Advertisement

Discourses and Practices between Traditions and World Heritage Making in Angkor after 1990

  • Keiko MiuraEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context book series (TRANSCULT)

Abstract

After three decades of civil war in Cambodia, Angkor was recaptured to serve the civilizing visions of a country that had re-emerged from barbarity and the decadence of its cultural heritage and traditions. In this sense, UNESCO’s international campaigns to “Save Angkor,” launched in 1991, and the subsequent World Heritage nomination in 1992 (Angkor was simultaneously inscribed on the list of World Heritage Sites in Danger) were to become civilizing missions that allowed Cambodia to be re-integrated into the international community of “civilized nations.” In the nearly two decades since, the focus of attention paid to Angkor by the Cambodian government and the international community has shifted from a rescue operation of the monuments and sites to a campaign on how to effectively utilize the heritage for economic development in the country. It has also involved questions of how to control people’s presence and activities in the site, which has necessitated the restriction of some “traditional” local practices. Many of the restrictions were imposed on the inhabitants for the sake of tourism development and the maintaining of the assumed ideal conditions of a World Heritage Site; that is, World Heritage-Making. Discourses have emerged about which traditions to respect and maintain, and which ones to restrict or abandon. At the same time, new traditions have been invented to suit the era of tourism development. This paper analyses the divergent and somewhat contradictory discourses and practices on traditions and “World Heritage-making” in Angkor, as demonstrated by various social actors, local, national, and international.

Keywords

World Heritage Tourism Development Heritage Site Local Inhabitant World Heritage Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

I owe a great deal of thanks to many individuals and organizations for their various contributions during my PhD research on Angkor heritage, local communities, tourism development, and heritage management (1998–2004). Although I am unable to list all the names here, I would like to make special mention of the UNESCO Office in Phnom Penh and the APSARA Authority for sharing knowledge, concerns, and data, as well as facilitating my research and participation in international conferences on Angkor. I would like to extend my special thanks to the Research Institute of Wet Rice Culture of Waseda University in Tokyo, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Promotion Research of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), and the interdisciplinary cultural property research group of Göttingen University for enabling me to continue my research in Angkor. Last, but not least, I acknowledge my debt of gratitude to the Cluster of Excellence, “Asia and Europe in a Global Context,” Heidelberg University, for their kind invitation to attend the 2nd International Workshop on Heritage in March 2011 and for including this paper in the proceedings.

References

  1. ABC Radio Australia News. 2002. “Monks Ordered to Leave Angkor Wat.” [June 14]Google Scholar
  2. ADI Team, et al. 2002. The Impact of the Tourism Industry in Siem Reap on the People Who Live in Angkor Park. Phnom Penh: Cooperation Committee for Cambodia, Analyzing Development Issues (ADI) Project.Google Scholar
  3. Ang, Chouléan, Eric Prenowitz, and Ashley Thompson. 1998. Angkor: A Manual for the Past, Present and Future. Phnom Penh: APSARA. First Edition 1995.Google Scholar
  4. APSARA Authority. 2005. Legal Framework Related to the Management of Cultural Protected Zones 1 & 2 of Siem Reap/Angkor Region. Phnom Penh: APSARA Authority.Google Scholar
  5. APSARA Authority. 2006. Royal Decree establishing Protected Cultural Zones. Zoning map. Accessed 22 October, 2014. http://www.autoriteapsara.org/images/apsara/about_apsara/zoning/zoning_map.jpg
  6. Arahi, Hisao. 2001. “Research in Banteay Kdei (2)––The Changes of the Naming of ‘Banteay Kdei’ and the Modern State of the Monument.” Renaissance Culturelle du Cambodge 18: 164–76. Original in Japanese.Google Scholar
  7. Baillie, Britt. 2005. Angkor Wat: Conserving the Sacred? A Relationship between Buddhism and Heritage Management. MA diss., University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Cambodge Soir. 2002. “Ordre de Démolition des Pagodes du Site d’Angkor.” [March 14]Google Scholar
  9. Clémentin-Ojha, Catherine, and Pierre-Yves Manguin. 2007. A Century in Asia: The History of the École Française d’Extrême Orient 1898–2006. Singapore: Didier Millet.Google Scholar
  10. Chandler, David P. 1992. A History of Cambodia. Colorado: Westview Press. First edition 1983.Google Scholar
  11. De Lopez, Thanakvaro, et al. 2006. Towards Sustainable Development in Angkor, Cambodia: Social, Environmental and Financial Aspects of Conserving Cultural Heritage [Research Report No. 2006-RR5]. Singapore: The Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA).Google Scholar
  12. Dieulefils, Pierre. 2001. Ruins of Angkor: Cambodia in 1909. Bangkok: River Books. Originally published in 1909.Google Scholar
  13. Ebihara, May M., Carol A. Mortland, and Judy Ledgerwood, eds. 1994. Cambodian Culture since 1975: Homeland and Exile. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, Penny. 2004. “Making a Religion of the Nation and Its Language: The French Protectorate (1863–1954) and the Dhammakāy.” In History, Buddhism, and New Religious Movements in Cambodia, edited by John Marston and Elizabeth Guthrie, 63–89. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  15. ——. 2007. Cambodge: The Cultivation of a Nation, 1860–1945. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  16. Esposito, Adèle, and Sylvia Nam. 2008. Siem-Reap: Urban Development in the Shadow of Angkor, briefing document for the 2008 Pacific Rim Council on Urban Development Forum, October 26–29, 2008. Siem Reap: The Getty Conservation Institute et al.Google Scholar
  17. Falser, Michael S. 2013a. “From a Colonial Reinvention to Postcolonial Heritage and a Global Commodity: Performing and Re-enacting Angkor Wat and the Royal Khmer Ballet.” International Journal of Heritage Studies. Accessed February 22, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/  10.1080/13527258.2013.794746.
  18. ——. 2013b. “From Colonial Map to Visitor’s Parcours: Tourist Guides and the Spatiotemporal Making of the Archaeological Park of Angkor.” ‘Archaeologizing’ Heritage? Transcultural Entanglements between Local Social Practices and Global Virtual Realities, edited by Michael Falser and Monica Juneja, 81–106. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York et al.: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  20. Headley, Robert K. Jr., and Chim Rath. 1977. Cambodian English Dictionary, vols. 1 and 2. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hing, Vutha, and Tuot Sokphally. 2007. “Pro-Poor Tourism: Siem Reap Case Study.” In Pro-Poor Tourism in the Greater Mekong Sub-Region, edited by the Cambodia Development Resource Institute (CDRI), 26–77. Phnom Penh: CDRI.Google Scholar
  22. Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. “Introduction: Inventing Traditions.” In The Invention of Tradition, edited by Eric Hobsbawm and Terrence Ranger, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and the Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM). 2003. ICCROM’s Living Heritage Site Programme. Rome: ICCROM.Google Scholar
  24. International Coordinating Committee for the Safeguarding and Development of the Historic Site of Angkor (ICC). 1998. Fourth Quadripartite Meeting. Phnom Penh: ICC-UNESCO.Google Scholar
  25. ——. 2004. International Coordinating Committee for the Safeguarding and Development of the Historic Site of Angkor (ICC). Eleventh Plenary Session. Phnom Penh: ICC-UNESCO.Google Scholar
  26. Khuon, Khun-Neay. 2006a. “A Commitment to Community Engagement.” In Phnom Bakheng Workshop on Public Interpretation, December 4–6, 2005, Conference Proceedings, 115–117. Siem Reap: World Monuments Fund and Center for Khmer Studies. Accessed September 17, 2011. http://www.wmf.org/sites/default/files/wmf_publication/Phnom_Bakheng_Workshop_on_Public_Interpretation.pdf.
  27. ——. 2006b. “Angkor––Site Management and Local Communities.” Paper presented at the Angkor – Landscape, City and Temple International Conference, July 17–22, 2006, University of Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  28. ——. 2008. Run Ta-Ek: Eco-Village for Sustainable Development. Concept Note of an Ecological Human Settlement, translated by Bun Hok LIM. Phnom Penh: APSARA AuthorityGoogle Scholar
  29. Lemaistre, Anne, and Sébastien Cavalier. 2002. “Analyses and Management Prospects of the International Angkor Programme.” Museum 54, 1&2: 117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lloyd, Georgina. 2009. The Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Law and Policy. PhD diss., University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  31. Logan, Godden Mackay. 2010. “Angkor Heritage Management Framework.” Accessed February 25, 2014 on the GML Heritage homepage.Google Scholar
  32. Luco, Fabienne. 2006. “The People of Angkor: Between Tradition and Development.” Phnom Bakheng Workshop on Public Interpretation, December 4–6, 2005, Conference Proceedings, 118–130. Siem Reap: World Monuments Fund and Center for Khmer Studies. Accessed September 17, 2011. http://www.wmf.org/sites/default/files/wmf_publication/Phnom_Bakheng_Workshop_on_Public_Interpretation.pdf.
  33. ——. 2013. “The Angkorian Palimpsest. The Daily Life of Villagers Living on a World Heritage Site.” ‘Archaeologizing’ Heritage? Transcultural Entanglements between Local Social Practices and Global Virtual Realities, edited by Michael Falser and Monica Juneja, 215–262. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Osborne, Milton. 1997. The French Presence in Cochinchina and Cambodia. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
  35. Miura, Keiko. 2004. “Contested Heritage: People of Angkor.” PhD diss., University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS).Google Scholar
  36. ——. 2011a. “Sustainable Development in Angkor. Conservation Regime of the Old Villagescape and Development.” In World Heritage Angkor and beyond: Circumstances and implications of UNESCO listings in Cambodia, edited by Brigitta Hauser-Schäublin, 121–46. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.Google Scholar
  37. ——. 2011b. Living with Angkor Heritage (published in Japanese under the title Ankōru isan to tomoni ikiru). Tokyo: Mekong.Google Scholar
  38. Palatino, Mong. 2009. Cambodia: Controversial Angkor Wat Lighting Project. Accessed February 24, 2013 on the homepage of Globalvoiceonline.Google Scholar
  39. Parsons, Keith D. 2000. “Resolving the Conflicts between Preservation, Car Management and Accessibility.” In Tourism and Heritage Relationships: Global, National and Local Perspectives, edited by Michael Robinson, et al., 349–62. Sunderland: Centre for Travel and Tourism & Business Education Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Ponchaud, François. 1978. Cambodia Year Zero. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  41. Porée-Maspero, Éveline. 1962. Étude sur les rites agraires des Cambodgiens, vol. 1. Paris: Mouton & Co. La Haye.Google Scholar
  42. Reuy, Rann. 2010a. “Apsara to File Suit in Land Row.” Phnom Penh Post, March 12, 2010, 6.Google Scholar
  43. ——. 2010b. “Complaint against Apsara Authority.” Phnom Penh Post, March 23, 2010, 4.Google Scholar
  44. Rooney, Dawn. 1994. A Guide to Angkor: An Introduction to the Temples. Hong Kong: Asia Books.Google Scholar
  45. Royal Government (of Cambodia). 2008. Sub-Decree regarding Organisation and Functioning of the Office of Director-General of the APSARA Authority. Phnom Penh: Royal Government of Cambodia.Google Scholar
  46. UNESCO. 1983. Conventions concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  47. ——. 1993. Safeguarding and Development of Angkor [prepared for the Inter-Governmental Conference on Angkor, Tokyo October 12–13, 1993]. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  48. ——. 2003. Text of the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Accessed September 27, 2011. http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/index.php?lg=en&pg=00006.
  49. ——. 2012. “The List: Success stories: Successful restoration.” Accessed September 1, 2012. http://whc.unesco.org/en/107.
  50. Warrack, Simon. 2013. “Developing Conservation Approaches to Living Heritage at Angkor: The Conservation of the Statue of Ta Reach.” In ‘Archaeologizing’ Heritage? Transcultural Entanglements between Local Social Practices and Global Virtual Realities, edited by Michael Falser and Monica Juneja, 217–32. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. ZEMP Expert Team. 1993. Zoning and Environmental Management Plan for Angkor (Discussion Draft). Phnom Penh: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Letters, Arts and SciencesWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations