Skip to main content

Transition of the Canadian Forest Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future Use of Nordic Forests

Abstract

This chapter examines how Canada is trying to transform the current structure of its forest sector. The Canadian transition is somewhat similar to that of Sweden. Thus, the measures taken by Canada, though differing in many particulars from the Swedish efforts, are also considered as potential “lessons learned” from a Swedish perspective. The forest sectors of the northern hemisphere are undergoing dramatic structural changes as a result of stagnation or decline in the traditional developed economy markets and rapid market growth in the emerging economies. The conditions for the economically sustainable production of industrial forest products are changing rapidly worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Several leading documents of the criticism of the forest management in Canada are: Cut & Run: The Assault on Canada’s Forests (Swift 1983), At the Cutting Edge: The Crisis in Canada’s Forests (May 1998, revised 2005), Canada’s Forests at a Crossroads: An Assessment in the Year 2000 (Global Forest Watch 2000), The Sacred Balance: Rediscovering our Place in Nature (Suzuki and McConnell 2002), The Boreal Forest at Risk: A Progress Report (Canadian Boreal Initiative 2003), and The State of Ontario’s Forests: A Cause For Concern (Sierra Club of Canada 2003).

  2. 2.

    Documentation of all Bio-pathways processes and most of the results of Bio-pathways and Value Pathways can be found at www.fpac.ca.

References

  • Bonoguore, T. (2012). Half-time report. Alternatives Journal, 38, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Boreal Initiative. (2003). The boreal forest at risk: A progress report. Ottawa: Canadian Boreal Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B., & McDermott, C. (2004). Global environmental forest policies: Canada as a constant case comparison of select forest practice regulations. Ottawa: International Forest Resources Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronicle Journal. (2011, March 22). NAN targets boreal agreement.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIELAP. (2011). A green economy for Canada: Consulting with Canadians. Ottawa: The Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullingham, C. I., et al. (2011). Mountain pine beetle host-range expansion threatens the boreal forest. Molecular Ecology, 20(10), 2157–2171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominion. (2010, May 26). Reactions to Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement. The Dominion, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duinker, P. N., et al. (2010). Protected areas and sustainable forest management: What are we talking about? The Forestry Chronicle, 86(2), 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Forest Watch. (2000). Canada’s forests at a crossroads: An assessment in the year 2000. Washington, DC: Global Forest Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill Times. (2011, December 5). Hard-hit forestry sector sees its future in the bio-economy. The Hill Times, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Library of Parliament. (2005). Sustainable forest management in Canada: Clear policy – questionable practice. Ottawa: Library of Parliament, Science and Technology Division, PRB 05-13E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckert, M. K., Haley, D., & Hogberg, G. (2011). Policies for sustainably managing Canada’s forests. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel-Campbell, A. (2007). Why Mexican’s don’t Drink Molson. Rescuing Canadian business from the suds of global obscurity. Vancouver/Toronto: Douglas & McIntyre.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, C., Cashore, B., & Kanowski, P. (2010). Global environmental forest policies. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, S. N., & Kant, S. (2010). Global competitiveness index for forest product industries. Edmonton: Sustainable Forest Management Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Forestry Database. (2011). Wood supply background. Ottawa: National Forestry Database, Ministry of Natural Resources Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Canada. (1991–2011). The state of Canada’s forests: Annual reports 1991 to 2011. Ottawa: Ministry of Natural Resources Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature. (2010, May 18). Pact protects Canadian forests. Nature, 465, 279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature. (2011, March 30). Canadian forest deal at risk. Nature, 471, 560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, S. (2012). Mountain pine beetle infestation in British Columbia. Consulting Report to Portusel, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRT. (2011). Paying the price: The economic impacts of climate change for Canada. Ottawa: National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odendahl, S. (2011, 25 June). Boreal deal putting down roots. Listed Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottosson, M. (2011). The forest industry and the energy transition [In Swedish]. Stockholm: The Stockholm School of Economics Institute for Research, SIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, D. (2010, May 26). The Canadian boreal forest agreement reconsidered. The Dominion, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer, O. C. (2007). Theory U: Leading from the emerging future as it emerges: The social technology of presencing. Cambridge, MA: SoL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra Club of Canada. (2003). The state of Ontarios forests: A cause for concern. Ottawa: Sierra Club of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D., & McConnell, A. (2002). The sacred balance: Rediscovering our place in nature. Vancouver: Greystone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, J. (1983). Cut & run: The assault on Canada’s forests. Toronto: Between The Lines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, A. (2011). Provincial–local projection of the current mountain pine beetle outbreak. Victoria: BC Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnipeg Free Press. (2010, May 29). Native chiefs cut down celebrated forestry deal. Winnipeg: Winnipeg Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Forest. (2010, October 20). First nation leadership dismisses B.C. boreal forest meeting. The Working Forest Newspaper, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sten Nilsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nilsson, S. (2015). Transition of the Canadian Forest Sector. In: Westholm, E., Beland Lindahl, K., Kraxner, F. (eds) The Future Use of Nordic Forests. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14218-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics