Between the Colonial, the Global, and the Local—Civilizing India’s Past under Different Regimes

  • A. G. Krishna MenonEmail author
Part of the Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context book series (TRANSCULT)


This paper examines the colonial conservation policies and practices in India with a view towards analysing its contemporary relevance. Colonial imperatives have now transformed into universal values that are promoted by global inter-governmental agencies like UNESCO, thus perpetuating the elision of the indigenous building maintenance practices initiated by the colonial government. In 1984 the situation began to change with the establishment of the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH), a non-government institution. The professionals working for INTACH began to understand the relevance of the indigenous practices that had been used to look after the architectural heritage of the country for millennia. In 2004, INTACH collated its experiences in a Charter for the Conservation of Unprotected Architectural Heritage and Sites in India, in which it defined the role of indigenous building and maintenance practices alongside the universal ideology. The INTACH Charter is a significant departure from global conservation philosophies, as it offers a considered response to the consequences of the colonial civilizing mission on the conservation of Indian antiquities.


Conservation Practice Historic Building Historic City Indigenous Knowledge System Heritage Building 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). 1904. “The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act 1904. VII of 1904. As modified up to the 1st September 1949.” Gazetteer of India, 1904–1949. Accessed August 13, 2014.
  2. Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). 1958. “The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act. Act No. 24 of 1958.” The Gazette of India, Extraordinary Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), October 15, 1959. Accessed August 13, 2014.
  3. Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). 2010. “Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2010. No. 10 of 2010.” The Gazette of India, Extraordinary Part II, Section 1, March 30, 2010. Accessed August 13, 2014.
  4. Clark, Grahame. 1979. Sir Mortimer and Indian Archaeology. New Delhi: The Archaeological Survey of India.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, Michael. 1995. “Culture and Cognitive Development: From Crosscultural Research to Creating Systems of Cultural Mediation.” Culture and Psychology 1: 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denslagen, Wim, and Niels Gutschow, eds. 2005. Architectural Imitations, Reproductions and Pastiches in East and West. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Dutta, Arindam. 2007. The Bureaucracy of Beauty, Design in the Age of its Global Reproducibility. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Fitch, James Marston. 1990. Historic Preservation: Curatorial Management of the Built World. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hardy, Matthew, ed. 2009. Venice Charter Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  10. Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH). 2004. Charter for the Conservation of Unprotected Architectural Heritage and Sites in India. New Delhi: INTACH.Google Scholar
  11. Mantena, Karuna. 2010. Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marshall, John. 2006. Conservation Manual. A Handbook for the Use of Archaeological Officers and Other Entrusted with the care of Ancient Monuments. Johannesburg: Caxton Publications. Originally published 1923 at Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing.Google Scholar
  13. Menon, A. G. Krishna, and Balkrishna Thapar. 1988. Historic Towns and Heritage Zones. New Delhi: INTACH.Google Scholar
  14. Menon, A. G. Krishna. 1989. Cultural Identity and Urban Development. New Delhi: INTACH.Google Scholar
  15. Mill, James. 1858. The History of British India, London: Baldwin, Cradock and Joy.Google Scholar
  16. Mitter, Partha. 1977. Much Maligned Monsters. A History of European Reactions to Indian Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Morris, William. 2012. Manifesto for the Protection of Ancient Buildings, repr. In The Activities and Services of the Society, edited by the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings. London: Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings (SPAB). Originally published 1877.Google Scholar
  18. Sengupta, Indra. 2013. “A Conservation Code for the Colony: John Marshell’s Conservation Manual and Monument Preservation between India and Europe.” In Archaeologizing Heritage? Transcultural Entanglements between Local Social Practices and Global Virtual Realities, edited by Michael Falser and Monica Juneja, 21–37. Springer: Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London.Google Scholar
  19. Stubbs, John. 2009. Time Honored. A Global View of Architectural Conservation. Parameters, Theory and Evolution. Hoboken (NY): John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Thapar, Romila. 1996. Time as a Metaphor of History: Early India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tillotson, Giles Henry Rupert. 1989. The Tradition of Indian Architecture. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. The International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). 2014. Venice Charter – International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (1964). Accessed October 11, 2014.
  23. Wheeler, Mortimer. 1976. My Archaeological Mission in India and Pakistan. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations