Challenges of Cloud Business Process Management

  • Iryna BochonEmail author
  • Volker Ivens
  • Ralf Nagel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Logistics book series (LNLO)


Cloud Business Process Management means more than outsourcing of the Process Editor and the Execution Engine. The overall Process lifecycle has to be adopted to face the challenges of Cloud Computing. In this chapter we discuss these challenges and present our solutions to reconcile cost efficiency, security, availability, agility and low administration overhead.


Business process management Cloud computing Logistics mall Logistics process designer 


  1. 1.
    Mell, P., Grance, T.: The NIST definition of cloud computing, working paper national institute of standards and technology (2009).
  2. 2.
    BSA: 2013 BSA Global Cloud COMPUTING Scorecard (2013). Accessed 29 April 2013
  3. 3.
    OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0 (2011). Accessed 29 April 2013
  4. 4.
    Harmuth, N.: Business Process Model and Notation 2.0—Evaluierung der Spezifikation und Ableitung einer formalen Semantik an ausgewählten Sprachelementen auf Basis von Petri-Netzen (2010), Diplomarbeit an der Fakultät für Informatik der TU Dortmund (reference in German)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web Services Architecture. Accessed 29 April 2013
  6. 6.
    Lawler J.P., Howell-Barber H.: Service-Oriented Architecture: SOA Strategy, Methodology, and Technology. Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holtkamp, B.: The logistics mall—an it-architecture for logistisc-as-a-product. In: ten Hompel, M., Rehof, J., Wolf, O. (eds.) Cloud Computing for Logistics, Lecture Notes in Logistics, Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gsell, H., Nagel R.: Application integration in the logistics mall. Paper presented at the SDPS 2012—17th international conference on transformative science, engineering, and business In-novation. Berlin, Germany (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chappell, D.: Enterprise Service Bus: Theory in Practice, O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Böhmer, M., Schmidt, M., Weißenberg, N.: Seamless interoperability in logistics: narrowing the business-it gap by logistics business objects. In: ten Hompel, M., Rehof, J., Wolf, O. (eds.) Cloud Computing for Logistics, Lecture Notes in Logistics, Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wnek, J.: LSI-based taxonomy generation: the taxonomist system. In: Kantor, P. et al. (eds.) ISI 2005, LNCS, vol. 3495, pp. 389–394. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Activiti BPM Platform Homepage.
  13. 13.
    Eggemann, J., Leveling, J., Weiß, N.: Business apps meet the challenge of covering continually changing logistics requirements. In: ten Hompel, M., Rehof, J., Wolf, O. (eds.) Cloud Computing for Logistics, Lecture Notes in Logistics, Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Google Developers: Google Web Toolkit. Accessed 29 April 2013
  15. 15.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): HTML5 Candidate Recommendation. Accessed 29 April 2013
  16. 16.
    yWorks: yFILES for HTML. Accessed 29 April 2013
  17. 17.
    Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie: Exponat „IKT-Innovationen in der Logistik—Wachstumsmotor für Unternehmen“, Nationaler IT Gipfel 2012, Retrieved from,property=pdf,bereich=itgipfel,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf (reference in German)
  18. 18.
    Nationaler IT Gipfel Homepage.
  19. 19.
    Mevius, M., Wiedmann, P.: BPM @Cloud-Lab—Open Innovation Platform zur Entwicklung und Evaluation eines agilen Geschäftsprozessmanagements. In: HTWG Forum. Das Forschungsmagazin der Hochschule Konstanz, pp. 60–66. HTWG Konstanz (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mevius, M., Stephan, R., Wiedmann, P.: Innovative approach for agile bPM. In: The Fifth International Conference on Information, Process, and Knowledge Management eKNOW, pp. 160–165. IARIA (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sinur, J., Hill, J.B.: Magic quadrant for business process management suites. In: Gartner RAS Core Research Note G00205212, pp. 1–24. RA2 10182011 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Intalio|Create Homepage. Accessed 29 April 2013
  24. 24.
    IYOPRO Homepage. Accessed 29 April 2013
  25. 25.
    Appian BPM Software Homepage. Accessed 29 April 2013
  26. 26.
    Cordys Business Operations Platform Homepage. Accessed 29 April 2013
  27. 27.
    Fleming M., Silverstein J.: IDC market scape: worldwide business process platforms 2011 vendor analysis. In: BuyerPulse Analysis: Business Process Management Software, Competitive Analysis, IDC #228598, vol. 1 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Interstage BOP Homepage, Accessed 29 April 2013
  29. 29.
    Craggs, S.: Comparing BPM from Pegasystems, IBM and TIBCO. Taking a high-level look at BPM solutions from three leading vendors. In: Whitepaper, 1.00 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    TIBCO Software Homepage. Accessed 29 April 2013
  31. 31.
    Rücker, B.: Open Source BPM. Ein Überblick über aktuelle Tools und Strömungen. In: Javamagazin, DevOps, pp. 86–95 (2012) (reference in German)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Preusker, N., Rücker, B.: Activiti 5. Open source BPM on the next level. In: Javamagazin, Social Media API, pp. 106–110 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Clavii BMP Cloud Homepage. Accessed 29 April 2013
  34. 34.
    ProView (Personalized and Updatable Process Visualizations) Homepage. Accessed 29 April 2013
  35. 35.
    Bingmann, A.: Ulmer Informatiker auf der CeBIT 2013: Neue Anwendung garantiert Durchblick bei komplexen Geschäftsprozessen. News. (reference in German)
  36. 36.
    BPM@Cloud Forschungsprojekt Homepage. Accessed 29 April 2013
  37. 37.
    Xpert.ivy Homepage. Accessed 29 April 2013
  38. 38.
    Collaboration in der Cloud 3.0—Business Process Management und Social Media. In: Midrange Magazin, ITP Verlag GmbH, online version: (2013). Accessed 29 April 2013
  39. 39.
    Bauer, T., Dadam, P.: lfficient distributed workflow management based on variable server assignments. In: Wangler, B., Bergman, L. (eds.): CAiSE 2000, LNCS vol. 1789, pp. 94–109. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering ISSTDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations