Skip to main content

Actors’ Perceptions and Strategies: Forests and Pathways to Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Future Use of Nordic Forests

Abstract

This chapter discusses how the future is handled by actors in the present. It investigates how actors’ perceptions of the future—its challenges and its opportunities—influence their strategies and actions. The chapter starts with a frame analysis exploring the visions of a range of actors relevant to Swedish forest sector development. It aims to describe major divisions in the debate on future forest use and on a variety of ways to deal with uncertainty, ambiguity, and ignorance. The analysis relates to international processes important to the Swedish forest sector and feeds into a discussion of competing pathways to “sustainability”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, J. (2008). The future landscape (Arbetsrapport 2008:5). Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. (2006a). Sustainable development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. (2006b). Environmental values and climate change policy: Contrasting the European Union and the United States. In S. Lucarelli & I. Manners (Eds.), Values in EU policy (pp. 77–96). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. (2007). Sustainable development as symbolic commitment: Declaratory politics and the seductive appeal of ecological modernization in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society: A Hobhouse Memorial Public Lecture given on Wednesday 15 February 2006 at the London School of Economics. Economy and Society, 35(3), 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beland Lindahl, K. (2008). Frame analysis, place perceptions and the politics of natural Resource Management: Exploring a forest policy controversy in Sweden. Doctoral dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences 2008. Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2008:60. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beland Lindahl, K., & Westholm, E. (2011). Future forests: Perceptions and strategies of key actors. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27(2), 154–163. doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.635073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn, I. (2000). Post-ecologist politics: Social theory and the abdication of the ecologist paradigm. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn, I. (2001). Reflexivity and self-referentiality: On the normative foundations of ecological communication. Critical Studies, 16, 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F. H. (2000). Ecological modernisation as a social theory. Geoforum, 31, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (1998). Justice and the environment: Conceptions of environmental sustainability and dimensions of social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gane, M. (2007). Forest strategy: Strategic management and sustainable development for the forest sector. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1996). Ecological modernisation as cultural politics. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology (pp. 246–268). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jänicke, M. (1992). Conditions for environmental policy success: An international comparison. Environmentalist, 12(1), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41, 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langhelle, O. (2000). Why ecological modernization and sustainable development should not be conflated. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2(4), 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2010). Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment, social justice. London/Washington, DC: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review. In A. P. J. Mol & D. A. Sonnenfeld (Eds.), Ecological modernisation around the world: Perspectives and critical debates (pp. 17–49). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. (1997). Democracy and the sustainability transition. In W. M. Lafferty & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects (pp. 140–156). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • PERRI 6. (2005). What’s in a frame? Social organisation, risk perception and the sociology of knowledge. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 91–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardar, Z. (1999). The problem of future studies. In Z. Sardar (Ed.), Rescuing all our futures: The future of futures studies (pp. 9–19). Twickenham: Adamantine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonis, U. (1989). Ecological modernisation of industrial society: Three strategic elements. International Social Science Journal, 121, 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernization theory and the changing discourse on environment and modernity. In G. Spaargaren, A. P. J. Mol, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Environment and global modernity (pp. 41–71). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weale, A. (1992). The new politics of pollution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Beland Lindahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beland Lindahl, K. (2015). Actors’ Perceptions and Strategies: Forests and Pathways to Sustainability. In: Westholm, E., Beland Lindahl, K., Kraxner, F. (eds) The Future Use of Nordic Forests. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14218-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics