Abstract
This paper presents an ensemble system for dependency parsing of Italian: three parsers are separately trained and combined by means of a majority vote. The three parsers are the MATE parser, version 2.0, the DeSR parser, and the MALT parser. We present three experiments showing that a simple voting combination further improves the performances of the parsers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
In this paper we use the term word in a general sense, as synonym of token.
- 5.
File: it_isst_train.splet.
- 6.
File: it_isst_test.splet.
- 7.
File: it_isst_train.splet and it_isst_test.splet.
- 8.
File: it_EULaw_test_blind.splet.
- 9.
File: it_isst_train.splet and it_isst_test . splet.
- 10.
File: it_NatRegLaw_test_blind.splet.
- 11.
File: evalita201_ train.conll.
- 12.
File: evalita2011_ test.conll.
- 13.
The same consideration hold for COM2: in the second experiment there are just \(8\) corrupted trees.
- 14.
- 15.
The UniPi parser is the DeSR parser tuned for this specific competition.
- 16.
The FBKirst parser is an ensemble combination of the MALT parser.
References
Anders, B., Bernd, B., Hafdell, L., Nugues, P.: A high-performance syntactic and semantic dependency parser. In: Coling 2010: Demonstrations, pp. 33–36. Coling 2010 Organizing Committee, Beijing, China (August 2010), http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C10-3009
Attardi, G.: Experiments with a multilanguage non-projective dependency parser. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pp. 166–170. Association for Computational Linguistics, New York (June 2006), http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W06/W06-2922
Attardi, G., dell’Orletta, F.: Reverse revision and linear tree combination for dependency parsing. In: HLT-NAACL, pp. 261–264 (2009)
Attardi, G., Simi, M., Zanelli, A.: Tuning DeSR for the Evalita 2011 Dependency Parsing. In: Working Notes of EVALITA 2011. CELCT a r.l. (2012) ISSN 2240–5186
Bohnet, B.: Efficient parsing of syntactic and semantic dependency structures. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL’09), Shared Task, pp. 67–72. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2009), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1596409.1596421
Bohnet, B.: Top accuracy and fast dependency parsing is not a contradiction. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010), pp. 89–97. Coling 2010 Organizing Committee, Beijing, China (August 2010), http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C10-1011
Bosco, C., Lombardo, V.: Dependency and relational structure in treebank annotation. In: Proceedings of the COLING’04 workshop on Recent Advances in Dependency Grammar. Geneve, Switzerland (2004), http://www.di.unito.it/~bosco/publicat/dependency-coling04.zip
Bosco, C., Mazzei, A.: The Evalita 2011 parsing task: the dependency track. In: Working Notes of EVALITA 2011. CELCT a r.l. (2012) ISSN 2240–5186
Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24(2), 123–140 (1996)
Carreras, X.: Experiments with a higher-order projective dependency parser. In: Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task Session of EMNLP-CoNLL 200, pp. 957–961 (2007), http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D07/D07-1101
Dell’Orletta, F., Marchi, S., Montemagni, S., Plank, B., Venturi, G.: The SPLeT-2012 Shared Task on Dependency Parsing of Legal Texts. In: SPLeT 2012—Fourth Workshop on Semantic Processing of Legal Texts (SPLeT 2012)—First Shared Task on Dependency Parsing of Legal Texts (2012)
EVALITA 2011 Organization Committee: Working Notes of EVALITA 2011. CELCT a r.l (2012)
Hajič, J., Ciaramita, M., Johansson, R., Kawahara, D., Martí, M.A., Màrquez, L., Meyers, A., Nivre, J., Padó, S., Štěpánek, J., Straňák, P., Surdeanu, M., Xue, N., Zhang, Y.: The conll-2009 shared task: syntactic and semantic dependencies in multiple languages. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning CoNLL’09, Shared Task, pp. 1–18. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2009), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1596409.1596411
Hall, J., Nilsson, J., Nivre, J., Eryigit, G., Megyesi, B., Nilsson, M., Saers, M.: Single malt or blended? A study in multilingual parser optimization. In: Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task Session of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007, pp. 933–939 (2007), http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D07/D07-1097
Johansson, R., Nugues, P.: Dependency-based syntactic-semantic analysis with propbank and nombank. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning CoNLL’08, pp. 183–187. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2008), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1596324.1596355
Kübler, S., McDonald, R.T., Nivre, J.: Dependency Parsing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2009)
Lavelli, A.: An ensemble model for the EVALITA 2011 dependency parsing task. In: Working Notes of EVALITA 2011. CELCT a r.l. (2012). ISSN 2240–5186
Mazzei, A., Bosco, C.: Simple parser combination. In: SPLeT 2012—4th Workshop on Semantic Processing of Legal Texts (SPLeT 2012)—First Shared Task on Dependency Parsing of Legal Texts, pp. 57–61 (2012)
McDonald, R., Pereira, F.: Online learning of approximate dependency parsing algorithms. In: Proceedings of 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-2006), vol. 6, pp. 81–88 (2006)
Nivre, J.: Algorithms for deterministic incremental dependency parsing. Comput. Linguist. 34(4), 513–553 (2008)
Nivre, J., Hall, J., Kübler, S., McDonald, R., Nilsson, J., Riedel, S., Yuret, D.: The CoNLL 2007 shared task on dependency parsing. In: Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task Session of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007, pp. 915–932 (2007), http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D07/D07-1096
Nivre, J., Hall, J., Nilsson, J.: Maltparser: a data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In: Proceedings of LREC-2006, vol. 6, pp. 2216–2219 (2006)
Sagae, K., Lavie, A.: Parser combination by reparsing. In: Moore, R.C., Bilmes, J.A., Chu-Carroll, J., Sanderson, M. (eds.) HLT-NAACL. The Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)
Surdeanu, M., Manning, D.C.: Ensemble models for dependency parsing: cheap and good? In: NAACL. The Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
Yamada, H., Matsumoto, Y.: Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines. In: Proceedings of IWPT, vol. 3 (2003)
Zeman, D., Žabokrtskỳ, Z.: Improving parsing accuracy by combining diverse dependency parsers. In: International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, pp. 171–178. Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mazzei, A. (2015). Simple Voting Algorithms for Italian Parsing. In: Basili, R., Bosco, C., Delmonte, R., Moschitti, A., Simi, M. (eds) Harmonization and Development of Resources and Tools for Italian Natural Language Processing within the PARLI Project. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 589. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14206-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14206-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14205-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14206-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)