Skip to main content

A Model for Understanding When Scaling Agile Is Appropriate in Large Organizations

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 199))

Abstract

The term “agile at scale” is used frequently in relation to agile approaches in large organizations, but the meaning of “scale” is not always clear. Without a proper understanding of meaning and context, inappropriate methods are applied. It is important to understand when “scaling agile” is the solution to the problem at hand, and when its not. There is a difference between agile approaches used by a team in a large organization, agile approaches used on a large development effort, and organization agility. The distinction is important. This paper explores that distinction using Human Systems Dynamics as a lens through which to understand and articulate which of the three contexts an organization is dealing with. By analyzing a system through the HSD lens it becomes possible to predict and influence the impact on the flow of work through the system, and in particular, it is possible to understand what types of impediments might impact the flow of work. This helps organizations to understand appropriate approaches to agility that better suit their context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Power, K., Conboy, K.: Impediments to Flow: Rethinking the Lean Concept of ‘Waste’ in Modern Software Development. In: Cantone, G., Marchesi, M. (eds.) XP 2014. LNBIP, vol. 179, pp. 203–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Eoyang, G.H.: Conditions for Self-Organizing in Human Systems. Doctor of Philosophy PhD Thesis for Doctor of Philosophy in Human Systems Dynamics. The Union Institute and University (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Power, K.: Social contracts, simple rules and self-organization: A perspective on agile development. In: Cantone, G., Marchesi, M. (eds.) XP 2014. LNBIP, vol. 179, pp. 277–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Olson, E.E., Eoyang, G.H.: Facilitating Organization Change: Lessons from Complexity Science. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, A Wiley Company, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Larman, C., Vodde, B.: Scaling lean & agile development: Thinking and organizational tools for large-scale Scrum. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Larman, C., Vodde, B.: Practices for scaling lean & agile development: large, multisite, and offshore product development with large-scale Scrum. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cockburn, A.: Crystal clear: A human-powered methodology for small teams. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bailey, C.A.: A Guide to Qualitative Field Research, 2nd edn. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin, R.K.: Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. The Guildford Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yin, R.K.: Applications of case study research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE, Inc., Thousand Oaks (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saldaña, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd., London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. European_Commission, Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L 124, 36, (May 20, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. EU recommendation 2003/361, European_Commission (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cohn, M.: Succeeding with Agile: Software Development Using Scrum. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Sutherland and K. Schwaber: The Scrum Guide. The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game (October 2013), Scrum.org

  17. Beck, K., Andres, C.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leffingwell, D.: Scaled Agile Framework (December 1, 2013), http://www.scaledagileframework.com/

  19. Conway, M.: How do Committees Invent? Datamation 14, 28–31 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Power, K. (2014). A Model for Understanding When Scaling Agile Is Appropriate in Large Organizations. In: Dingsøyr, T., Moe, N.B., Tonelli, R., Counsell, S., Gencel, C., Petersen, K. (eds) Agile Methods. Large-Scale Development, Refactoring, Testing, and Estimation. XP 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 199. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14358-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14358-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14357-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14358-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics