Skip to main content

Design of Complex Programs as Sociotechnical Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Concurrent Engineering in the 21st Century

Abstract

Following the introduction of systems thinking concepts in Chap. 3, we demonstrate here the treatment of complex engineering projects as sociotechnical systems in practical engineering practice. This approach, called Project Design, enables concurrent engineering (CE) teams to foresee the influence of project architecture, behaviors, dependencies, and complexity on emergent performance, thereby reducing the occurrence of unpleasant surprises. We have seen in multiple industrial cases this method as a source of new thinking and practices relevant to CE, with supporting tools and processes. Past assumptions about standard work practices may be tested, including such factors as degree of concurrency, phasing, roles, technology decomposition, system interfaces, and risk and its reduction. If embedded behaviors, in interplay with the total project architecture, lead to surprising negative or positive performance, the design of the engineering project as a sociotechnical system begins with un-learning, then awareness, and then learning of the project approaches more likely to produce positive results. The design of concurrency is specific to the nature of the social and technical elements of the system and its architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moser B, Mori K, Suzuki H, Kimura F (1997) Global product development based on activity models with coordination distance features. In: Proceedings of the 29th international seminar on manufacturing systems, Osaka, pp 161–166

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bucciarelli L (1994) Designing engineers. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holt A (1989) Organizing computer use in the context of networks. In: COMPCON Spring’89. Thirty-fourth IEEE computer society international conference: intellectual leverage, digest of papers, pp 201–207

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oravec J (1996) Virtual individuals, virtual groups, vol 11. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Schein E (2006) Organizational culture and leadership, vol 356. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kerzner H (2013) Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mantel S, Meredith J, Shafer S, Sutton M (2011) Project management in practice, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christian A, Grasso K, Seering W (1996) Validation studies of an information-flow model of design. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ASME design engineering technical conferences

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baligh H, Burton R, Obel B (1996) Organizational consultant: creating a useable theory for organizational design. Manage Sci 42(12):1648–1662

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jin Y, Levitt R (1996) The virtual design team: a computational model of project organizations. Comput Math Organ Theor 2(3):171–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ni M, Luh P, Moser B (2008) An optimization-based approach for design project scheduling. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 5(3):394–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldratt EM (1997) Critical chain. North River Press, Great Barrington

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gharajedaghi J (2011) Systems thinking: managing chaos and complexity, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schrage M (1995) No more teams: mastering the dynamics of creative collaboration. Currency Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy M, Ward A (2003) Product development for the lean enterprise. Oaklea Press, Richmond

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kahane A (2004) Solving tough problems: an open way of talking, listening, and creating new realities. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moser BR, Wood RT, Hiekata K (2014) Risk management in the design of engineering as sociotechnical systems. In: Cha J et al (eds) Moving integrated product development to service clouds in global economy. Proceedings of the 21st ISPE Inc international conference on concurrent engineering, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 635–646

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan R. Moser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moser, B.R., Wood, R.T. (2015). Design of Complex Programs as Sociotechnical Systems. In: Stjepandić, J., Wognum, N., J.C. Verhagen, W. (eds) Concurrent Engineering in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13776-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13776-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13775-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13776-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics