Abstract
This chapter discusses the best interest factors, from an historical perspective as well as from a current perspective. A review of the tender year’s doctrine, the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (UMDA) and the variability of current policy from state to state are offered. The best interest factors are delineated from several states, including Illinois, Michigan, and Florida. The majority of states have established best interest factors to be considered in making recommendations regarding custody and visitation. These factors include the wishes of each parent and their rationale, the wishes of the child as to his or her preferred custodian, and the interaction and interrelationship of the child with his or her parents, siblings, and significant others who may affect the child. In addition, other factors include the mental and physical health of the parents, the child’s adjustment to the home, school and community as well as the willingness of each parent to facilitate a relationship with the other parent. Domestic violence, child abuse, and substance abuse are often considered as well. Some states also assess the stability of the environment, the role of each parent historically in the child’s life, the capacity of each parent to provide the child with medical care, clothing, food and remedial care, as well as the moral fitness of each parent. Specific situations, such as removal, are also addressed from a best interest perspective. Finally, the challenges to the evaluator in assessing best interest factors are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, M. J. (2001). Clinician’s guide to child custody evaluations, (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Ainsworth, M. D. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Bowids, H. C. (2004). The implication of psychological evaluations in judicial custody determination when applying the best interest standard. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 64(10–B), 5208.
Bowlby, J. (1951). Maternal care and mental health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Emery, R., Otto, R., & O’Donohue, W. (2005). A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: Limited science and a flawed system. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(1), 1–29.
Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1984). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press.
Hippensteele, K. A. (2011). “Best interest” analysis and the power of legal language. In K.A. Davis (Ed.) Agency and advocacy. Contemporary language education (pp. 39–59). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing,.
Kelly, J., & Lamb, M. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family Court Review, 38(3), 297–311.
Klein, A. (2005). The rights of parents and stepparents: toward a redefinition of parental rights and obligations. In L. Gunsberg & P. Hymowitz (Eds.) A handbook of divorce and custody: Forensic, developmental and clinical perspectives (pp. 143–150) New York: The Analytic Press..
LoCascio, C. L. (2011). A comparison study of the decision-making processes of family court judges and child custody evaluators in Southern California. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 72(6–B), 3748.
Ludolph, P. (2009). Answered and unanswered questions in attachment theory with implications for children of divorce. Journal of Child Custody, 6(1–2), 8–24.
Stahl, P. (2011). Conducting child custody evaluations: from basic to complex issues. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Stevenson, M., Braver, S. L., Ellman, I. M. & Vortuba, A. M. (2013). Fathers, divorce and child custody. In N.J. Cabrera & T.S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.) Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 379–396). New York: Routledge..
Warshak, R. A. (2013). In a land far, far away: Assessing children’s best interests in international relocation cases. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues and Practices, 10(3–4), 295–324.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goldstein, M. (2016). Best Interest Factors in Child Custody Evaluations. In: Goldstein, M. (eds) Handbook of Child Custody. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13942-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13942-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13941-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13942-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)