Advertisement

Ontology Design Pattern Property Specialisation Strategies

  • Karl Hammar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8876)

Abstract

Ontology Design Patterns (ODPs) show potential in enabling simpler, faster, and more correct Ontology Engineering by laymen and experts. For ODP adoption to take off, improved tool support for ODP use in Ontology Engineering is required. This paper studies and evaluates the effects of strategies for object property specialisation in ODPs, and suggests tool improvements based on those strategies. Results indicate the existence of three previously unstudied strategies for ODP specialisation, the uses of which affect reasoning performance and integration complexity of resulting ontologies.

Keywords

Specialisation Strategy Hybrid Strategy Reasoning Performance Reasoning Task Ontology Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aranguren, M.E., Antezana, E., Kuiper, M., Stevens, R.: Ontology Design Patterns for Bio-ontologies: A Case Study on the Cell Cycle Ontology. BMC Bioinformatics 9(suppl 5) (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blomqvist, E., Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Experiments on Pattern-based Ontology Design. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 41–48 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blomqvist, E., Sandkuhl, K.: Patterns in Ontology Engineering: Classification of Ontology Patterns. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pp. 413–416 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daga, E., Blomqvist, E., Gangemi, A., Montiel, E., Nikitina, N., Presutti, V., Villazon-Terrazas, B.: D2.5.2: Pattern Based Ontology Design: Methodology and Software Support. Tech. rep., NeOn Project (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dzbor, M., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Blomqvist, E., Lewen, H., Espinoza, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Palma, R.: D5.6.2 Experimentation and Evaluation of the NeOn Methodology. Tech. rep., NeOn Project (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Egaña, M., Rector, A.L., Stevens, R., Antezana, E.: Applying ontology design patterns in bio-ontologies. In: Gangemi, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) EKAW 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5268, pp. 7–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gangemi, A.: Ontology Design Patterns for Semantic Web Content. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 262–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horridge, M., Aranguren, M.E., Mortensen, J., Musen, M.A., Noy, N.F.: Ontology Design Pattern Language Expressivity Requirements. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Ontology Patterns (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kang, Y.-B., Li, Y.-F., Krishnaswamy, S.: Predicting reasoning performance using ontology metrics. In: Cudré-Mauroux, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7649, pp. 198–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keet, C.M.: Detecting and revising flaws in OWL object property expressions. In: ten Teije, A., Völker, J., Handschuh, S., Stuckenschmidt, H., d’Acquin, M., Nikolov, A., Aussenac-Gilles, N., Hernandez, N. (eds.) EKAW 2012. LNCS, vol. 7603, pp. 252–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Presutti, V., Blomqvist, E., Daga, E., Gangemi, A.: Pattern-Based Ontology Design. In: Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, pp. 35–64. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Presutti, V., Daga, E., Gangemi, A., Blomqvist, E.: eXtreme Design with Content Ontology Design Patterns. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Patterns (WOP), p. 83 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Presutti, V., Gangemi, A., David, S., Aguado de Cea, G., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Montiel-Ponsoda, E., Poveda, M.: D2.5.1: A Library of Ontology Design Patterns: Reusable Solutions for Collaborative Design of Networked Ontologies. Tech. rep., NeOn Project (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Taylor, K., Delaney, A., Burton, J., Chapman, P.: Towards diagrammatic ontology patterns. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Ontology and Semantic Web Patterns (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Urbani, J., Kotoulas, S., Maassen, J., van Harmelen, F., Bal, H.: OWL reasoning with webPIE: Calculating the closure of 100 billion triples. In: Aroyo, L., Antoniou, G., Hyvönen, E., ten Teije, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Cabral, L., Tudorache, T. (eds.) ESWC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6088, pp. 213–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Hammar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Information Engineering GroupJönköping UniversitySweden
  2. 2.Department of Computer and Information ScienceLinköping UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations