Abstract
Studies have analyzed the quality of volunteered geographic information (VGI) datasets, assessing the positional accuracy of features and the semantic accuracy of the attributes. While it has been shown that VGI can, in some contexts, reach a high positional accuracy, these studies have also highlighted a large spatial heterogeneity in positional accuracy and completeness, but also concerning the semantics of the objects. Such high semantic heterogeneity of VGI datasets becomes a significant obstacle to a number of possible uses that could be made of the data. This paper proposes an approach for both improving the semantic quality and reducing the semantic heterogeneity of VGI datasets. The improvement of the semantic quality is achieved by using a tag recommender system, called OSMantic, which automatically suggests relevant tags to contributors during the editing process. Such an approach helps contributors find the most appropriate tags for a given object, hence reducing the overall dataset semantic heterogeneity. The approach was implemented into a plugin for the Java OpenStreetMap editor (JOSM) and different examples illustrate how this plugin can be used to improve the quality of VGI data. This plugin has been tested by OSM contributors and evaluated using an online questionnaire. Results of the evaluation suggest a high level of satisfaction from users and are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
OpenStreetMap Website: http://openstreetmap.org/ (Accessed 3 October 2014).
- 2.
OpenStreetMap Statistics: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stats (Accessed 3 October 2014).
- 3.
DBPedia Website: http://dbpedia.org/ (Accessed 3 October 2014).
- 4.
GeoNames Website: http://www.geonames.org/ (Accessed 3 October 2014).
- 5.
OSM Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features (Accessed 3 October 2014).
- 6.
OSM Wiki Proposed Features “Abandoned”: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Proposed_features_%22Abandoned%22 (Accessed 3 October 2014).
- 7.
OSMantic Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/OSMantic (Accessed 3 October 2014).
- 8.
Editor usage statistics: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editor_usage_stats (Accessed 3 October 2014).
- 9.
OpenStreetMap Presets: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/TaggingPresets (Accessed 3 October 2014).
References
Auer S, Lehmann J, Hellmann S (2009) LinkedGeoData: adding a spatial dimension to the web of data. In: Proceedings of the 8th international semantic web conference, ISWC’09, Washington, DC. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5823, Springer, Berlin, pp 731–746
Ballatore A, Bertolotto M, Wilson DC (2013) Geographic knowledge extraction and semantic similarity in OpenStreetMap. Knowl Inf Syst (KAIS) 37(1):61–81
Barron C, Neis P, Zipf A (2014) A comprehensive framework for intrinsic OpenStreetMap quality analysis. Trans GIS 18(6):877−895. doi:10.1111/tgis.12073
Bégin D, Devillers R, Roche S (2013) Assessing volunteered geographic information (VGI) quality based on contributors’ mapping behaviours. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on spatial data quality ISSDQ 2013, Hong Kong, China, pp 149–154
Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314:572
Budhathoki NR, Nedović-Budić Z, Bertram B (2010) An interdisciplinary frame for understanding volunteered geographic information. J Geospat Inf Sci Technol Pract 64(1):11–26
Codescu M, Horsinka G, Kutz O, Mossakowski T, Rau R (2011) DO-ROAM: activity-oriented search and navigation with OpenStreetMap. In: Claramunt C, Levashkin S, Bertolotto M (eds) Fourth international conference on geospatial semantics, vol 6631, Brest, France. Lecture notes in computer science, Springer, Berlin, pp 88–107
Coleman DJ, Georgiadou Y, Labonte J (2009) Volunteered geographic information: the nature and motivation of produsers. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 4:332–358
Elwood S, Goodchild MF, Sui DZ (2012) Researching volunteered geographic information: spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103(3):571–590
Flanagin AJ, Metzger MJ (2008) The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 72:137–148
Girres J-F, Touya G (2010) Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Trans GIS 14(4):435–459
Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69:211–221
Goodchild MF, Li L (2012) Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spat Stat 1:110–120
Haklay M (2010) How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 37:682–703
Haklay M (2013) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation. In: Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild M (eds) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 105–122
Haklay M, Basiouka S, Antoniou V, Ather A (2010) How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of Linus’ law to volunteered geographic information. Cartographic J 47(4):315–322
ISO/TC 211 (2002) 19113 Geographic information—quality principles. International Organization for Standardization (No. ISO 19113:2002). International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
Keßler C, de Groot RTA (2013) Trust as a proxy measure for the quality of volunteered geographic information in the case of OpenStreetMap. In: Association of geographic information laboratories for Europe. Presented at the Agile 2013, Leuven, Belgium, pp 21–37
Ludwig I, Voss A, Krause-Traudes M (2011) A comparison of the street networks of Navteq and OSM in Germany. In: Geertman S, Reinhardt W, Toppen F (eds) Advancing geoinformation science for a changing world. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–84
Mooney P, Corcoran P (2012a) The annotation process in OpenStreetMap. Trans GIS 16(4):561–579
Mooney P, Corcoran P (2012b) Characteristics of heavily edited objects in OpenStreetMap. Future Internet 4(1):285–305
Mülligann C, Janowicz K, Ye M, Lee W-C (2011) Analyzing the spatial-semantic interaction of points of interest in volunteered geographic information. In: Egenhofer M, Giudice N, Moratz R, Worboys M (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 350–370
Neis P, Zipf A (2012) Analyzing the contributor activity of a volunteered geographic information project—the case of OpenStreetMap. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 1(2):146–165
Peters I, Stock WG (2010) “Power tags” in information retrieval. Libr Hi Tech 28(1):81–93
Pu P, Chen L, Hu R (2011) A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on recommender systems, RecSys ’11. ACM, New York, USA, pp 157–164
Rehrl K, Gröechenig S, Hochmair H, Leitinger S, Steinmann R, Wagner A (2013) A conceptual model for analyzing contribution patterns in the context of VGI. In: Krisp JM (ed) Progress in location-based services. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin, pp 373–388
Smith B, Mark DM (2003) Do mountains exist? Towards an ontology of landforms. Environ Plan 30(3):411–427
Tobler W (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the detroit region. Econ Geogr 46:234–240
van Exel M, Dias E (2011) Towards a methodology for trust stratification in VGI. In: Volunteered geographic information (VGI)—research progress and new developments. Presented at the association of American geographers annual meeting 2011, Seattle, Washington, p 4
Zhao P, Han J, Sun Y (2009) PRank: a comprehensive structural similarity measure over information networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference in information and knowledge management. Presented at the CIKM, 09, ACM Press, New York, pp 553–562
Zipf GK (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort: an introduction to human ecology. Martino fine books, USA. p 588
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through the second author’s NSERC Discovery Accelerator Supplement Program. Authors also thank Dr. Andrea Ballatore for sharing his results, Vincent Privat for his helpful feedback on JOSM, Daniel Bégin for his early tests of the plugin and the 30 OSM contributors that participated in the evaluation of the plugin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vandecasteele, A., Devillers, R. (2015). Improving Volunteered Geographic Information Quality Using a Tag Recommender System: The Case of OpenStreetMap. In: Jokar Arsanjani, J., Zipf, A., Mooney, P., Helbich, M. (eds) OpenStreetMap in GIScience. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14279-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14280-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)