEE.Google Scholar
  4. Borba, M., Clarkson, P. C., & Gadanidis, G. (2013). Learning with the use of the Internet. In M. A. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), The third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 691–720). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Caprotti, O., & Seppälä, M. (2006). Multilingual delivery of online tests in mathematics. In Proceedings of Online Educa, Berlin, Germany. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
  6. Clark, R., & Mayer, R. (2002). e-Learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  7. Dalvit, L., Thinyane, M., Muyingi, H., & Terzoli, A. (2007). The deployment of an e-commerce platform and related projects in a rural area in South Africa. International Journal of Computing and ICT Research, 1(1), 9–18.Google Scholar
  8. Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., & Mariotti, M. A. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 89–132). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Endrizzi, L. (2012). Les technologies numériques dans l’enseignement supérieur, entre défis et opportunités. Dossier d’actualité Veille et Analyses, n°78. Retrieved from http://ife.ens-lyon.fr/vst/DA/detailsDossier.php?dossier=78&lang=fr
  10. Fest, A. (2011). Adding intelligent assessment: A Java framework for integrating dynamic mathematical software components into interactive learning activities. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 43(3), 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hardman, J. (2005). An exploratory case study of computer use in a primary school mathematics classroom: New technology, new pedagogy? Perspectives in Education, 23(4), 1–13.Google Scholar
  12. Hearst, M. (2009). Search user interfaces. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hosfstaede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J.-B. (2010). Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kleiner, T. (2012). Technological challenges of the multilingual European society (Opening address at the META-FORUM 2012). Retrieved from http://www.meta-net.eu/events/meta-forum-2012/report#kleiner_presentation
  16. Kozma, R. B. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of ICT for education impact: A review. In D. A. Wagner, B. Day, T. James, R. B. Kozma, J. Miller, & T. Unwin (Eds.), Monitoring and evaluation of ICT in education projects: A handbook for developing countries (pp. 11–18). Washington, DC: InfoDev/World Bank.Google Scholar
  17. Libbrecht, P. (2010a). Customized and culturally enhanced rendering and search (Deliverable 4.1 of the Math-Bridge project). Retrieved from http://project.math-bridge.org/outcomes_deliverables.php
  18. Libbrecht, P. (2010b). Notations around the world: Census and exploitation. In S. Autexier, J. Calmet, D. Delahaye, P. D. F. Ion, L. Rideau, R. Rioboo & A. P. Sexton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Computer Mathematics: Vol. 6167. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 398–410). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Marcus, A. (2008). Global/Intercultural user-interface design. In A. Sears & J. A. Jacko (Eds.), Human computer interaction handbook. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Melis, E., Goguadze, G., Libbrecht, P., & Ullrich, C. (2009). Culturally aware mathematics education technology. In E. Blanchard & D. Allard (Eds.), Handbook of research on culturally-aware information technology: Perspectives and models (pp. 543–557). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  21. Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olive, J., Makar, K., Hoyos, V., Kee Kor, L., Kosheleva, O., & Sträßer, R. (2010). Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 89–132). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Peters, C., Braschler, M., & Clough, P. (2012). Multilingual information retrieval: From research to practice. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saludes, J., & Xambó, S. (2012). The GF mathematics library. In P. Quaresma & R.-J. Back (Eds.), Proceedings of the THedu’11 Workshop. EPTCS 79 (pp. 102–110).
  25. Setati, M., Molefe, T., & Langa, M. (2008). Using language as a transparent resource in the teaching and learning of mathematics in a grade 11 multilingual classroom. Pythagoras, 67, 14–25.Google Scholar
  26. Stewart, C. (2012). A cultural education model: Design and implementation of adaptive multimedia interfaces in eLearning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  27. Vosloo, S. (2012). Draft policy guidelines for mobile learning (version 2.1). Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO. Retrieved November, 2012, from http://www.unescobkk.org/id/news/article/inviting-public-input-on-the-unesco-policy-guidelines-on-mobile-learning/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.InformaticsWeingarten University of Education Kirchplatz 2WeingartenGermany
  2. 2.University of South AfricaJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations