Skip to main content

Multimodal Non-Rigid Registration Methods Based on Demons Models and Local Uncertainty Quantification Used in 3D Brain Images

  • Conference paper
Advances in Visual Computing (ISVC 2014)

Abstract

In this work, we propose a novel fully automated method to solve the 3D multimodal non-rigid image registration problem. The proposed strategy overcomes the monomodal intensity restriction of fluid-like registration (FLR) models, such as Demons-based registration algorithms, by applying a mapping that relies on an intensity uncertainty quantification in a local neighbourhood, bringing the target and source images into a common domain where they are comparable, no matter their image modalities or mismatched intensities between them. The proposed methodology was tested with T1, T2 and PD weighted brain magnetic resonance (MR) images with synthetic deformations, and CT-MR brain images from a radiotherapy clinical case. The performance of the proposed approach was evaluated quantitatively by standard indices that assess the correct alignment of anatomical structures of interest. The results obtained in this work show that the addition of the local uncertainty mapping properly resolve the monomodal restriction of FLR algorithms when same anatomic counterparts exists in the images to register, and suggest that the proposed strategy can be an option to achieve multimodal 3D registrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zitová, B., Flusser, J.: Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing 21, 977–1000 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Modersitzki, J.: Numerical Methods for Image Registration. Oxford University Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crum, W., Hartkens, T., Hill, D.: Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. British Journal of Radiology 77(spec. iss. 2), S140 – S153 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mani, V., Rivazhagan, D.: Survey of medical image registration. Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology 1(2), 8–25 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rueckert, D., Aljabar, P.: Nonrigid registration of medical images: Theory, methods, and applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 27(4), 113–119 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vásquez-Osorio, E.M., Hoogeman, M.S., Bondar, L., Levendag, P.C., Heijmen, B.J.M.: A novel flexible framework with automatic feature correspondence optimization for nonrigid registration in radiotherapy. Medical Physics 36(7), 2848–2859 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pluim, J.P.W., Maintz, J., Viergever, M.: Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22(8), 986–1004 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhuang, X., Arridge, S., Hawkes, D., Ourselin, S.: A nonrigid registration framework using spatially encoded mutual information and free-form deformations. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 30(10), 1819–1828 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hui, W., Yong, Y., Hongjun, W., Guanzhong, G.: A modified optical flow based method for registration of 4d ct data of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Virtual Environments Human-Computer Interfaces and Measurement Systems (VECIMS), pp. 21–25 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vercauteren, T., Pennec, X., Perchant, A., Ayache, N.: Diffeomorphic demons: Efficient non-parametric image registration. NeuroImage 45(1, suppl. 1), S61 – S72 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Janssens, G., Jacques, L., de Xivry, J.O., Geets, X., Macq, B.: Diffeomorphic registration of images with variable contrast enhancement. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging 2011, 3:1–3:12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baker, S., Scharstein, D., Lewis, J., Roth, S., Black, M., Szeliski, R.: A database and evaluation methodology for optical flow. International Journal of Computer Vision 92(1), 1–31 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arce-Santana, E., Campos-Delgado, D.U., Alba, A.: A non-rigid multimodal image registration method based on particle filter and optical flow. In: Bebis, G., et al. (eds.) ISVC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6453, pp. 35–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Thirion, J.P.: Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with maxwell’s. Medical Image Analysis 2, 243–260 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reducindo, I., Mejia-Rodriguez, A.R., Arce-Santana, E.R., Campos-Delgado, D.U., Vigueras-Gomez, F., Scalco, E., Bianchi, A.M., Cattaneo, G.M., Rizzo, G.: Multimodal non-rigid registration methods based on local variability measures in computed tomography and magnetic resonance brain images. IET Image Processing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nyul, L., Udupa, J., Zhang, X.: New variants of a method of mri scale standardization. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 19(2), 143–150 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwan, R., Evans, A., Pike, G.: Mri simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(11), 1085–1097 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heimann, T., Van Ginneken, B., Styner, M., Arzhaeva, Y., Aurich, V., Bauer, C., et al.: Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from ct datasets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 28(8), 1251–1265 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reducindo, I. et al. (2014). Multimodal Non-Rigid Registration Methods Based on Demons Models and Local Uncertainty Quantification Used in 3D Brain Images. In: Bebis, G., et al. Advances in Visual Computing. ISVC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8888. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14364-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14364-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14363-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14364-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics