Abstract
In real life, it is difficult to hold some assumptions of the classic game theory. For example, when a player of a game chooses a strategy, it should consider not only payoff from taking the strategy and others’ best responses, but also its goal and belief about others, which are normally private in real life. However, in game theory they are assumed “common knowledge” among players. To address the problem, this paper proposes a game model that allows the private goals and beliefs of players, which are represented in propositional formulae in order to specify reasoning procedures that the players choose their strategies in a game. Moreover, we reveal how players’ private goals and beliefs influence the outcomes of their game. Finally, we examplify how our model can be used to effectively explain an interesting game.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Nash, J.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36(1), 48–49 (1950)
Bénabou, R., Tirole, J.: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Review of Economic Studies 70(3), 489–520 (2003)
Ågotnes, T., Harrenstein, P., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Verifiable equilibria in Boolean games. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 689–695 (2013)
Bonzon, E., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Lang, J.: Effectivity functions and efficient coalitions in Boolean games. Synthese 187, 73–103 (2012)
Mihaylov, M.: Decentralised Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems, PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels (2012)
Wooldridge, M., Endriss, U., Kraus, S., Lang, J.: Incentive engineering for Boolean games. Artificial Intelligence 195, 418–439 (2013)
Eichberger, J., Kelsey, D., Schipper, B.C.: Ambiguity and social interaction. Oxford Economic Papers 62(2), 355–379 (2008)
Zhang, Y., Luo, X., Ma, W.: Security games with ambiguous information about attacker types. In: Cranefield, S., Nayak, A. (eds.) AI 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8272, pp. 14–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Cui, J., Luo, X., Sim, K.M.: A New Epistemic logic Model of Regret Games. In: Wang, M. (ed.) KSEM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8041, pp. 372–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Van Benthem, J.: Rational dynamics and epistemic logic in games. International Game Theory Review 9(1), 13–45 (2007)
Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowlegde Engineer Review 10(2), 115–152 (1995)
Savage, L.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)
Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–669 (1961)
Batson, C.D.: Altruism in humans. Oxford University Press (2011)
Huang, F., Luo, X., Leung, H.-F., Zhong, Q.: Games played by network players. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 1–8 (2013)
Harrenstein, P., van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.-J.C., Witteveen, C.: Boolean games. In: Proceeding of the 8th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, pp. 287–298 (2001)
Marco, G.D., Romaniello, M.: Beliefs correspondence and equilibria in ambiguous games. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (2010)
Bonzon, E., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Lang, J.: Dependencies between players in Boolean games. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 50(6), 899–914 (2009)
Daskalakis, C., Goldberg, P., Papadimitriou, C.: The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium. SIAM Journal on Computing 39(1), 195–259 (2009)
Schmeidler, D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3), 57–187 (1989)
Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18, 141–153 (1989)
Choquet, G.: Theory of capacities. Annales de l’institut Fourier 5, 131–295 (1953)
Elster, J.: Emotions and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature 36(1), 47–74 (1998)
Klibanoff, P.: Characterizing Uncertainty Aversion through Preference for Mixtures. Social Choice and Welfare 18(2), 289–301 (2001)
Zhang, Y., Luo, X., Leung, H.-F.: Fuzzily Constrained Games. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 361–368 (2013)
McCain. R. A., A Non-technical Introduction to the Analysis of strategy. Tomson South-Western (2004)
Milovsky, Nicholas: The Basics of Game Theory and Associated Games (retrieved February 11, 2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wu, G., Luo, X., Zhong, Q. (2014). A Game Model with Private Goal and Belief. In: Pham, DN., Park, SB. (eds) PRICAI 2014: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8862. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13560-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13560-1_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13559-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13560-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)