Advertisement

Online Learning and MOOCs: A Framework Proposal

  • Jamie Murphy
  • Nadzeya Kalbaska
  • Laurel Horton-Tognazzini
  • Lorenzo Cantoni
Conference paper

Abstract

Decades of distance learning evolution and innovation, particularly due to the Internet and recently, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), have led to industry and academic confusion about online learning nomenclature. This study takes a preliminary step in reducing the confusion, proposing a conceptual framework for categorising online learning. Drawing on content structure and interactivity, the paper proposes four categories of online learning: resources, tutorials, courses and MOOCs. These four categories serve as a base for illustrating five online learning variables—open versus closed access, cost, interactivity, recognition and assessment—which subsequently help clarify the framework of the four somewhat overlapping categories. The resultant framework gives industry and academia common ground for discussing online learning and for future research such as MOOC types and additional variables to consider, i.e., synchronicity, learning outcomes, openness, and self-direction.

Keywords

Online learning Tourism training Distance education MOOCs eLearning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is an updated, expanded and improved version of an APacCHRIE 2014 manuscript.

References

  1. Admiraal, W., & Lockhorst, D. (2009). E-learning in small and medium-sized enterprises across Europe. International Small Business Journal, 27(6), 743–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  3. Baker III, F. W., & Surry, D. (2013). Open education designs: A taxonomy for differentiating and classifying open learning environments. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Chesapeake, VA.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, A., & Sangrà, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, B., & Federman, J. (2013). eLearning in postsecondary education. The Future of Children, 23(1), 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cantoni, L., Botturi, L., Succi, C., & New MinE Lab. (2007). E-learning: Capire, progettare, comunicare. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  8. Cantoni, L., & Kalbaska, N. (2010). eLearning offers by destination management organizations. In U. Gretzel, R. Law, & M. Fuchs (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism (pp. 247–259). Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Cantoni, L., Kalbaska, N., & Inversini, A. (2009). E-learning in tourism and hospitality: A map. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 8(2), 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr, N. (2012, September 27). The crisis in higher education. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/429376/the-crisis-in-higher-education/. Accessed August 18, 2014.
  11. CEC. (2001). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament. The eLearning action plan: Designing tomorrow’s education. Brussels: COM.Google Scholar
  12. Chauhan, A. (2014). Massive open online courses (MOOCS): Emerging trends in assessment and accreditation. Digital Education Review, 25, 7–18.Google Scholar
  13. Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Pre-print book chapter, http://eprints.rclis.org/19388/4/Pegagogies%20for%20enhanced%20the%20learner%20experience%20and%20quality%20of%20MOOCs.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2014).
  14. Cooper, S., & Sahami, M. (2013). Reflections on Stanford’s MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(2), 28–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3, 1–20.Google Scholar
  16. Daniel, J., Kanwar, A., & Uvalić-Trumbić, S. (2009). Breaking higher education’s iron triangle: Access, cost, and quality. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41(2), 30–35. Available at: www.changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/March-April%202009/full-iron-triangle.html. Accessed October 18, 2014.
  17. DeBoer, J., Ho, A., Stump, G., & Breslow, L. (2014). Changing “Course”: Reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher. doi: 10.3102/0013189X14523038.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, A. (2013). From MOOCs to SPOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Handel, B., Groenland, C., & Gerzina, T. (2010). Dentistry students’ perceptions of learning management systems. European Journal of Dental Education, 14(1), 50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harden, N. (2013). The end of the university as we know it. The American Interest, 8, 54–62.Google Scholar
  21. Holmberg, B. (1995). The evolution of the character and practice of distance education. Open Learning, 10(2), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–159.Google Scholar
  23. Kalbaska, N. (2012). Travel agents and destination management organizations: eLearning as a strategy to train tourism trade partners. Journal of Information Technology and Tourism, 13(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  24. Kim, J. (2012, May 6). David Brooks confuses MOOCs with online learning. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/technology-and-learning/david-brooks-confuses-moocs-online-learning. Accessed August 14, 2014.
  25. Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2011). New dimensions to self-directed learning in an open networked learning environment. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 7(2), 2–20.Google Scholar
  26. Kuttainen, C., & Lexhagen, M. (2012). Overcoming barriers to SME e-commerce adoption using blended learning: A Swedish action research case study. Journal of Information Technology and Tourism, 13(1), 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers and Education, 53(3), 686–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murphy, J. (2012). LMS teaching versus community learning: A call for the latter. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25(5), 826–841.Google Scholar
  29. Murphy, J., Kalbaska, N., Williams, A., Ryan, P., Cantoni, L., & Horton-Tognazzini, L. (2014). Massive open online courses: Strategies and research areas. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 26(1), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nadkarni, S., & Venema, M. (2012). Tourism capacity building in developing geographies: A case for open educational resources. Journal of Information Technology and Tourism, 13(1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Negash, S., & Wilcox, M. V. (2008). E-learning classifications: Differences and similarities. In S. Negash, M. Whitman, A. Woszczynski, K. Hoganson, & H. Mattord (Eds.), Handbook of distance learning for real-time and asynchronous information technology education (pp. 1–23). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). Year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html. Accessed August 18, 2014.
  33. Peters, O. (2003). Distance education in transition. New trends and challenges. Oldenburg: Bibliotheks und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.Google Scholar
  34. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodriguez, O. (2013). The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs. Open Praxis, 5(1), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shimabakura, J. (2013, September 26). SPOCs are MOOC game changers. ETC Journal. http://etcjournal.com/2013/09/26/spocs-are-mooc-game-changers/. Accessed August 20, 2014.
  37. Sigala, M. (2002). The evolution of internet pedagogy: Benefits for tourism and hospitality education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 1(2), 29–45.Google Scholar
  38. Tankelevičienė, L., & Damaševičius, R. (2009). Towards a conceptual model of learning context in e-learning. Paper presented at the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning, ICALT 2009, Riga, Latvia. Accessed August 20, 2014.Google Scholar
  39. Wilkowski, J., Russell, D. M., & Deutsch, A. (2014). Self-evaluation in advanced power searching and mapping with Google MOOCs. Paper presented at the L@S‘14, Atlanta.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamie Murphy
    • 1
  • Nadzeya Kalbaska
    • 2
  • Laurel Horton-Tognazzini
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Cantoni
    • 2
  1. 1.Australian School of ManagementPerthAustralia
  2. 2.The Faculty of Communication SciencesUniversity of Italian SwitzerlandLuganoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations