Advertisement

Facets and Typed Relations as Tools for Reasoning Processes in Information Retrieval

  • Winfried Gödert
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 478)

Abstract

Faceted arrangement of entities and typed relations for representing different associations between the entities are established tools in knowledge representation. In this paper, a proposal is being discussed combining both tools to draw inferences along relational paths. This approach may yield new benefit for information retrieval processes, especially when modeled for heterogeneous environments in the Semantic Web. Faceted arrangement can be used as a selection tool for the semantic knowledge modeled within the knowledge representation. Typed relations between the entities of different facets can be used as restrictions for selecting them across the facets.

Keywords

Knowledge representation Facets Typed relations Inferences Information retrieval 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Redmond-Neal, A., Hlava, M.M.K. (eds.): ASIS&T Thesaurus of Information Science, Technology and Librarianship, 3rd edn. Information Today, Medford (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment: the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 7(1), 67–102 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buxton, A.B.: Computer searching of UDC numbers. Journal of Documentation 46(3), 193–217 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garshol, L.M.: Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic maps!: making sense of it all. Journal of Information Science 30(4), 378–391 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gödert, W.: Die Dezimalklassifikation im Online-Retrieval. Nachrichten für Dokumentation 41(3), 155–158 (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gödert, W.: Ein Ontologie basiertes Modell für Indexierung und Retrieval. Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 65(2), S.83–S.98 (2014); an English version has been accepted for publication in the Journal ofthe Association for Information Science and Technology. A preliminary version can be found under: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4425
  7. 7.
    Gödert, W., Hubrich, J., Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval. DeGruyterSaur, Berlin (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Green, R., Bean, C.A.: Aligning systems of relationships. In: Raghavan, K.S., Prasad, K.N. (eds.) Knowledge Organization, Information Systems and Other Essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift, pp. 111–128. EssEss Publ., New Delhi (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Isaac, A., Summers, E.: SKOS simple knowledge organization system primer. W3C working group note (2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer (retrieved)
  10. 10.
    ISO 13250. Topic maps. Information technology. ISO, Geneva (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO 25964. Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies: Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies. ISO, Geneva (2011-2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michel, D.: Taxonomy of subject relationships (1997), Under: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf, Part of: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (June 1997), Under: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/finalreport.cfm
  13. 13.
    Miles, A., Bechhofer, S.: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System. W3C recommendation (2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference (retrieved)
  14. 14.
    Miles, A., Brickley, D.: SKOS mapping vocabulary specification (2004), http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mapping/spec/2004-11-11.html (retrieved)
  15. 15.
    Park, J., Hunting, S. (eds.): XML topic maps: creating and using topic maps for the Web. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pepper, S.: The TAO of topic maps: finding the way in the age of infoglut, Under: http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tao.html
  17. 17.
    Bean, C.A., Green, R. (eds.): Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Kluwer Academic, Boston (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shiri, A.: Powering search: the role of thesauri in new information environments. ASIST, Medford (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tudhope, D., Alani, H., Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships: possibilities for retrieval. Journal of Digital Information 1(8) (2001), under: https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/181Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Winfried Gödert
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Information ScienceCologne University of Applied SciencesCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations