Skip to main content

Postoperative Complications and Their Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Extreme Hepatic Surgery and Other Strategies

Abstract

In the last 2 decades, the results of hepatic resections (HR) have significantly improved. This improvement was possible because of the development of new anesthetic techniques, better postoperative care, better patient selection, the development of new technological devices and the specialization of hepatobiliary surgery units. The low mortality in referral centers has extended indication for HRs, allowing surgeons to perform extreme procedures in patients considered unresectable 20 years ago. These extreme procedures include associated vascular resections and reconstruction, ex vivo surgeries and the simultaneous resection of adjacent organs. The incidence of complications and perioperative mortality varies in the literature, between 15–45% and 0–25% respectively. The different criteria used to define morbidity as well as the inclusion (or not) of mild complications (Dindo-Clavien’s Grade 1 and 2) explains in part the variability of morbidity rates in the literature. Different factors have been associated with the development of postoperative complications: blood loss, number of resected segments, preoperative hypoalbuminemia, renal insufficiency, associated biliary procedures, associated vascular procedures, male gender and associated patients comorbidities. In addition, the experience of the surgical team, type of tumor, the moment of indication (elective, urgency, emergency resection), extent of resection, parenchymal quality of the liver (steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, post-chemotherapy changes) and patient selection are also key aspects. Reoperations to solve postoperative complications vary between 3 and 19%. The most frequent cause of reoperations is postoperative bleeding and intra-abdominal collections. In this chapter, local specific postoperative complications related to HR are described along with their specific management and prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hammond JS, Guha IN, Beckingham IJ, et al. Prediction, prevention and management of postresection liver failure. Br J Surg. 2011;98(9):1188–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the international study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149(5):713–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage:A definition and grading by the international study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(8):528–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the international study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011;149(5):680–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paik WH, Loganathan N, Hwang JH. Preoperative biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: when and how? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;6(3):68–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan S, Liu C, Mau L, et al. Value of live donor liver transplantation experience in major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2003;138:265–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimick J, Pronovost P, Cowan J, et al. Postoperative complications rates after hepatic resection in Maryland hospitals. Arch Surg. 2003;138:41–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarnagin W, Mithat G, Fong Y, et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann. Surg. 2002;236(4):397–407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Pekolj M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pekolj, J., Palavecino, M., Ardiles, V. (2017). Postoperative Complications and Their Management. In: de Santibañes, E., Ardiles, V., Alvarez, F., Busnelli, V., de Santibañes, M. (eds) Extreme Hepatic Surgery and Other Strategies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13896-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13896-1_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13895-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13896-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics