Advertisement

“Mechanisms” at Work in Information Society

  • Wolfgang HofkirchnerEmail author
Part of the Social Morphogenesis book series (SOCMOR)

Abstract

This chapter deals with “mechanisms” from the perspective of critical systems thinking. “Mechanisms” are rooted in self-organisation. Far from being mechanical, they are contingent dynamisms. They are the cause of the advent of Information Society; they are the cause for the reproduction of Information Society; and they are the cause of a transformation of Information Society.

After explicating critical systems thinking with reference to aims, scope and tools of social science, a critical review of positivist, interpretivist, postmodern and critical theories to explaining the build-up of information society is given. All but the last focus on one side of a purported dynamic, instead of attempting to integrate several sides for which there is empirical evidence. An example of a dynamic is presented that is crucial for the advent of a Global Sustainable Information Society, which would deserve the label “Morphogenic Society”. The description of this dynamic makes creative use of the terms “antagonism”, “agonism” and “synergism” and explains what the author calls the Logic of the Third.

Keywords

Critical systems thinking Information and communication technologies and society Techno-determinism Social constructivism Mutual-shaping approach Conflict transformation Antagonism – Agonism – Synergism Logic of the third 

References

  1. Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloch, E. (1967). Das Prinzip Hoffnung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  4. Bunge, M. (2003). Emergence and convergence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, D. T. (1974). ‘Downward causation’ in hierarchically organized biological systems. In F. J. Ayala & T. Dobzhansky (Eds.), Studies in the philosophy of biology (pp. 179–186). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Castells, M. (1998). End of millennium. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Corning, P. (1983). The synergism hypothesis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Curtis, N. (2013). Idiotism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  12. de Kerckhove, D. (1998). Connected intelligence. London: KoganPage.Google Scholar
  13. Donati, P. (2011). Relational sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Floridi, L. (2007). A look into the future impact of ICTs on our lives. The Information Society, 23(1), 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Floridi, L. (2010). Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haken, H. (1978). Synergetics. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall, A. D., & Fagen, R. E. (1956). Definition of system. General Systems, 1, 18–28.Google Scholar
  18. Hofkirchner, W. (2010). A taxonomy of theories about ICTs and society. Triple-C, 8(2), 171–176.Google Scholar
  19. Hofkirchner, W. (2013a). Emergent information. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofkirchner, W. (2013b). Self-organisation as the mechanism of development and evolution in social systems. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis (pp. 125–143). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofkirchner, W. (2014a). On the validity of describing ‘morphogenic society’ as a system and justifiability of thinking about it as a social formation. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Late modernity (pp. 119–141). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hofkirchner, W. (2014b). Idiotism and the logic of the third. In M. Lakitsch (Ed.), Political power reconsidered – State power and civic activism between legitimacy and violence, peace report 2013 (pp. 55–76). Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Holling, E., & Kempin, P. (1989). Identität, Geist und Maschine – Auf dem Weg zur technologischen Zivilisation. Reinbek bei Hamburg. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  24. Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Campus: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  25. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1969). Dialektik der Aufklärung. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  26. Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Marx, K. (1852). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1852/18th-brumaire/ch01.htm. Accessed 31 Mar 2014.
  28. Marx, K. (1894). Capital, Vol. III. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/ch48.htm. Accessed 31 March 2014.
  29. Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Tudyka, K. P. (1973). Kritische Politikwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  31. von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems ScienceViennaAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Design and Technology AssessmentVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations