How Agency Is Transformed in the Course of Social Transformation: Don’t Forget the Double Morphogenesis
In Volume II, I advanced the generative mechanism of late modernity as constituted by neo-capitalist market competition and the diffusion of digital science needing to work together, and resulting in intensified social morphogenesis. Digital scientists were concerned with the diffusion of their innovations and the economic vanguard with their own profitability. Their synergy pulled social morphogenesis in two different directions: a reinforcement of (win-lose) competition on the part of the economy and the promotion of new (win-win) opportunities (the Cyber-Commons) on the part of digital innovators. This explanation is more complex than empiricist accounts of the ‘rise of information society’.
Major changes in the social order simultaneously have repercussions upon agency through being differentially beneficial or prejudicial to existing social groups. This prompts their re-organization, regrouping some and de-grouping others, into new Corporate and Primary Agents through the concurrent ‘double morphogenesis’. This chapter examines the two processes together, showing that as the generative mechanism engages, Corporate Agency, in its attempt to sustain or transform the social system, is ineluctably drawn into sustaining or transforming the categories of Corporate and Primary Agents themselves. It is their interactions that explain why globally the T2–T3 phase is prolonged and their outcomes will be decisive for whether or not T4 is eventually reached and merits being called a Morphogenic society.
KeywordsSynergy Double morphogenesis Agential transformation Intellectual property Digital diffusion Cyber commons
- Archer, M. S. (1988). Culture and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Archer, M. S. (2014). The generative mechanism re-configuring late modernity in her (ed) Social morphogenesis, Vol. II, Chap. 5, Late modernity: Trajectories towards Morphogenic Society. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bauwens, M. (2009). The emergence of open design and open manufacturing. http://www.we-magazine.net/we-vol02
- Benkler, Y. (2006). Wealth of networks. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Benkler, Y., & Nussbaum, M. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 4(14), 394–419.Google Scholar
- Bitton, M. (2012). Re-thinking the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement’s criminal copyright enforcement measures. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 67–117.Google Scholar
- BlogPulse. (2011). http://archive.is/XHRF, 16 Feb 2011.
- Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Buitenhuis, A. J., Zelenika, I., Pierce, J. M. (2010). Open design-based strategies to enhance appropriate technology development. http://nciia.org/sites’default/files/pearce.pdf
- Byrne, C. (2012). What you read is not what you share. http://venturebeat.com/2012/08/23/bitly-realtime-hilary-mason/
- Carrigan, M. (2011). There’s more to life than sex? Difference and commonality within the asexual community. In Sexualities http://sex.sagepub.com/content/14/4/462
- Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Colledge, B., Morgan, J., Tench, R. (2014). The concept(s) of trust in late modernity, the relevance of realist social theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44(4), 481–503.Google Scholar
- Economic effects of intellectual property-intensive manufacturing in the United States. http://web.archive.org/web20080216195041/http://www.the-value-of-ip.org/
- Fisher, W. W. (1999). The growth of intellectual property: A history of the ownership of ideas in the United States. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
- Hollis, M. (1987). The cunning of reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- International Labour Organization. (2012). Global estimate of forced labour: Results and methodology. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
- Jefferson, T. (1813). Letter to Isaac McPherson. http://presspubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a1_8_8s12.html. 13 Aug 1813.
- Khandani, A., & Lo, A. (2007). What happened to the Quants in August 2007? http://ssrn.com. id-1015987Google Scholar
- Lenhart, A. et al. (2010). Social media and young adults. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx
- Morgan, J., & Negru, I. (2012). The Austrian perspective on the global financial crisis: A critique. Economic Issues, 17(2), 22–55.Google Scholar
- Open Source Summit. (1998). http://linuxgazette.net/issue 28/rossum.html. (downloaded 25.10.2012)
- OpenSourceMalaria. (2014). http://openwetware.org/wiki/OSDDMalaria. (downloaded 18.03.2013)
- Poeter, D. (2012). Could a ‘Printable Gun’ change the world?. http://forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/. (downloaded 27.08.2012)
- Project Gutenberg – free ebooks. (2014). http://www.gutenberg.org/. (downloaded 25.10.2012)
- Rennie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. (2003). The roaring nineties. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2007). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
- The Tropical Disease Initiative (2014). http://www.tropicaldisease.org. (downloaded 25.10.2012)
- Tiemann, M. (2006). ‘History of the OSI’, open source initiative. http://www.opensource.org/history
- Trippi, J. (2004). The revolution will not be televised. New York: William Morrow/HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Wharton, D. (1992). MPAA’s rebel with cause fights for copyright coin. Variety, 348, 2.Google Scholar
- Wikipedia. (2013) ‘Open Source’, p.1. http://en.wickipedia.org/wiki/Open_source. (downloaded 13.11.2013).
- Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_networking-service. (downloaded 20.11.2013)
- World Intellectual Property Organization. (2002). Human rights and intellectual property. http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/hr/