Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Observing Parents Interact with Children: All Too Infrequently Asked Questions (and Answers)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Child Custody

Abstract

A prominent criticism of custody evaluation is that it represents evaluator value judgment only. The risk of reliance on personal attitudes is higher in parent–child observations than in other evaluative methods. A question and answer format is used to highlight an integration of empirical evidence and professional practice. Areas of focus include objectives for observation sessions, consideration of parenting theory and research, what family members to have present, number of sessions, tasks, and how to cognitively process information. Pros and cons of office observations versus home visits are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, M. A., & Pritzl, T. B. (2011). Child custody evaluation practices: A 20-year follow-up. Family Court Review, 49, 618–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, M. J. (1995). Clinician’s guide to child custody evaluations. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. American Psychologist, 65, 863–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC) (2006). Model standards of practice for child custody evaluation. Madison: AFCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, S. T., Lauretti, A. F., & Loding, B. V. (1998). The evaluation of parental fitness and termination of parental rights cases: A functional-contextual perspective. Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 1, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst, K., Gottfried, A. W., & Gottfried, A. D. (1997). Normative data for the MMPI-2 in child custody litigation. Psychological Assessment, 9, 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1966). Effect of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37, 887–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavers, W. R., & Hampson, R. B. (1990). Successful families: Assessment and intervention. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousha, D. M., & Twentyman, C. T. (1984). Mother-child interaction style in abuse, neglect, and control groups: Naturalistic observations in the home. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 106–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bow, J. N., & Quinnell, F. A. (2001). Psychologists’ current practices and procedures in child custody evaluations: Five years after American Psychological Association Guidelines. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, K. S., Clark, J., & Connell, M. A. (2011). Evaluation of parenting capacity in child protection. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cerezo, M. A., D’Ocon, K., & Dolz, L. (1996). Mother-child interactive patterns in abusive families versus nonabusive families: Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 573–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience- sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 487–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich-MacLean, G., & Walden, T. (1988). Distinguishing teaching interactions of physically abusive from nonabusive parent-child dyads. Child Abuse and Neglect, 12, 469–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, R. E., Otto, R. K., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2005). A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: Limited science and a flawed system. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, C., Vuchinich, S., & Kneedler, B. (2001). Assessing families with the family problem solving code. In P. K. Kerig & K. M. Lindahl (Eds.), Family observational coding systems (pp. 59–75). Mahweh: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin, J. N., Polansky, N. A., Kilpatrick, A. C., & Shilton, P. (1996). Family functioning in neglectful families. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 363–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (2010). Guidance for improving forensic reports: A review of common errors. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 102–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynan, D. J. (2002). Child health and safety factors in custody evaluations. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynan, D. J. (2003a). Forensic child evaluations. In L. VandeCreek & T. L. Jackson (Eds.). Innovations in clinical practice: Focus on children and families (pp. 63–81). Sarasota: Professional Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynan, D. J. (2003b). Parent-child observations in custody evaluations. Family Court Review, 41, 214–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynan, D. J. (2013). Use of the Personality assessment inventory in child custody evaluation. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 5, 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerig, P. K. (2001). Introduction and overview: Conceptual issues in family observational research. In P. K. Kerig & K. M. Lindahl (Eds.), Family observational coding systems: Resources for systemic research (pp. 1–22). Mahweh: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, D. A., & Sales, B. D. (2000). Legal standards, expertise, and experts in the resolution of contested child custody cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 843–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, K. M., & Malik, N. M. (1996). System for Coding Interactions and Family Functioning (SCIFF). Unpublished manuscript, University of Miami, Miami, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, K. M., & Malik, N. M. (1999). Marital conflict, family processes, and boys’ externalizing behavior in Hispanic American and European American families. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28, 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 1–101). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J. M., Pickens, J., & Stewart, K. L. (1996). Inventoried and observed stress in parent-child interactions. Current Psychology, 15, 232–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, S. J., Klein, K. R., Epstein, L. L. H., & McCurley, J. (1993). Effects of setting and number of observations on generalizability of parent-child interactions in childhood obesity treatment. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 15, 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. (1979). Uniform marriage and divorce act. St. Paul: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldershaw, L., Walters G. C., & Hall, D. K. (1989). A behavioral approach to the classification of different types of physically abusive mothers. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 255–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorbaugh, J. B. (2008). A comprehensive guide to child custody evaluations: Mental health and legal perspectives. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene: Castalia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals. Wash-ington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, B. M., Dixon, E. B., Lindenberger, J. C., & Ruther, N. J. (1989). Solomon’s sword: A practical guide to conducting child custody evaluations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, P. M. (2011). Conducting child custody evaluations: From basic to complex issues. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuchinich, S., Angelelli, J., & Gatherum, A. (1996). Context and development in family problem solving with preadolescent children. Child Development, 67, 1276–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinfield, N. S., Ogawa, J. R., & Egeland, B. (2002). Predictability of observed mother-child interaction from preschool to middle school in a high-risk sample. Child Development, 73, 528–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. R., Rack, J. J., Shi, X., & Norris, A. M. (2008). Comparing physically abusive, neglectful, and non-maltreating parents during interactions with their children: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 897–911.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 200 S. Main St., 60540, Naperville, IL, USA

    Daniel J. Hynan Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Daniel J. Hynan Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Hynan Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Northbrook, IL, USA

    Mark L. Goldstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hynan, D. (2016). Observing Parents Interact with Children: All Too Infrequently Asked Questions (and Answers). In: Goldstein, M. (eds) Handbook of Child Custody. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13942-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation