Advertisement

Perceived Usability, Attractiveness and Intuitiveness of Responsive Mobile Tourism Websites: A User Experience Study

  • Aleksander Groth
  • Daniel Haslwanter
Conference paper

Abstract

Users increasingly access the internet through their smartphones creating the need for a different web design approach in order to meet the requirements of new user behaviour. Responsive Web design (RWD) is an approach to develop websites dynamically and adjust their layout and content to the screen size of a user’s device. This study investigates the impact of RWD on perceived usability, perceived attractiveness and intuitiveness through a user experience experiment of two touristic information websites (desktop and mobile versions) with varying levels of compliance to those guidelines. Results indicate that there are significant differences in perceived usability and user experience between desktop computers and smartphones in general. Additionally, mobile information services following a stricter approach to RWD are perceived as easier and more intuitive to use, yet they fail to create emotion and consequently are less recommended by users.

Keywords

Responsive web design Intuitiveness User experience Attractiveness 

References

  1. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.Google Scholar
  2. Bohyun, K. (2013). Responsive web design, discoverability, and mobile challenge. Library Technology Reports, 49, 29–39.Google Scholar
  3. Brau, H., & Sarodnick, F. (2006). Methoden der usability evaluation: Wissenschaft. Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung (Praxis der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 1st ed.). Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  4. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  5. Champeon, S. (2013). Progressive enhancement and the future of web design. Retrieved from http://hesketh.com/publications/progressive_enhancement_and_the_future_of_web_design.html
  6. Chawda, B., Craft, B., Cairns, P., Heesch, D., & Rüger, S. (2005). Do “attractive things work better”? An exploration of search tool visualisations. In O. W. Bertelsen (Ed.), Proceedings of 19th British HCI group annual conference: The bigger picture (pp. 46–51). Edinburgh: British HCI group.Google Scholar
  7. Church, K., & Oliver, N. (2011). Understanding mobile web and mobile search use in today’s dynamic mobile landscape. In M. Bylund, O. Juhlin, & Y. Fernaeus (Eds.), The 13th international conference (p. 67). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  8. Diefenbach, S., & Ullrich, D. (2011). Erlebnis intuitive Interaktion – ein phänomenologischer Ansatz. i-com, 10(3), 63–68.Google Scholar
  9. Fox, R. (2012). Being responsive. OCLC Systems and Services, 28(3), 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gardner, B. S. (2011). Responsive web design: Enriching the user experience—Connectivity and the user experience (pp. 13–19). Retrieved June 18, 2014.Google Scholar
  11. Gretzel, U., Fesenmaier, D., & O’Leary, J. T. (2008). The transformation of consumer behaviour. In D. Buhalis & C. Costa (Eds.), Tourism business frontiers: Consumers, products and industry (pp. 1–18). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Grün, C., Werthner, H., Pröll, B., Retschitzegger, W., & Schwinger, W. (2008) Assisting tourists on the move—An evaluation of mobile tourist guides. In 7th international conference on mobile business (ICMB) (pp. 171–180). Barcelona: IEEE.Google Scholar
  13. Hart, T. A., Chaparro, B. S., & Halcomb, C. G. (2008). Evaluating websites for older adults: adherence to ‘senior-friendly’ guidelines and end-user performance. Behaviour and Information Technology, 27(3), 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In J. Ziegler & G. Szwillus (Eds.), Proceedings of Mensch and computer (pp. 187–196). Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
  15. Hassenzahl, M., Kort, J., Law, E., Roto, V., & Vermeeren, A. (2009). Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: A survey approach. In R. B. Arthur & D. R. Olsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the CHI 09 conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 719–728). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  16. Hurtienne, J., Mohs, C., Meyer, H. A., Kindsmüller, M. C., & Habakuk Israel, J. (2006). Intuitive use of user interfaces—Definition und Herausforderungen. i-com, 5(3), 38–41.Google Scholar
  17. Ingram, A., Ribarsky, W., & Wang, X. (2012). Towards the establishment of a framework for intuitive multi-touch interaction design. In S. Levialdi, G. Tortora, & M. Tucci (Eds.), AVI ‘12 proceedings of the international working conference on advanced visual interfaces (pp. 66–73). New York, NY: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, J. (2012). Predicting net promoter scores from system usability scale scores: Measuring usability. Retrieved July 21, 2014, from http://www.measuringusability.com/blog/nps-sus.php
  19. Marcotte, E. (2011). Responsive web design. New York, NY: Book Apart.Google Scholar
  20. Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Retrieved December 16, 2013, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/
  21. Nielsen, J., & Budiu, R. (2013). Mobile usability. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google Scholar
  22. Quinn, J. M., & Tran, T. Q. (2010). Attractive phones don’t have to work better: Independent effects of attractiveness, effectiveness, and efficiency on perceived usability. In E. Mynatt, D. Schoner, G. Fitzpatrick, S. Hudson, K. Edwards, & T. Rodden (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 353–362). Atlanta, GA: ACM.Google Scholar
  23. Raptis, D., Tselios, N., Kjeldskov, J., & Skov, M. B. (2013). Does size matter? In M. Rohs, A. Schmidt, D. Ashbrook, & E. Rukzio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international conference on human-computer-interaction with mobile devices and services (p. 127). New York, NY: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rasinger, J., Fuchs, M., & Höpken, W. (2007). Information search with mobile tourist guides: A survey of usage intention. Information Technology and Tourism, 9(3), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–55.Google Scholar
  26. Ricci, F. (2010). Mobile recommender systems. Information Technology and Tourism, 12(3), 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2010). Average task times in usability tests. In E. Mynatt, D. Schoner, G. Fitzpatrick, S. Hudson, K. Edwards, & T. Rodden (Eds.), The 28th international conference (p. 2347). Atlanta, GA: ACM.Google Scholar
  28. Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2012). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  29. Tanimura, M., & Ueno, T. (2013). Smartphone user interface. FUJITSU Scientific and Technical, 49(2), 227–230.Google Scholar
  30. Ullrich, D., & Diefenbach, S. (2010). INTUI: Exploring the facets of intuitive interaction. In J. Ziegler (Ed.), Mensch and computer 2010: 10. fachübergreifende Konferenz für interaktive und kooperative Medien; interaktive Kulturen (p. 251). München: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  31. Ulrich, D., & Diefenbach, S. (2010). From magical experience to effortlessness: An exploration of the components of intuitive interaction. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (pp. 801–804). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  32. Wang, D., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2013). Transforming the travel experience: The use of smartphones for travel. In L. Cantoni & Z. Xiang (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2013 (pp. 58–69). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wessels, A., Purvis, M., & Rahman, S. (2011). Usability of web interfaces on mobile devices. In ITNG (Ed.), Eighth international conference on information technology: New generations (pp. 1066–1067). Las Vegas, NV: IEEE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Management, Communication and IT (MCiT)Management Center InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations