Seamless Interoperability in Logistics: Narrowing the Business-IT Gap by Logistics Business Objects

  • Martin Böhmer
  • Michael Schmidt
  • Norbert Weißenberg
Part of the Lecture Notes in Logistics book series (LNLO)


Logistics IT is shifting from large, monolithic software systems to smaller, modular applications (“apps”) that can be flexibly composed to support individual business processes. In order to anticipate extensive integration projects, seamless interoperability is a crucial requirement. This paper outlines a standards-based logistics Business Object model that narrows the business-IT gap and simplifies logistics IT services regarding development and integration.


Logistics Mall Business Objects model OAGIS Business-IT gap Process modelling 


  1. 1.
    Fraunhofer Gesellschaft: Business objects for logistics. (2013)
  2. 2.
    EffizienzCluster LogistikRuhr.
  3. 3.
    Fraunhofer Gesellschaft: Logistics Mall. (2013)
  4. 4.
    Holtkamp, B., Steinbuss, S., Gsell, H., Loeffeler, T., Springer, U.: Towards a logistics cloud. In: 2010 Sixth International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids. (2010)
  5. 5.
    Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie: Exponat „IKT-Innovationen in der Logistik – Wachstumsmotor für Unternehmen“, Nationaler IT Gipfel.,property=pdf,bereich=itgipfel,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf (2012) (in German)
  6. 6.
    Nationaler IT Gipfel.
  7. 7.
    Hinssen, P. (ed.): Information is the new oil—drilling new sources of innovation, across technology.
  8. 8.
    Nettsträter, A., Geißen, T., Witthaut, M., Ebel, D., Schoneboom, J.: Logistics Software Systems and Functions: An Overview of ERP, WMS, TMS and SCM Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stiehl, V.: Composite application systems—systematisches konstruieren von verbundanwendungen unter verwendung von BPMN, dissertation, TU darmstadt. (2011) (in German)
  10. 10.
    DIN German Institute for Standardization e.V.: Economic benefits of standardization—Summary of results—Final report and practical examples, Beuth Verlag. (2000)
  11. 11.
    Berlecon research: E-business standards in Germany—current state, problems, prospects. (2010)
  12. 12.
    Böhmer, M., Daniluk, D., Schmidt, M., Gsell, H.: Business object model for realization of individual business processes in the logistics domain. In: Clausen, U., ten Hompel, M., Klumpp, M. (eds.) Efficiency and Logistics, pp. 237–244. Springer, Berlin (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    UN/CEFACT: Core components technical specification, version 3.0. (2009)
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Open Applications Group, Inc.: OAGIS release 9.5.1. (2012)
  16. 16.
    Schmidt, M., Tilp, M., Böhmer, M.: Fachliche dokumentation der geschäftsobjekte für die logistik, release 1.2.2 “blaze”, technical report, fraunhofer gesellschaft (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scott-Sabic, V.: Dictionary of Logistics. Deutsch-Englisch/Englisch-Deutsch. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heidenblut, V., ten Hompel, M.: Taschenlexikon Logistik. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). (in German)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    UN/CEFACT: Introducing UN/EDIFACT.
  21. 21.
    Open Applications Group, Inc.: Business object document (BOD) message architecture for OAGIS© release 9. + , OAGi white paper, version 1.0. (2011)
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Fraunhofer IAO: openTRANS.
  24. 24.
    Open Applications Group, Inc.: User’s guide for extending OAGIS 8, OAGi reference guide, version 1.0. (2003)
  25. 25.
    Open Applications Group, Inc.: Extending OAGIS 9.x through overlays—OAGi cheat sheet. (2009)
  26. 26.
    Open Applications Group, Inc.: OAGi development methodology, OAGi white paper. (2013)
  27. 27.
    Open Applications Group, Inc.: OAGIS—A “Canonical” business language providing both vertical and horizontal requirements, OAGI white paper, version 1.0. (2002)
  28. 28.
    Bochon, I., Ivens, V., Nagel, R.: Challenges of Cloud Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Object Management Group, Inc.: Business process model and notation (BPMN), version 2.0. (2011)
  30. 30.
    Steinbuß, S., Weißenberg, N.: Service design and process design for the logistics mall cloud. In: Yang, X., Lu, L. (eds.): Principles, Methodologies, and Service-Oriented Approaches for Cloud Computing. pp. 185−205, IGI Global, Hershey (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carr, N.G.: IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003)
  32. 32.
    Date, C.J.: An Introduction to Database Systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Englewood Cliffs (1977)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eggemann, J., Leveling, J., Weiß, N.: Business Apps Meet the Challenge of Covering Continually Changing Logistics Requirements. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    OASIS: ebXML.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
    OASIS: Universal business language TC.
  37. 37.
    Liegl, P., Zapletal, M., Pichler, C., Strommer, M.: State-of-the-art in business document standards, industrial informatics, pp.234−241. (2010)
  38. 38.
    Kabak, Y., Dogac, A.: A survey and analysis of electronic business document standards. ACM Comput. Surv. 42(3), 1−31 (2010). (2010)
  39. 39.
    Melleri, I., Hiekkanen, K. ,Mykkanen, J.: comparing information models in XML-based e-business standards—a quantitative analysis. In: IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp.225−234 (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lampathaki, F., Mouzakitis, S., Gionis, G., Charalabidis, Y., Askounis, D.: Business to business interoperability: a current review of XML data integration standards. Comput. Stan. Interfaces 31, 1045–1055 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li, H.: XML and industrial standards for electronic commerce. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2(4), 487−497 (2000)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
    Bartels, A., Moore, C.: Smart process applications fill a big business gap, forrester report (2012)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bartels, A., Moore, C.: Smart Process Applications, Forrester Wave (2013)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bauer, T., Buchwald, S., Reichert, M.: Improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of process-oriented, service-driven applications: techniques for enriching business process models. In: Service-Driven Approaches to Architecture and Enterprise Integration, pp.104−134. (2013)
  49. 49.
    Buchwald, S., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Bridging the gap between business process models and service composition specifications. In: Lee, J., et al. (eds.) Service Life Cycle Tools and Technologies: Methods, Trends, and Advances, pp. 124−153. IGI Global, Hershey. (2012)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Böhmer
    • 1
  • Michael Schmidt
    • 1
  • Norbert Weißenberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics IMLDortmundGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering ISSTDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations