Abstract
This chapter discusses how the future is handled by actors in the present. It investigates how actors’ perceptions of the future—its challenges and its opportunities—influence their strategies and actions. The chapter starts with a frame analysis exploring the visions of a range of actors relevant to Swedish forest sector development. It aims to describe major divisions in the debate on future forest use and on a variety of ways to deal with uncertainty, ambiguity, and ignorance. The analysis relates to international processes important to the Swedish forest sector and feeds into a discussion of competing pathways to “sustainability”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersson, J. (2008). The future landscape (Arbetsrapport 2008:5). Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies.
Baker, S. (2006a). Sustainable development. London: Routledge.
Baker, S. (2006b). Environmental values and climate change policy: Contrasting the European Union and the United States. In S. Lucarelli & I. Manners (Eds.), Values in EU policy (pp. 77–96). London: Routledge.
Baker, S. (2007). Sustainable development as symbolic commitment: Declaratory politics and the seductive appeal of ecological modernization in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 297–317.
Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society: A Hobhouse Memorial Public Lecture given on Wednesday 15 February 2006 at the London School of Economics. Economy and Society, 35(3), 329–345.
Beland Lindahl, K. (2008). Frame analysis, place perceptions and the politics of natural Resource Management: Exploring a forest policy controversy in Sweden. Doctoral dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences 2008. Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2008:60. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Beland Lindahl, K., & Westholm, E. (2011). Future forests: Perceptions and strategies of key actors. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27(2), 154–163. doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.635073.
Blühdorn, I. (2000). Post-ecologist politics: Social theory and the abdication of the ecologist paradigm. London: Routledge.
Blühdorn, I. (2001). Reflexivity and self-referentiality: On the normative foundations of ecological communication. Critical Studies, 16, 181–201.
Buttel, F. H. (2000). Ecological modernisation as a social theory. Geoforum, 31, 57–65.
Dobson, A. (1998). Justice and the environment: Conceptions of environmental sustainability and dimensions of social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gane, M. (2007). Forest strategy: Strategic management and sustainable development for the forest sector. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hajer, M. A. (1996). Ecological modernisation as cultural politics. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology (pp. 246–268). London: Sage.
Jänicke, M. (1992). Conditions for environmental policy success: An international comparison. Environmentalist, 12(1), 47–58.
Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41, 223–244.
Langhelle, O. (2000). Why ecological modernization and sustainable development should not be conflated. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2(4), 303–322.
Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2010). Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment, social justice. London/Washington, DC: Earthscan.
Mol, A., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review. In A. P. J. Mol & D. A. Sonnenfeld (Eds.), Ecological modernisation around the world: Perspectives and critical debates (pp. 17–49). London: Frank Cass.
O’Riordan, T. (1997). Democracy and the sustainability transition. In W. M. Lafferty & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects (pp. 140–156). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
PERRI 6. (2005). What’s in a frame? Social organisation, risk perception and the sociology of knowledge. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 91–118.
Sardar, Z. (1999). The problem of future studies. In Z. Sardar (Ed.), Rescuing all our futures: The future of futures studies (pp. 9–19). Twickenham: Adamantine Press.
Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Simonis, U. (1989). Ecological modernisation of industrial society: Three strategic elements. International Social Science Journal, 121, 347–361.
Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernization theory and the changing discourse on environment and modernity. In G. Spaargaren, A. P. J. Mol, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Environment and global modernity (pp. 41–71). London: Sage.
Weale, A. (1992). The new politics of pollution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beland Lindahl, K. (2015). Actors’ Perceptions and Strategies: Forests and Pathways to Sustainability. In: Westholm, E., Beland Lindahl, K., Kraxner, F. (eds) The Future Use of Nordic Forests. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14218-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14218-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14217-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14218-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)