Skip to main content

Innovating How We Teach Collaborative Design Through Studio-Based Pedagogy

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Educational Media and Technology Yearbook ((EMTY,volume 39))

Abstract

Over the past decade, a handful of researchers have studied the most important skills for becoming an effective instructional designer (Kenny, Zhang, Schwier, & Campbell, 2014; Lowenthal, Wilson, & Dunlap, 2010; Ritzhaupt, Martin, & Daniels, 2010; Sugar, Brown, Daniels, & Hoard, 2011; Sugar et al., 2012). While nearly all employers indicate the need for specific instructional design skills and knowledge (e.g., ADDIE, ID models), many of the most requested skills are neither technical nor theoretical, but instead include social skills such as creativity, teamwork, and communication. For example, collaboration was the second most requested skill of instructional design job postings in Sugar et al.’s (2012) findings, while communication skills was the third most requested ability. In a Delphi study of instructional designers in higher education, communication and social skills were the first and second most important skills, respectively (Sugar et al., 2011). In this chapter, we discuss how a studio-based approach to instruction may foster such skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzam, A. M. (2009). Why creativity now? A conversation with Sir Ken Robinson. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2010). Intensive studio experience in a non-studio masters program: Student activities and thinking across levels of design. Montreal, QC: Design Research Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2014). Critical issues in studio pedagogy: Beyond the mystique and down to business. In B. Hokanson & A. S. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology. Design thinking, design processes, and the design studio (pp. 37–56). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2011). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 329–348. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9181-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. (2005). New learning environments for the 21st century. Retrieved January 29, 2015, from http://www.johnseelybrown.com/newlearning.pdf.

  • Burleson, W. (2005). Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 63(4), 436–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo, K., & Brandt, C. (2012). The “right kind of telling”: Knowledge building in the academic design studio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 839–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo, K., Brandt, C., Scott, B., Douglas, S., McGrath, M., Reimer, Y., et al. (2011). Managing the complexity of design problems through studio-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2). doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, G., & Rieber, L. P. (2010). The studio experience at the University of Georgia: An example of constructionist learning for adults. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 755–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crofts, N. (2014, April 29). BYU animation program brings home 2 student Emmys. Retrieved from http://www.ksl.com/?sid=29686907

  • Egan, T. M. (2005). Creativity in the context of team diversity: Team leader perspectives. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 207–225. doi:10.1177/1523422305274526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, J. (2014). Teaching novice programmers how to debug their code. Code:Union [Web page]. Retrieved from http://blog.codeunion.io/2014/09/03/teaching-novices-how-to-debug-code/

  • Fundacion Paraguaya. (2014). Poverty stoplight. Retrieved from http://www.fundacionparaguaya.org.py/?page_id=490

  • Gibbons, A. S., & Rogers, C. P. (2009). The architecture of instructional theory. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 305–326). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokanson, B., & Gibbons, A. S. (2013). Design in educational technology. Design thinking, design processes, and the design studio. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justeson, S. (2004). University in communities of practice. In P. Hildreth & C. Kinble (Eds.), Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice (pp. 79–95). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, R. F., Zhang, Z., Schwier, R. A., & Campbell, K. (2014). A review of what instructional designers do: Questions answered and questions not asked. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamykina, L., Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2002). Collaborative creativity. Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 96–99. doi:10.1145/570907.570940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, E., & Dawson, S. (2005). Teaching for creativity: Towards sustainable and replicable pedagogical practice. Higher Education, 56(6), 633–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, P., Wilson, B. G., & Dunlap, J. C. (2010). An analysis of what instructional designers need to know and be able to do to get a job. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madjar, N. (2005). The contributions of different groups of individuals to employees’ creativity. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 182–206. doi:10.1177/1523422305274525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooallem, J. (2013, May 23). When Hollywood wants good, clean fun, it goes to Mormon country. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/26/magazine/when-hollywood-wants-good-clean-fun-it-goes-to-mormon-country.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&

  • Nelson, W. A. (2003). Problem solving through design. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2003(95), 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orey, M., Rieber, L., King, J., & Matzko, M. (2000). The studio experience: Curriculum reform in an instructional technology graduate program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. L., Johnson, J. C., West, R. E., & Wiley, D. A. (2013). Teaching, doing and sharing project management: The development of an instructional design project management textbook. Educational Technology, 53(6), 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, Y. J., Cennamo, K., & Douglas, S. A. (2012). Emergent themes in a UI design hybrid-studio course. In SIGCSE’12: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 625–630). ACM. doi:10.1145/2157136.2157315.

  • Rieber, L. P. (2000). The studio experience: Educational reform in instructional technology. In D. G. Brown (Ed.), Teaching with technology: Seventy-five professors from eight universities tell their stories (pp. 195–196). Bolton, MA: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzhaupt, A., Martin, F., & Daniels, K. (2010). Multimedia competencies for an educational technologist: A survey of professionals and job announcement analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(4), 421–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Educating for innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 41–48. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2005.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2004). Instructional design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar, W., Brown, A., Daniels, L., & Hoard, B. (2011). Instructional design and technology professionals in higher education: Multimedia production knowledge and skills identified from a delphi study. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 1(2), 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar, W., Hoard, B., Brown, A., & Daniels, L. (2012). Identifying multimedia production competencies and skills of instructional design and technology professionals: An analysis of recent job postings. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(3), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. E. (2009). What is shared? A framework for understanding shared innovation within communities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(3), 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. E. (2014). Communities of innovation: Individual, group, and organizational characteristics leading to greater potential for innovation. TechTrends, 58(5), 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Learning to design collaboratively: Participation of student designers in a community of innovation. Instructional Science, 39(6), 821–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. E., Tateishi, I., Wright, G. A., & Fonoimoana, M. (2012). Innovation 101: Promoting undergraduate innovation through a two-day boot camp. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. E., Williams, G. S., & Williams, D. D. (2013). Improving problem-based learning in creative communities through effective group evaluation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2). doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1394.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Rich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rich, P.J., West, R.E., Warr, M. (2015). Innovating How We Teach Collaborative Design Through Studio-Based Pedagogy. In: Orey, M., Branch, R. (eds) Educational Media and Technology Yearbook. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14188-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics