Advertisement

The Profiles of Aging

  • Suchit Arora
Chapter
  • 486 Downloads
Part of the International Perspectives on Aging book series (Int. Perspect. Aging, volume 12)

Abstract

Starting early in the adult life cycles, cohorts brought up since the early nineteenth century have traced unique profiles of non-communicable diseases, suggesting that the aging potentials across them had changed over the long term. This cross-generation or cross-cohort change seems to have been the main thrust of modern aging. However, the profiles tend to converge at advanced ages, suggesting that the progress at older ages is less than the progress at younger ones. Quantified in terms of the parameters α and β, and in terms of the mortality rate doubling times, the history of such profiles also has a prolonged episode in the nineteenth century, when about three to four successive generations fared worse than the ones before. In light of the evidence on cross-cohort aging, the chapter offers a synthesis of the opposing views in the debate on aging and its prospects. It also connects with the long-running debate on the trends in living standards during industrialization, outlining how the profiles do not always agree with the time at which the conventional measures indicate an improving or worsening standard.

Keywords

Cross-cohort aging Senescence Mortality rate doubling time Gompertz Period-life expectancy Compression of deaths Standard of living Capabilities Average stature 

References

  1. Costa, D. L. (2002). Changing chronic disease rates and the long-term declines in functional limitations among older men. Demography, 39(1), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Costa, D. L. (2003). Understanding the mid-life and older-age mortality declines: Evidence from the Union Army veterans. Journal of Econometrics, 112(1), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Finch, C. E. (1990). Longevity, senescence and the genome. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Floud, R., & Wachter, K. (1982). Poverty and physical stature: Evidence on the standard of living in London boys, 1770–1870. Social Science History, 6, 422–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Floud, R., Wachter, K., & Gregory, A. (1990). Height, health, and history: Nutritional status in the United Kingdom, 1750–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Floud, R., Fogel, R. W., Harris, B., & Hong, S. C. (2011). The changing body, health nutrition and human development in the western world since 1700 (NBER). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fogel, R. W. (1993). Economic growth, population theory and physiology: The bearing of long-term processes on the making of economic policy. American Economic Review, 84(3), 369–395.Google Scholar
  8. Fridlizius, G. (1989). The deformation of cohorts: Nineteenth century mortality decline in generational perspective. Scandinavian Economic History Review/Economy and Society, 37, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fries, J. F. (1980). Aging, natural death and compression of morbidity. New England Journal of Medicine, 303(3), 130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fries, J. F. (1989). The compression of morbidity: Near or far? Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 67(2), 208–232.Google Scholar
  11. Gavrilov, L. A., & Gavrilova, N. S. (2011). Mortality measurement at advanced ages: A study of the social security administration death master file. North American Actuarial Journal, 15(3), 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gavrilova, N. S., Gavrilov, L. A., Evdokushkina, G. N., & Semyonova, V. G. (2003). Early-life predictors of human longevity: Analysis of the 19th century birth-cohorts. Annales de Demographie Historique, 2, 177–198.Google Scholar
  13. Gompertz, B. (1825). On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on the mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 115, 513–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gompertz, B. (1872). On the uniform law of mortality from birth to extreme old age, and on the law of sickness. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 16, 329–344.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, B. (2001). “The child is the father to man” the relationship between child health and adult mortality in the 19th and 20th centuries. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 688–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartwell, R. M., & Engerman, S. (1975). Models of immiserization: The theoretical basis of pessimism. In A. J. Taylor (Ed.), The standard of living in Britain in the industrial revolution. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  17. Hayflick, L. (1985). Theories of aging. In R. Andres, E. L. Bierman, & W. R. Hazzard (Eds.), Principles of geriatric medicine (pp. 9–21). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Hobsbawm, E. J. (1957). The British standard of living, 1790–1850. The Economic History Review, 10, 46–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horiuchi, S. (1989). Some methodological issues in the assessment of the deceleration of the mortality decline. In L. Ruzicka, G. Wunsch, & P. Kane (Eds.), Differential mortality: Methodological issues and biosocial factors (pp. 64–78). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kermack, W. O., McKendrick, A. G., & McKinlay, P. L. (1934, March). Death rates in Great Britain and Sweden; Some general regularities and their significance. The Lancet, 31, 698–703.Google Scholar
  21. Kirkwood, T. B. L. (1977). Evolution of ageing. Nature, 270, 301–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirkwood, T. B. L. (1981). Repair and its evolution: Survival versus reproduction. In C. R. Townsend & P. Calow (Eds.), Physiological ecology an evolutionary approach to resource use (pp. 165–189). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Kirkwood, T. B. L. (1985). Comparative evolutionary aspects of longevity. In C. E. Finch & E. L. Schneider (Eds.), Handbook of the biology of aging (2nd ed., pp. 27–45). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kirkwood, T. B. L. (1999). Time of our lives: The science of human aging. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kirkwood, T. B. L., & Holliday, R. (1979). The evolution of longevity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 205, 532–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Komlos, J. (1993a). Further thoughts on the nutritional status of the British population. The Economic History Review, 46(3), 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Komlos, J. (1993b). A Malthusian episode revisited: The height of British and Irish servants in colonial America. The Economic History Review, 46(2), 768–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Komlos, J. (1993c). The secular trend in the biological standard of living in the United Kingdom: 1730–1860. The Economic History Review, 46(1), 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Komlos, J. (1998). Shrinking in a growing economy: The mystery of physical stature during the industrial revolution. Journal of Economic History, 58(3), 779–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, R. D., & Carter, L. R. (1992). Modeling and forecasting United States mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(419), 659–671.Google Scholar
  31. Lindert, P. (1994). Unequal living standards. In R. Floud & D. McCloskey (Eds.), The economic history of Britain since 1700 (Vol. 1, pp. 357–386). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lindert, P., & Williamson, J. (1983). English workers’ living standards during the industrial revolution: A new look. The Economic History Review, 36, 1–25.Google Scholar
  33. Medawar, P. B. (1952). An unsolved problem of biology. London: Lewis.Google Scholar
  34. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities, the human development approach. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. OECD. (2013). Public spending on health and long-term care: A new set of projections (OECD economic policy papers, no. 6). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  36. Oeppen, J., & Vaupel, J. (2002). Broken limits to life expectancy. Science, 296, 1029–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olshansky, S. J. (1985). Delay versus elimination of degenerative diseases. American Journal of Public Health, 75(7), 754–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olshansky, S. J., & Ault, A. B. (1986). The fourth stage of the epidemiologic transition: The age of delayed degenerative diseases. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 64(3), 355–391.Google Scholar
  39. Olshansky, S. J., Carnes, B. A., & Cassel, C. (1990). In search of Methuselah: Estimating the upper limits to human longevity. Science, 250, 634–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rau, R., Soroko, E., Jasilionis, D., & Vaupel, J. (2008). Continued reductions in mortality at advanced ages. Population and Development Review, 34(4), 747–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rose, M. R. (1991). Evolutionary biology of aging. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rosenbaum, S. (1988). 100 years of heights and weights. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 151, 276–309.Google Scholar
  43. Sen, A. K. (1984). The living standard. Oxford Economic Papers, 36.Google Scholar
  44. Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  45. Sen, A. K. (1987). In G. Hawthorn (Ed.), The standard of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sen, A. K. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Spicer, C. C. (1954). The generation method of analysis applied to mortality from respiratory tuberculosis. Journal of Hygiene, 52(3), 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Springett, V. H. (1952). An interpretation of the statistical trends in tuberculosis. Lancet, 259(6708), 521–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steckel, R. H. (1995). Stature and the standard of living. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(4), 1903–1940.Google Scholar
  50. Steckel, R. H., & Costa, D. L. (1997). Long-term trends in health, welfare and economic growth in the United States. In R. H. Steckel & R. Floud (Eds.), Health, welfare and industrialization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steckel, R. H., & Floud, R. (1997). Health, welfare and industrialization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strehler, B. L., & Mildvan, A. S. (1960). General theory of mortality and aging. Science, 132(3418), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thatcher, A. R., Kannisto, V., & Vaupel, J. W. (1998). The trajectory of mortality from ages 80 to 120. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Vaupel, J. W., & Lundström, H. (1994). Prospects for longer life expectancy. In D. Wise (Ed.), Studies in economics of aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Von Tunzelmann, N. (1979). Trends in real wages, 1750–1850, revisited. The Economic History Review, 32, 33–49.Google Scholar
  56. Von Tunzelmann, N. (1985). The standard of living debate and optimal economic growth. In J. Mokyr (Ed.), The economics of the industrial revolution. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  57. Waaler, H. T. (1984). Height, weight and mortality: The Norwegian experience. Acta Medica Scandinavia Supplement, 679, 1–51.Google Scholar
  58. Williams, G. C. (1957). Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senescence. Evolution, 11(4), 398–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams, B. (1987). The standard of living: Interests and capabilities. In G. Hawthorn (Ed.), Amartya Sen’s The standard of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suchit Arora
    • 1
  1. 1.State Teachers Retirement System of OhioColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations