Skip to main content

Best Interest Factors in Child Custody Evaluations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Child Custody

Abstract

This chapter discusses the best interest factors, from an historical perspective as well as from a current perspective. A review of the tender year’s doctrine, the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (UMDA) and the variability of current policy from state to state are offered. The best interest factors are delineated from several states, including Illinois, Michigan, and Florida. The majority of states have established best interest factors to be considered in making recommendations regarding custody and visitation. These factors include the wishes of each parent and their rationale, the wishes of the child as to his or her preferred custodian, and the interaction and interrelationship of the child with his or her parents, siblings, and significant others who may affect the child. In addition, other factors include the mental and physical health of the parents, the child’s adjustment to the home, school and community as well as the willingness of each parent to facilitate a relationship with the other parent. Domestic violence, child abuse, and substance abuse are often considered as well. Some states also assess the stability of the environment, the role of each parent historically in the child’s life, the capacity of each parent to provide the child with medical care, clothing, food and remedial care, as well as the moral fitness of each parent. Specific situations, such as removal, are also addressed from a best interest perspective. Finally, the challenges to the evaluator in assessing best interest factors are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, M. J. (2001). Clinician’s guide to child custody evaluations, (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. D. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowids, H. C. (2004). The implication of psychological evaluations in judicial custody determination when applying the best interest standard. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 64(10–B), 5208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1951). Maternal care and mental health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, R., Otto, R., & O’Donohue, W. (2005). A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: Limited science and a flawed system. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1984). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippensteele, K. A. (2011). “Best interest” analysis and the power of legal language. In K.A. Davis (Ed.) Agency and advocacy. Contemporary language education (pp. 39–59). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J., & Lamb, M. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family Court Review, 38(3), 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (2005). The rights of parents and stepparents: toward a redefinition of parental rights and obligations. In L. Gunsberg & P. Hymowitz (Eds.) A handbook of divorce and custody: Forensic, developmental and clinical perspectives (pp. 143–150) New York: The Analytic Press..

    Google Scholar 

  • LoCascio, C. L. (2011). A comparison study of the decision-making processes of family court judges and child custody evaluators in Southern California. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 72(6–B), 3748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludolph, P. (2009). Answered and unanswered questions in attachment theory with implications for children of divorce. Journal of Child Custody, 6(1–2), 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, P. (2011). Conducting child custody evaluations: from basic to complex issues. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M., Braver, S. L., Ellman, I. M. & Vortuba, A. M. (2013). Fathers, divorce and child custody. In N.J. Cabrera & T.S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.) Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 379–396). New York: Routledge..

    Google Scholar 

  • Warshak, R. A. (2013). In a land far, far away: Assessing children’s best interests in international relocation cases. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues and Practices, 10(3–4), 295–324.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark L. Goldstein Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goldstein, M. (2016). Best Interest Factors in Child Custody Evaluations. In: Goldstein, M. (eds) Handbook of Child Custody. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13942-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics