Advertisement

Cultural Heritage as Civilizing Mission: Methodological Considerations

  • Michael FalserEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context book series (TRANSCULT)

Abstract

The self-legitimation of political regimes in modern history was and often still is attempted through a twofold strategy: (a) a normative assessment of the ruled country’s past and present, and (b) the enactment of a concrete committed action programme to guide the nation towards a better future. The interest in this dynamic of a normative (intro-)vision on the one hand, and—as a practical consequence—of an applied, action-oriented mission on the other, forms the basis of this volume’s thematic inquiry. Although this critical assessment of the past and present may encompass a wide variety of aspects (social, financial, moral, intellectual, etc.), our focus here is on the specific field of materialized culture, and in particular on the complex of architectural manifestations that crystallizes over time through a multiform process into a (supposedly) “representative,” (i.e. trans-generational and collective) cultural canon of the nation known as cultural heritage.

Keywords

Cultural Heritage World Heritage Khmer Rouge Hague Convention Historic Monument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adas, Michael. 2004. “Contested Hegemony: The Great War and the Afro-Asian Assault in the Civilizing Mission Ideology.” In: Decolonization. Perspectives from Now and Then, edited by Prasenjit Duara, 78–100. Routledge: London and New York.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Azm, Sadik Jalal. 1981. “Orientalism and Orientalism in reverse.” Khamsin. Revue des Socialistes révolutionnaires du Proche-Orient 8, 5–26.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Benedict. 1998. The Spectre of Comparisons. Nationalism, Southeast Asia and the World. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Bade, Klaus J. 1982. Imperialismus und Kolonialmission. Kaiserliches Deutschland und koloniales Imperium. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
  6. Bancel, Nicolas, Pascal Blanchard, and Françoise Vergès. 2003. La République coloniale. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  7. Barth, Boris, and Jürgen Osterhammel, eds. 2005. Zivilisierungsmissionen. Imperiale Weltverbesserung seit dem 18. Jahrhundert. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  8. Basalla, George. 1967. “The Spread of Western Science.” Science 156: 3775: 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bayly, C.A. 1998. “The First Age of Global Imperialism, c.1760–1830.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 26: 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Betts, Raymond. 1961. Assimilation and Association in French Colonial Theory 1890–1914. New York, London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. ——. 1982. “The French Colonial Empire and the French World-View.” In Racism and Colonialism, edited by Robert Ross, 65–77. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bloembergen, Marieke, and Remco Raben, eds. 2009. The Colonial Civilizing Mission. Trajectories to the New Indies, 1890–1950. Leiden: KITLV Uitgeverij. Orginal in Dutch.Google Scholar
  13. Bloembergen, Marieke and Martijn Eickhoff. 2013. “A Wind of Change on Java’s Ruined Temples. Archaeological Activities, Imperial Circuits and Heritage Awareness in Java and the Netherlands (1800–1850)” BMGN—Low Countries Historical Review 28: 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bouretz, Pierre. 2000. La République et l’universel. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  15. Celik, Zeynep. 1992. Displaying the Orient: Architecture at Nineteenth-Century World’s Fairs. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chafer, Tony, and Amanda Sackur, eds. 2002. Promoting the Colonial Idea. Propaganda and Visions of Empire in France. London: PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  17. Choay, Françoise. 1992. L’allégorie du patrimoine. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  18. ——. 2009. Le patrimoine en questions. Anthologie pour un combat. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  19. Clifford, James. 1988. The Predicament of Culture. Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge (Mass.), London: Harvard University Press, 255–76. (“On Orientalism”)Google Scholar
  20. ——. 1989. “The others. Beyond the ‘salvage paradigm’.” Third Text (special issue Magiciens de la Terre) 3,6: 73–8.Google Scholar
  21. Codell, Julie, and Dianne Sachko Macleod, eds. 1998. Orientalism Transposed. The Impact of the Colonies on British culture. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  22. Cohn, Bernard S. 1996. Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge. The British in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Conklin, Alice. 1997. A Mission to Civilize: the Republican Idea of Empire in France and West-Africa, 1895–1930. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Conrad, Sebastian, and Shalini Randeira, eds. 2002. Postkoloniale Perspektiven in den Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  25. Costantini, Dino. 2008. Mission civilisatrice. Le rôle de l’histoire coloniale dans la construction de l’identité politique française. Paris: Éditions la découverte.Google Scholar
  26. Daughton, James Patrick. 2002. The Civilizing Mission: Missions, Colonialists, and the French Identity, 1885–1914. Ann Arbor: University Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  27. Deschamps, Hubert. 1963. “Et Maintenant, Lord Lugard?” Africa, Journal of the International African Institute 33,4: 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Desroches-Noblecourt, Christiane and Georg Gerster. 1968. The World saves Abu Simbel. Vienna: Koska.Google Scholar
  29. Edsel, Robert M., and Bret Witter. 2009. The Monuments Men. Allied Heroes, Nazi Thieves and the Greatest Treasure Hunt in History. London: Center Street.Google Scholar
  30. Elias, Norbert. 1976. Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. 2 vols. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  31. Fairclough, Graham et al., eds. 2008. The Heritage Reader. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Falser, Michael. 2010. “From the Venice Charter (1964) to the Nara Conference (1994)––changing concepts of authenticity?” In Theory and Practice in Conservation and Preservation––Interactions between Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the International Conference of the ICOMOS International Scientific Committee for the Theory and Philosophy of Conservation and Restoration, April 23–27 (Vienna), edited by Michael Falser, Wilfried Lipp and Andrzej Tomaszewski, 115–32. Florence: Polistampa. Online in a German version of 2011. Accessed October 14, 2014. http://www.kunstgeschichte-ejournal.net/239/
  33. ——. 2011. “Krishna and the Plaster Cast. Translating the Cambodian Temple of Angkor Wat in the French Colonial Period.” Transcultural Studies 2: 6–50. Accessed September 15, 2012. http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/ojs/index.php/transcultural/article/view/9083.
  34. ——. 2015. Angkor Wat. From Jungle Find to Global Icon. A Transcultural History of Heritage. Berlin: De Gruyter. [forthcoming]Google Scholar
  35. Falser, Michael and Monica Juneja, eds. 2013a. Kulturerbe und Denkmalpflege transkulturell. Grenzgänge zwischen Theorie und Praxis. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  36. ——. 2013b. “Archaeologising” Heritage? Transcultural Entanglements between Local Social Practices and Global Virtual Realities. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Farmer, Walter. 2000. The Safekeepers. A Memoir of the Arts at the End of World War II. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  38. Fisch, Jörg. 1992. “Zivilisation, Kultur.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, edited by Otto Brunner, vol. 7, 679–774. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
  39. Galtung, Johan. 1978. “Eine strukturelle Theorie des Imperialismus.” In Imperialismus und strukturelle Gewalt. Analysen über abhängige Reproduktion, edited by Dieter Senghaas, 29–104. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. First edition 1972.Google Scholar
  40. Girardet, Raoul. 1972. L’Idee coloniale en France 1871–1962. Paris: Editions de la Table Ronde.Google Scholar
  41. Glover, Ian C. 2006. “Some National, Regional, and Political Uses of Archaeology in East and Southeast Asia.” In The Archaeology of Asia, edited by Miriam Stark, 17–36. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gouda, Frances. 1995. Dutch Culture Overseas: Colonial Practice in the Netherlands Indies, 1900–1942. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harmand, Jules. 1910. Domination and Colonisation. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  44. Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger, eds. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hoffman, Barbara T., ed. 2006. Art and Culture Heritage. Law, Policy, and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. ICOMOS. 1964. International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Charter). Accessed March 6, 2014. http://www.international.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf.
  47. Jennings, Eric T. 2005. “Visions and Representations of French Empire.” The Journal of Modern History 77, 3: 701–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jokilehto, Jukka. 1999. A History of Architectural Conservation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  49. ——. 2013. “After Nara. The Process of Transculturation in Global Heritage Doctrines.” In Kulturerbe und Denkmalpflege transkulturell. Grenzgänge zwischen Theorie und Praxis, edited by Michael Falser and Monica Juneja, 321–40. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  50. Jomard, Edme François, ed. 1809–1828. Description de l’Égypte ou recueil des observations et des recherches qui ont été faites en Égypte pendant l’expédition de l’armée française, publié par les ordres de Sa Majesté l’Empereur Napoléon le Grand. 18 vols. Paris: L’Imprimérie Impériale.Google Scholar
  51. Juneja, Monica. 2001. “Introduction.” In Architecture in Medieval India: Forms, Contexts, Histories, edited by Monica Juneja, 1–108. New Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
  52. ——. 2012a. “Kunstgeschichte und kulturelle Differenz. Eine Einleitung.” Kritische Berichte 40,2 (themed issue Universalität der Kunstgeschichte?), edited by Matthias Bruhn, Monica Juneja, and Elke Anne Werner, 6–12.Google Scholar
  53. ——. 2012b. “Global Art History and the ‘Burden of Representation’.” In Global Studies: Mapping contemporary Art and Culture, edited by Hans Belting, Jakob Birken, and Andrea Buddensieg, 274–297. Stuttgart: Hatje Cantz.Google Scholar
  54. Juneja, Monica, and Margit Pernau. 2009. “Lost in translation? Transcending Boundaries in Comparative History.” In Comparative and Transnational History. Central European Approaches and New Perspectives, edited by Heinz-Gerhard Haupt and Jürgen Kocka, 105–29. New York, Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  55. Koselleck, Reinhard. 2004. Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press. Originally published in German as Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1979).Google Scholar
  56. Labouret, Henri. 1962. Colonisation, colonialisme, décolonisation. Paris: Larose.Google Scholar
  57. Laissus, Yves. 1998. L’Egypte, une aventure savante: Avec Bonaparte, Kleber, Menou 1798–1801. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  58. Larsen, Knut Einar, and Nils Marstein, eds. Conference on Authenticity in relation to the World Heritage Convention. Preparatory Workshop, Bergen/Norway, January 31–February 2, 1994. Trondheim: Riksantikvaren.Google Scholar
  59. Larsen, Knut Einar, ed. 1995. Nara Conference on Authenticity in relation to the World Heritage Convention. Nara/Japan November 1–6, 1994. Trondheim: Tapir Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. Laurens, Henry et al. 1989. L’Expédition d’Égypte. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  61. Leniaud, Jean-Michel. 2002. Les archipels du passé. Le patrimoine et son histoire. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  62. Locher-Scholten, Elsbeth. 1981. Ethics in Fragments. Five Studies about Colonial Thinking and Practices of Dutchmen in the Indonesian Archipelago 1877–1942. Utrecht: HES Publishers. Original in Dutch.Google Scholar
  63. Lorin, Amaury. 2008. “La ‘découverte’ française du site: autour de Paul Doumer et de la fondation de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient.” In Angkor VIIIe-XXIe siècle: mémoire et identité khmères, edited by Hugues Tertrais, 110–23. Paris: Édition Autrement.Google Scholar
  64. Lowenthal, David. 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. ——. 1996. Possessed by the Past: The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  66. Macfie, Alexander Lyon, ed. 2000. Orientalism. A Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Mann, Michael. 2004. “‘Torchbearers upon the Path of Progress’: Britain’s Ideology of a ‘Moral and Material Progress’ in India. An Introductory Essay.” In Colonialism as Civilising Mission. Cultural Ideology in British India, edited by Harald Fischer-Tiné and Michael Mann, 1–26. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  68. Ministère du commerce, de l’industrie et des colonies, Exposition universelle international de 1889, Direction générale de l’exploitation. 1889a. Congrès international pour la protection des oeuvres d’art et des monuments, tenu à Paris du 24 au 29 juin 1889: procès verbaux sommaires, rédigés par le secretraire général Charles Normand. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
  69. ——. 1889b. Congrès international colonial, tenu à Paris du 30 juillet au 3 août 1889: procès verbaux sommaires. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
  70. Mitchell, Timothy. 1989. “The World as Exhibition.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31: 217–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Morton, Patricia L. 2000. Hybrid Modernities. Architecture and Presentation at the 1931 Colonial Exposition, Paris. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  72. Nafziger, James A., and Tullio Scovazzi, eds. 2008. Le patrimoine de l’humanité. The Cultural Heritage of Mankind. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  73. Office international des musées. 1939. La protection des monuments et des oeuvres d’art en temps de guerre. Manuel technique et juridique. Paris: Publications de l’Institut Internationale de Coopération Intellectuelle.Google Scholar
  74. Osterhammel, Jürgen. 2005. “‘The Great Work of Uplifting Manking.’ Zivilisierungsmission und Moderne.” In Zivilisierungsmissionen. Imperiale Weltverbesserung seit dem 18. Jahrhundert, edited by Boris Barth and Jürgen Osterhammel, 363–427. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  75. ——. 2006. Europe, the ‘West’ and the Civilizing Mission. London: German Historical Institute London.Google Scholar
  76. ——. 2012. Kolonialismus: Geschichte, Formen, Folgen. München: Beck.Google Scholar
  77. Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2005. “Empire & ‘Civilizing’ Missions, Past & Present.” Daedalus (theme issue On Imperialism) 134,2: 34–45.Google Scholar
  78. Poulot, Dominique. 1997. Musée, nation, patrimoine 1789–1815. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  79. Pottier, Christophe. 2000. “The Contribution of the École Française d’Extrême-Orient with Respect to the Cultural Heritage of Angkor During the Past 100 Years.” Journal of Sophia Asian Studies 18: 253–62.Google Scholar
  80. Pratt, Mary Louise. 1992. Imperial Eyes. Travel Writing and Transculturation. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Pyenson, Lewis. 1993. Civilising Mission. Exact Sciences and French Overseas Expansion, 1830–1940. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Report of the American Commission for the Protection and Salvage of Artistic and Historic Monuments in War Areas. Washington DC, 1946.Google Scholar
  83. Rorimer, James. 1950. Survival. The Salvage and Protection of Art in War. New York: Abelard Press.Google Scholar
  84. Said, Edward. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin. First published in 1978.Google Scholar
  85. ——. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  86. Schäbler, Birgit. 2003. “Globale Moderne und die Geburt der Zivilisationsmission an der französischen Binnengrenze: Die mission civilisatrice ottomane.” Periplus (themed issue Westasien und die Moderne): 9–29.Google Scholar
  87. Schröder, Wolfgang M. 2005. “Mission impossible? Begriff, Modelle und Begründungen der ‘civilising mission’ aus philosophischer Sicht.” In Zivilisierungsmissionen. Imperiale Weltverbesserung seit dem 18. Jahrhundert, edited by Boris Barth and Jürgen Osterhammel, 13–32. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  88. Sengupta, Indra. 2013. “A Conservation Code for the Colony: John Marshall’s Conservation Manual and Monument Preservation Between India and Europe.” In Archaeologising’“Archaeologising” Heritage? Transcultural Entanglements between Local Social Practices and Global Virtual Realities, edited by Michael Falser and Monica Juneja, 21–37. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.Google Scholar
  89. Singaravélou, Pierre. 1999. L’École française d’Extrême-Orient, ou l’institution des marges, 1898–1956: essai d’histoire sociale et politique de la science coloniale. Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar
  90. Skilton, John Jr. 1948. Défense de l’art européen. Souvenirs d’un officier américain “Specialite des Monuments.” Paris: Les èditions internationales.Google Scholar
  91. Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. “Does the Subaltern speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stubbs, John H., and Emily G. Makas. 2011. Architectural Conservation in Europe and the Americas. National Experiences and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  94. Swenson, Astrid, and Peter Mandler eds. 2013. From Plunder to Preservation: Britain and the Heritage of Empire, c. 1800–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Turner, Bryan S. 1994. Orientalism, Postmodernism and Globalism. London: Routledge, 100–4. (“From Orientalism to Global Sociology”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. UNESCO. 1972. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Accessed March 6, 2014. http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/.
  97. ——. 1977–2013. The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Accessed March 6, 2014. http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/.
  98. Waterton, Emma, and Steve Watson, eds. 2010. Culture, Heritage and Representation. Perspectives on Visuality and the Past. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  99. Watt, Carey A. 2011. “Introduction: The Relevance and Complexity of Civilizing Missions c. 1800–2010.” In Civilising Mission in Colonial and Postcolonial South Asia. From Improvement to Development, edited by Carey A. Watt and Michael Mann, 1–34. London, New York, New Delhi: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  100. Werner, Michael, and Bénédicte Zimmermann. 2004. De la comparaison à l’histoire croisée. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  101. White, Owen, and James P. Daughton, eds. 2012. French Missionaries and the Modern World. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cluster of Excellence ‘Asia and Europe in a Global Context’Heidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations