Abstract
Our system combines quantified (formal) procedures and informal models. While not data based, semiformal models have many advantages. They guarantee that somewhere in one’s assessment similar data will be gathered from each main participant. Without this, meaningful comparisons are difficult if not impossible to make. Free-form interviews, for example, do not allow meaningful comparisons. This model guarantees that an evaluator will assess every area deemed pertinent in legal and psychological writings, including especially statutory and case law guidelines from the state of jurisdiction, and not unwittingly (or subjectively) fail to consider relevant information. Because these pertinent areas are articulated, they can be challenged as well as continually fine-tuned. Information about parenting knowledge and skills is gathered. The Parent Awareness Skills Survey (PASS), a series of questions asking how a parent would handle critical childhood situations, reflects a parent’s awareness of optimum childcare strategies. The Parent Perception of Child Profile (PPCP) and the Assessment of Parenting Skills: Infant and Preschooler (APSIP) reveal the degree to which a parent is attuned to the developmental and unique needs of a particular child. These tools ask about the range, depth, and specificity of the information each parent has about the child’s daily routine, interpersonal relations, health, developmental history, school issues, fears, personal hygiene, communication style, and disciplinary matters. The Bricklin–Elliot Home Visit Booklet guides home studies, including the investigation of complex topics like relocation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackerman, M. J., & Ackerman, M. C. (1997). Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited). Professional Psychology Research & Practice, 28, 137–145.
Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Ackoff’s best. New York: Wiley.
Bricklin, B. (1984). The Bricklin Perceptual scales. Furlong: Village Publishing.
Bricklin, B. (1989). The Perception-of-Relationships Test. Furlong: Village Publishing.
Bricklin, B. (1992). Data based tests in custody evaluations. American Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 254–265.
Bricklin, B. (1995). The custody evaluation handbook. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Bricklin, B. (1997). Test manuals supplement update. Furlong: Village Publishing.
Bricklin, B. (1998). Sequence of steps and critical assessment targets of a comprehensive custody evaluation. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill III (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (pp. 449–502). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bricklin, B. (1999). The contribution of psychological tests to custody-relevant evaluations. In R. M. Galatzer-Levy & L. Kraus (Eds.), The scientific basis of child custody decisions (pp. 120–156). New York: Wiley.
Bricklin, B. (2002). The frequency of appearance of twenty-three PORT signs among four groups representing different degrees of parental competence. Furlong: Village Publishing..
Bricklin, B., & Bricklin, P. M. (1999). Custody data as decision-theory information: Evaluating a psychological contribution by its value to a decision-maker. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 6, 339–343.
Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (1995). ACCESS: A comprehensive custody evaluation standard system. Furlong: Village Publishing..
Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (2000). Qualifications of and techniques to be used by judges, attorneys and mental health professionals who deal with children in high conflict divorce cases. University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review, 122, 501–528.
Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (2001). The BPS and PORT. Furlong: Village Publishing.
Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (2002a). What can empirical data on 4,500 child custody cases tell us? Presented at the American College of Forensic Psychology, San Francisco, CA, April.
Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (2002b). The Perception-of-Relationships Tests (PORT) and Bricklin Perceptual Scales (BPS). Furlong: Village Publishing.
Bricklin, B., & Halbert, M. (2004a). Can child custody data be generated scientifically? American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 119–138.
Bricklin, B., & Halbert, M. (2004b). Perception-of-Relationships Test and Bricklin Perceptual Scales: Validity and reliability. American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 189–203.
Doolittle, D. B., & Deutsch, R. (1999). Children and high conflict divorce: Theory, research, and intervention. In R. M. Galatzer-Levy & L. Kraus (Eds.), The scientific basis of child custody decisions (pp. 425–440). New York: Wiley.
Hoppe, C. F. (1993). Test characteristics of custody-visitation litigants: A data-based description of relationship disorders. In: Empirical approaches to child custody determination, S. Podrygula (Chair). Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August.
Hoppe, C. F. (1997). Perpetually battling parents. In B. Mark & J. Incoravia (Eds.), The handbook of infant/child and adolescent psychotherapy, (Vol. 2, pp. 485–501). Northvale: Aronson.
Hoppe, C. F., & Kenney, L. (1994). Characteristics of custody litigants: Data from the southern California group. Presented at the meeting of the Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA, August.
Hoppe, C. F., & Kenney, L. (1995). MMPI-2 and Rorschach profiles of custody litigants: An intercorrelational study. Presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY, August.
Hoppe, C. F., & Kenney, L. (1997). Therapeutic intervention in high conflict divorce: Countertransference and the horrible decision. Presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL, August.
Kelly, J. B., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 297–311.
Kerig, P. K., & Lindahl, K. M. (Eds.). (2001). Family observational coding systems. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Krauss, D. A., & Sales, B. D. (2000). Legal standards, expertise and experts in the resolution of contested child custody cases. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6, 843–879.
Lahey, B. B., Conger, R. D., Atkeson, B. M., & Trieber, F. A. (1984). Parenting behavior and emotional status of physically abusive mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 1062–1071.
Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., & Barcus, E. (2002). Use of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 312–340.
Solomon, J., & Biringen, Z. (2001). Another look at the developmental research: Commentary on Kelly and Lamb’s “Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children.” Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 39, 355–364.
Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act. (1979). Uniform laws annotated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bricklin, B., Elliot, G. (2016). Empirically Assisted Assessment of Family Systems: The Bricklin Scales. In: Goldstein, M. (eds) Handbook of Child Custody. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13942-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13942-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13941-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13942-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)