Abstract
This thesis represents one of the possible ways of utilizing the concept of evaluating ecosystem services. It is about connecting this concept with landscape research from the perspective of physical geography. The CICES—Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services methodology from January 2013—has been used for this purpose. It is one of the most advanced methodological systems of evaluation in this field. The modification that the collective of authors has prepared expands this methodology into new areas. The modified methodology allows the expansion of the perception of the influence of the ecosystem’s services on the human population. Unitary humanity has been substituted by individual groups of people who live in the countryside. Another modification is the option of utilizing this methodology when evaluating the impact of planned constructions on the ecosystem services in the construction’s area. It also brings a geographical way of observing the landscape into the method of evaluating ecosystem services—spatiality. Thanks to the thus created method of research it was possible to research the cultural landscape in so far unresearched context, connections and details. The individual results are shown with the help of a table chart method of research which manages to capture information in the needed context. The land cadastre from the municipality of Hluboké in the basin of the river Svratky (Czech Republic), where the author’s research has been conducted, is used as an example for the presentation of this method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carpenter SR, Chisholm SW, Krebs CJ et al (1995) Ecosystem experiments. Science 269:324–327
Carson R, Darling L (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, p 368
Cloke P, Crang P, Goodwin M (2005) Introducing human geographies. Hodder Arnold, London, p 653
Crossman ND, Burkhard B, Nedkov S et al (2013) A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 4:4–14. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001
Daily G (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 392
Ehrlich PR (1968) The population bomb. Ballantine Books, New York, p 223
Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH, Holdren JP (1977) Ecoscience: population, resources, environment. Freeman WH, San Francisco, p 1050
Ehrlich PR, Moony HA (1983) Extinction, substitution, and the ecosystem services. Bioscience 33:248–254
Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2013) CICES V4.3—revised report prepared following consultation on CICES Version 4, August–December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003, p. 34. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seearev/GCComments/CICES_Report.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2014
Harvey D (2006) Space as a keyword. In: Gregory D (ed) Castree N, pp 270–293
Hynek A (2009) Prostorovosti: místa, krajiny, regiony. Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae vol 53, Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, pp 123–132
Hynek A (2010) Krajina: objekt, nebo konstrukt? In: Herber V (ed) Fyzickogeografický sborník 8, Fyzická geografie a kulturní krajina, MU, Brno, pp 138–142
Hynek A (2011) Environmentální fyzická geografie: verze trvalé udržitelnosti. Fyzickogeografický sborník 9, Fyzická geografie a životní prostředí. Příspěvky z 28. výroční konference Fyzickogeografické sekce České geografické společnosti konané 8. A 9. Února 2011 v Brně, Herber V (ed), MU, Brno, pp 17–22
Hynek A, Vávra J (2007) (Přinejmenším) čtyři prostorovosti krajiny. In: Fyzickogeografický sborník 5 z 24. výroční konference fyzickogeografické sekce České geografické společnosti 13. a 14. února 2007 v Brně. Fyzická geografie-výzkum, vzdělávání, aplikace, Herber V (ed), MU, Brno, pp 7–14
Leopold A (1949) A sand country almanac and sketches from here and there. Oxford University Press, New York, p 256
Marsh GP 1864 (1965) Man and nature or, physical geography modified by human action: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press (1885 Cambrige. The earth as modified by human action: a last revision of man of nature. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York)
Martínez-Harms MJ, Balvadera P (2012) Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 8(1–2):17–25. doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
MEA (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment (Millennium ecosystem assessment), 2nd edn. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 212
Sears PB (1955) The processes of environmental change by man. In: Thomas WL (ed) Man’s role is changing the face of the earth, vol 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB, p 40. http://doc.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/StudyandReports/Reports/Synthesisreport/TEEBSynthesisReport2010.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2014
Vitousek PM, Hooper DU (1993) Biological diversity and terrestrial ecosystem biochemistry. In: Schulze ED, Moony HA (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin
Westman WE (1977) How much are nature’s services word? Science 197:960–964
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Milan, S., Alois, H. (2015). The Landscape Research in the Svratka-River Basin Using Ecosystem Services According to the CICES Methodology. In: Luc, M., Somorowska, U., Szmańda, J. (eds) Landscape Analysis and Planning. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13527-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13527-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13526-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13527-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)