Anthropological Perspectives

Chapter

Abstract

Anthropology in a broad sense can be defined as the study of diversity through time and across space. It comprises two main fields: biological anthropology, which deals with biological diversity, and sociocultural anthropology, which deals with sociocultural diversity. Table 1 compares the characteristics of both anthropological approaches. This chapter explores the second field.

References

  1. Cuche D (1996) La Notion de Culture dans les Sciences Sociales. La Découverte, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Herskovits M (1948) Man and his works. The science of cultural anthropology. A.A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Herskovits M (1955) Cultural relativism and cultural values. In: Herskovits M (ed) Cultural anthropology. A.A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Lévi-Strauss C (1952) Race and history. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Lévi-Strauss C (1963) Structural anthropology. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Macklin R (1999) Against relativism. Cultural diversity and the search for Ethical Universals in Medicine. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Massé R (2000) Les limites d’une approche essentialiste des ethnoéthiques: pour un relativisme éthique critique. Anthropologie et Sociétés 24(2):13–33Google Scholar
  9. Pike K (1954) Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Summer Institute of Linguistics, GlendaleGoogle Scholar
  10. Rubel A (1964) The epidemiology of a folk illness: Susto in Hispanic America. Ethnology 3:270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rubel A, O’Nell CW, Collado-Ardón R (1991 [1984]) Susto: a folk illness. University of California Press, Berkeley pp 112–120Google Scholar
  12. Simon J-P (1993) Ethnocentrisme. Pluriel-Recherches 1:57–63Google Scholar
  13. Sturzenegger O (1999) Le mauvais œil de la lune. Ethnomédecine créole en Amérique du Sud, Karthala, ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. Sumner W (1906) Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. Ginn and Co., Boston, p 13Google Scholar
  15. Tylor E (1871) Primitive culture. John Murray, London, p 1Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Cowan J, Dembour M-B, Wilson R (eds) (2001) Culture and rights: anthropological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Geertz C (1983) Local Knowledge. Further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Harris M, Johnson O (2000) Cultural anthropology, 5th edn. Allyn & BaconGoogle Scholar
  4. Kuper A (1999) Culture. The anthropologist’s account. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Malinowski B (1944) A scientific theory of culture and others essays. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  6. Maquet J (1964) Objectivity in anthropology. Curr Anthropol 5:47–55Google Scholar
  7. Massé R (2003) Valeurs universelles et relativisme culturel en recherche internationale: les contributions d’un principisme sensible aux contextes socioculturels. Autrepart 28:21–35Google Scholar
  8. Shweder RA, Levine RA (eds) (1984) Culture theory: essays on mind, self and emotion. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Sperber D (1985) On anthropological knowledge: three essays. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aix-Marseille UniversityAix-en-ProvenceFrance

Personalised recommendations