Skip to main content

Empirically Assisted Assessment of Family Systems: The Bricklin Scales

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Child Custody

Abstract

Our system combines quantified (formal) procedures and informal models. While not data based, semiformal models have many advantages. They guarantee that somewhere in one’s assessment similar data will be gathered from each main participant. Without this, meaningful comparisons are difficult if not impossible to make. Free-form interviews, for example, do not allow meaningful comparisons. This model guarantees that an evaluator will assess every area deemed pertinent in legal and psychological writings, including especially statutory and case law guidelines from the state of jurisdiction, and not unwittingly (or subjectively) fail to consider relevant information. Because these pertinent areas are articulated, they can be challenged as well as continually fine-tuned. Information about parenting knowledge and skills is gathered. The Parent Awareness Skills Survey (PASS), a series of questions asking how a parent would handle critical childhood situations, reflects a parent’s awareness of optimum childcare strategies. The Parent Perception of Child Profile (PPCP) and the Assessment of Parenting Skills: Infant and Preschooler (APSIP) reveal the degree to which a parent is attuned to the developmental and unique needs of a particular child. These tools ask about the range, depth, and specificity of the information each parent has about the child’s daily routine, interpersonal relations, health, developmental history, school issues, fears, personal hygiene, communication style, and disciplinary matters. The Bricklin–Elliot Home Visit Booklet guides home studies, including the investigation of complex topics like relocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, M. J., & Ackerman, M. C. (1997). Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited). Professional Psychology Research & Practice, 28, 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Ackoff’s best. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B. (1984). The Bricklin Perceptual scales. Furlong: Village Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B. (1989). The Perception-of-Relationships Test. Furlong: Village Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B. (1992). Data based tests in custody evaluations. American Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 254–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B. (1995). The custody evaluation handbook. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B. (1997). Test manuals supplement update. Furlong: Village Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B. (1998). Sequence of steps and critical assessment targets of a comprehensive custody evaluation. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill III (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (pp. 449–502). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B. (1999). The contribution of psychological tests to custody-relevant evaluations. In R. M. Galatzer-Levy & L. Kraus (Eds.), The scientific basis of child custody decisions (pp. 120–156). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B. (2002). The frequency of appearance of twenty-three PORT signs among four groups representing different degrees of parental competence. Furlong: Village Publishing..

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B., & Bricklin, P. M. (1999). Custody data as decision-theory information: Evaluating a psychological contribution by its value to a decision-maker. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 6, 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (1995). ACCESS: A comprehensive custody evaluation standard system. Furlong: Village Publishing..

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (2000). Qualifications of and techniques to be used by judges, attorneys and mental health professionals who deal with children in high conflict divorce cases. University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review, 122, 501–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (2001). The BPS and PORT. Furlong: Village Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (2002a). What can empirical data on 4,500 child custody cases tell us? Presented at the American College of Forensic Psychology, San Francisco, CA, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (2002b). The Perception-of-Relationships Tests (PORT) and Bricklin Perceptual Scales (BPS). Furlong: Village Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B., & Halbert, M. (2004a). Can child custody data be generated scientifically? American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricklin, B., & Halbert, M. (2004b). Perception-of-Relationships Test and Bricklin Perceptual Scales: Validity and reliability. American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, D. B., & Deutsch, R. (1999). Children and high conflict divorce: Theory, research, and intervention. In R. M. Galatzer-Levy & L. Kraus (Eds.), The scientific basis of child custody decisions (pp. 425–440). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, C. F. (1993). Test characteristics of custody-visitation litigants: A data-based description of relationship disorders. In: Empirical approaches to child custody determination, S. Podrygula (Chair). Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, C. F. (1997). Perpetually battling parents. In B. Mark & J. Incoravia (Eds.), The handbook of infant/child and adolescent psychotherapy, (Vol. 2, pp. 485–501). Northvale: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, C. F., & Kenney, L. (1994). Characteristics of custody litigants: Data from the southern California group. Presented at the meeting of the Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, C. F., & Kenney, L. (1995). MMPI-2 and Rorschach profiles of custody litigants: An intercorrelational study. Presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, C. F., & Kenney, L. (1997). Therapeutic intervention in high conflict divorce: Countertransference and the horrible decision. Presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. B., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerig, P. K., & Lindahl, K. M. (Eds.). (2001). Family observational coding systems. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, D. A., & Sales, B. D. (2000). Legal standards, expertise and experts in the resolution of contested child custody cases. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6, 843–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahey, B. B., Conger, R. D., Atkeson, B. M., & Trieber, F. A. (1984). Parenting behavior and emotional status of physically abusive mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 1062–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., & Barcus, E. (2002). Use of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 312–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., & Biringen, Z. (2001). Another look at the developmental research: Commentary on Kelly and Lamb’s “Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children.” Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 39, 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act. (1979). Uniform laws annotated.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry Bricklin PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bricklin, B., Elliot, G. (2016). Empirically Assisted Assessment of Family Systems: The Bricklin Scales. In: Goldstein, M. (eds) Handbook of Child Custody. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13942-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics