Skip to main content

Hybridizing Infeasibility Driven and Constrained-Domination Principle with MOEA/D for Constrained Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization

  • Conference paper
Book cover Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (TAAI 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8916))

Abstract

This paper presents a novel multiobjective constraint handling approach, named as MOEA/D-CDP-ID, to tackle constrained optimization problems. In the proposed method, two mechanisms, namely infeasibility driven (ID) and constrained-domination principle (CDP) are embedded into a prominent multiobjective evolutionary algorithm called MOEA/D. Constrained-domination principle defined a domination relation of two solutions in constraint handling problem. Infeasibility driven preserves a proportion of marginally infeasible solutions to join the searching process to evolve offspring. Such a strategy allows the algorithm to approach the constraint boundary from both the feasible and infeasible side of the search space, thus resulting in gaining a Pareto solution set with better distribution and convergence. The efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approach are tested on several well-known benchmark test functions. In addition, the proposed MOEA/D-CDP-ID is applied to a real world application, namely design optimization of the two-stage planetary gear transmission system. Experimental results suggest that MOEA/D-CDP-ID can outperform other state-of-the-art algorithms for constrained multiobjective evolutionary optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 11(6), 712–731 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Runarsson, T.P., Yao, X.: Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 4(3), 284–294 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coello Coello, C.A.: Constraint-handling using an evolutionary multiobjective optimization technique. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 17(4), 319–346 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamida, S.B., Schoenauer, M.: An adaptive algorithm for constrained optimization problems. In: Deb, K., Rudolph, G., Lutton, E., Merelo, J.J., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P., Yao, X. (eds.) PPSN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1917, pp. 529–538. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cai, Z., Wang, Y.: A Multiobjective Optimization-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 10(6), 658–675 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ray, T., Singh, H.K., Isaacs, A., Smith, W.: Infeasibility driven evolutionary algorithm for constrained optimization. In: Mezura-Montes, E. (ed.) Constraint-Handling in Evolutionary Optimization. SCI, vol. 198, pp. 145–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu, Q., Min, R.: Mult-i objective optimal design study of the two-stage planetary gear transmission system s based on the MATLAB. Modern Manufacturing Engineering (3), 98–101 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C.M., Grunert da Fonseca, V.: Performance Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers: An Analisis and Review. Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Tech. Rep. 139 (June 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, C.-A.: New Multi-Objective Constrained Optimization Evolutionary Algorithm. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Innovative Computing Information and Control ICICIC 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, M., Zou, X., Chen, Y., Wu, Z.: Performance assessment of DMOEA-DD with CEC 2009 MOEA competition test instances. In: Proc. IEEE Congress Evolutionary Computation CEC 2009, pp. 2913–2918 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. del Castillo, J.M.: The Analytical Expression of the Efficiency of Planetary Gear Trains. Mechanism and Machine Theory (37), 197–214 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coello Coello, C.A., Cruz Cort´es, N.: Solving Multiobjective Optimization Problems using an Artificial Immune System. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 6(2), 163–190 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schütze, O., Esquivel, X., Lara, A., Coello, C.A.C.: Using the averaged hausdorff distance as a performance measure in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 16(4), 504–522 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Y., Cai, Z.: Combining multiobjective optimization withdifferential evolution to solve constrained optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 16(1), 117–134 (2012a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Y., Cai, Z.: A dynamic hybrid framework for constrained evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 42(1), 203–217 (2012b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, H., Zhang, Q.: Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated Pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 13(2), 284–302 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deb, K.: An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 186, 311–338 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lin, H. et al. (2014). Hybridizing Infeasibility Driven and Constrained-Domination Principle with MOEA/D for Constrained Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization. In: Cheng, SM., Day, MY. (eds) Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence. TAAI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13987-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13987-6_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13986-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13987-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics