Skip to main content

Teaching Epidural for Labor Analgesia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Teaching and learning in anesthesiology is a demanding and complex task because the majority of the teaching and learning takes place in clinical settings, where the safety and comfort of the patient must be balanced against the responsibility for the education of the trainee. Teaching and learning epidural for labor analgesia can be especially demanding because the patient may be in severe pain and therefore be unwilling to participate in a teaching encounter. Also, the clinical setting in a delivery room where relatives are present may not be a comfortable environment for teaching and learning. Epidural for labor analgesia can therefore be difficult to teach and learn in a clinical setting and is a challenge to both the teacher and the trainee [1, 2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Spencer J (2003) Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. BMJ 326(7389):591–594

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramani S, Leinster S (2008) AMEE guide no. 34: teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach 30(4):347–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman Z, Siddiqui N, Katznelson R, Devito I, Bould MD, Naik V (2009) Clinical impact of epidural anesthesia simulation on short- and long-term learning curve: high- versus low-fidelity model training. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34(3):229–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Skeff KM (1998) Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers. Acad Med 73(6):688–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N (1992) A five-step “Microskills” model of clinical teaching. J Am Board Fam Pract 5(4):419–424

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frank JR (2005) The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework: better standards, better physicians, better care. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa. www.RCPSC.medical.org

  7. Ringsted C, Hansen TL, Davis D et al (2006) Are some of the challenging aspects of the CanMEDS roles valid outside Canada? Med Educ 40:807–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. https://sundhedsstyrelsen.dk/en/news/2013/~/media/39D3E216BCBF4A9096B286EE44F03691.ashx

  9. Royal Australian College of Surgeons, Nine RACS competencies. www.surgeons.org/becoming-a-surgeon/surgical-education-training/competencies

  10. Flin RH, O’Connor P, Crichton M (2008) Safety at the sharp end: a guide to non-technical skills. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fletcher GCL, McGeorge P, Flin RH, Glavin RJ, Maran NJ (2002) The role of non-technical skills in anaesthesia: a review of current literature. Br J Anaesth 88:418–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB et al (2008) Debriefing as formative assessment: closing the performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med 15:1010–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V et al (2004) The Canadian adverse event study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 170:1678–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazzocco K, Petetti DB, Fong KT et al (2009) Surgical team behaviours and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 197:678–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y et al (2010) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 304:1693–1700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leighton BL (1989) A greengrocer’s model of the epidural space. Anesthesiology 70:368–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaughan N, Dubey VN, Wee MY, Isaacs R (2013) A review of epidural simulators: where are we today? Med Eng Phys 35(9):1235–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, Cregan P, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ (2008) A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 248(2):166–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Draycott T, Sibanda T, Owen I et al (2006) Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 113:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER et al (2008) Features and uses of high fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 27:10–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinwachs B (1992) How to facilitate a debriefing. Simul Gaming 23:186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Young A, Miller JP, Azarow K (2005) Establishing learning curves for surgical residents using cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis. Curr Surg 63(3):330–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Watterson LM, Hyde S, Bajenov S, Kennedy SE (2007) The training environment of junior anaesthetic registrars learning epidural labour analgesia in Australian teaching hospitals. Anaesth Intensive Care 35(1):38–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ten Cate O (2005) Enthrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ 39:1176–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Norcini J, Burch V (2007) Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE guide no 31. Med Teach 29:855–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grant J (2002) Learning needs assessments: assessing the need. BMJ 324:156–159

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ringsted C, Østergaard D, van der Vleuten CP (2003) Implementation of a formal in-training assessment programme in anaesthesiology and preliminary results of acceptability. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 47:1196–1203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Holmboe ES, Yepes M, Williams F, Huet SJ (2004) Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise. J Gen Intern Med 19:558–561

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kirkpatrick DL (1998) Evaluating training programs. Beret-Koehler, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  30. Birch L, Jones N, Doyle PM et al (2007) Obstetric skills drills: evaluation of teaching methods. Nurse Educ Today 27:915–922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwartz AJ (2010) Resident/fellow evaluation of clinical teaching: an essential ingredient of effective teacher development and educational planning. Anesthesiology 113(3):516–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Crosby RMHJ (2000) AMEE guide no 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer – the twelve roles of the teacher. Med Teach 22(4):334–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Surkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, Shiffer R (2008) What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Acad Med 83:452–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Holmboe ES, Fiebach NH, Galaty LA, Huot S (2001) Effectiveness of a focused educational intervention on resident evaluation from faculty a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 16:427–434

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Van der Hem-Stokroos NH, Daelmans HF, Van der Vleuten CP, Haarman HJ, Scherphier AL (2004) The impact of multi-faceted educational structuring on learning effectiveness in a surgical clerkship. Med Educ 38:879–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doris Østergaard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fuhrmann, L., Østergaard, H.T., Østergaard, D. (2015). Teaching Epidural for Labor Analgesia. In: Capogna, G. (eds) Epidural Labor Analgesia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13890-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13890-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13889-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13890-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics