Skip to main content

A Game Model with Private Goal and Belief

  • Conference paper
Book cover PRICAI 2014: Trends in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8862))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In real life, it is difficult to hold some assumptions of the classic game theory. For example, when a player of a game chooses a strategy, it should consider not only payoff from taking the strategy and others’ best responses, but also its goal and belief about others, which are normally private in real life. However, in game theory they are assumed “common knowledge” among players. To address the problem, this paper proposes a game model that allows the private goals and beliefs of players, which are represented in propositional formulae in order to specify reasoning procedures that the players choose their strategies in a game. Moreover, we reveal how players’ private goals and beliefs influence the outcomes of their game. Finally, we examplify how our model can be used to effectively explain an interesting game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nash, J.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36(1), 48–49 (1950)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bénabou, R., Tirole, J.: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Review of Economic Studies 70(3), 489–520 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ågotnes, T., Harrenstein, P., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Verifiable equilibria in Boolean games. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 689–695 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonzon, E., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Lang, J.: Effectivity functions and efficient coalitions in Boolean games. Synthese 187, 73–103 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Mihaylov, M.: Decentralised Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems, PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wooldridge, M., Endriss, U., Kraus, S., Lang, J.: Incentive engineering for Boolean games. Artificial Intelligence 195, 418–439 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Eichberger, J., Kelsey, D., Schipper, B.C.: Ambiguity and social interaction. Oxford Economic Papers 62(2), 355–379 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, Y., Luo, X., Ma, W.: Security games with ambiguous information about attacker types. In: Cranefield, S., Nayak, A. (eds.) AI 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8272, pp. 14–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Cui, J., Luo, X., Sim, K.M.: A New Epistemic logic Model of Regret Games. In: Wang, M. (ed.) KSEM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8041, pp. 372–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Benthem, J.: Rational dynamics and epistemic logic in games. International Game Theory Review 9(1), 13–45 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowlegde Engineer Review 10(2), 115–152 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Savage, L.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–669 (1961)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Batson, C.D.: Altruism in humans. Oxford University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, F., Luo, X., Leung, H.-F., Zhong, Q.: Games played by network players. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 1–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harrenstein, P., van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.-J.C., Witteveen, C.: Boolean games. In: Proceeding of the 8th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, pp. 287–298 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marco, G.D., Romaniello, M.: Beliefs correspondence and equilibria in ambiguous games. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bonzon, E., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Lang, J.: Dependencies between players in Boolean games. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 50(6), 899–914 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Daskalakis, C., Goldberg, P., Papadimitriou, C.: The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium. SIAM Journal on Computing 39(1), 195–259 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmeidler, D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3), 57–187 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18, 141–153 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Choquet, G.: Theory of capacities. Annales de l’institut Fourier 5, 131–295 (1953)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Elster, J.: Emotions and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature 36(1), 47–74 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Klibanoff, P.: Characterizing Uncertainty Aversion through Preference for Mixtures. Social Choice and Welfare 18(2), 289–301 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, Y., Luo, X., Leung, H.-F.: Fuzzily Constrained Games. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 361–368 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. McCain. R. A., A Non-technical Introduction to the Analysis of strategy. Tomson South-Western (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Milovsky, Nicholas: The Basics of Game Theory and Associated Games (retrieved February 11, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, G., Luo, X., Zhong, Q. (2014). A Game Model with Private Goal and Belief. In: Pham, DN., Park, SB. (eds) PRICAI 2014: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8862. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13560-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13560-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13559-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13560-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics