Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What do Scientists and Engineers Do All Day? On the Structure of Scientific Normalcy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 311))

Abstract

Most of the debate following from Structure of Scientific Revolutions has focused on revolutionary science and paradigm shift. However, both in Kuhn and his successors in science studies, arguments about revolutionary science are built on a foundation of mostly hard-to-contest observations regarding normal science. I survey some of the ways different traditions in science studies have provided fine-grained portraits of wild-type Kuhnian normal science and summarize some recent findings from historians and sociologists regarding normal science. A textured approach to normal science is important because normal science proceeds, despite the cogent objections that can be raised against a given paradigm, in part because scientists and engineers are able to make normal science workable, on a quotidian basis, with respect to some ever-shifting set of aims promulgated relative to their professional communities and/or to various constituencies in the societies of which they are a part. That is, normal science keeps going, despite obvious anomalies and ignoration of open questions, because normal science achieves many more goals than just the clearing away of anomalies and open questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thomas Nickles also stresses the similarity between normal and revolutionary science. See Nickles (2002).

  2. 2.

    For an alternative reading of Kuhn’s intentions, see Bird, Chap. 3, this volume

References

  • Ashmore, M., M. Mulkay, and T. Pinch 1989. Health and efficiency: A sociology of health economics. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardini, T. 2000. Bootstrapping: Douglas Engelbart, coevolution, and the origins of personal computing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. 1992. What’s in a patent?. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, eds. W. Bijker and J. Law, 53–75. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. 1985. Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. 1990. Artificial experts: Social knowledge and intelligent machines. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins H. M. 2010. Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M., and T. J. Pinch 1982. Frames of meaning: The social construction of extraordinary science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M., and R. Evans 2002. The Third Wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience, Social Studies of Science 32:235–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L., and P. Galison 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doing, P. 2009. Velvet revolution at the synchrotron: Biology, physics, and change in science. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. 1972. What computers can’t do: The limits of artificial intelligence. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. 1992. What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge, D. O., and M. J. Mulkay 1976. Astronomy transformed: The emergence of radio astronomy in Britain. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, D. 2007. The shock of the old: Technology and global history since 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, M. 2007. Barry Commoner and the science of survival: The remaking of American environmentalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, L. [1935] 1979. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. trans. F. Bradley and T. J. Trenn, ed. T. J. Trenn and R. K. Merton. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P. 1997. Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., M. Lynch, and E. Livingston 1981. The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11:131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusterson, H. 1996. Nuclear rites: A weapons laboratory at the end of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, S. 2009. Alien ocean: Anthropological voyages in microbial seas. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, F. L. 1990. Laboratory notebooks: Can the daily record illuminate the broader picture, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 134:349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., ed. 2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, D. 2005a. Drawing theories apart: The dispersion of Feynman diagrams in postwar physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, D., ed. 2005b. Pedagogy and the practice of science: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, D. 2011. How the hippies saved physics: Science, counterculture, and the quantum revival. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelty, C. 1997. The Whitehead Institute: A video portrait. Paper presented at the Society for Literature and Science meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, 30 October—2 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, D. 2011. Lab coats in Hollywood: Science, scientists, and cinema. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koertge, N., ed. 1998. A house built on sand: Exposing postmodernist myths about science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E. 1994. Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E. 2002. Landscapes and labscapes: Exploring the lab-field border in biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labinger, J., and H. M. Collins, eds. 2001. The one culture? A conversation about science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1999. Circulating reference: Sampling the soil in the Amazon rain forest. In Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies, 24–79. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., and S. Woolgar 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, C., and S. Shapin eds. 1998. Science incarnate: Historical embodiments of natural knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lécuyer, C. 2006. Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the growth of high tech, 1930–1970. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezaun, J. 2006. Creating a new object of government: Making genetically modified organisms traceable, Social Studies of Science 36:499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lezaun, J. 2012. The pragmatic sanction of materials: Notes for an ethnography of legal substances, Journal of Law and Society 39:20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. 1985. Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M., and S. Woolgar 1990. Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., S. A. Cole, R. McNally, and K. Jordan 2008. Truth machine: The contentious history of DNA fingerprinting. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, D. 1990. Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. 2011. Science-mart: Privatizing American science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitman, G. 1999. Reel nature: America’s romance with wildlife on films. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mody, C. C. M. 2010. Fact and friction, Metascience 19:493–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mody, C. C. M. 2011. Instrumental community: Probe microscopy and the path to nanotechnology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mody, C. C. M. 2012. Conferences and the emergence of nanoscience. In The social life of nanotechnology, ed. B.H. Harthorn and J. Mohr, 52–65. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mody, C. C. M., and D. Kaiser 2008. Scientific training and the creation of scientific knowledge. In Handbook of science and technology studies, ed. E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 377–402. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. 2008. Disrupting science: social movements, American scientists, and the politics of the military, 1945–1975. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. 1985. The social construction of two biologists’ proposals, Written Communication 2:219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T. 2002. Normal science: From logic to case-based and model-based reasoning. In Thomas Kuhn, ed. T. Nickles, 142–177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E., and S. Jacoby 1997. Down to the wire: The cultural clock of physicists and the discourse of consensus, Language in Society 26:479–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. 1996. Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A., ed. 1992. Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. 1995. The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. 2010. The cybernetic brain: Sketches of another future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. J. 1986. Confronting nature: The sociology of solar-neutrino detection. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. 1996. Making PCR: A story of biotechnology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P., and T. Dan-Cohen 2005. Machine to make a future: Biotech chronicles. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, A., and P. Shiman 2002. Strategic computing: DARPA and the quest for machine intelligence, 1983–1993. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, A. 1994. Science in the pub: Artisan botanists in early nineteenth-century Lancashire, History of Science 32:269–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin S. 1975. Phrenological knowledge and the social structure of early nineteenth-century Edinburgh, Annals of Science 32:219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. 2008. The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin S., and S. Schaffer 1985. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, K. 2007. Biotech in court: A legal lesson in the unity of science, Social Studies of Science 37:357–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traweek, S. 1988. Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. 2008. In Sputnik’s shadow: The President’s Science Advisory Committee and Cold War America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisnioski, M. 2003. Inside ‘the System’: Engineers, scientists and the boundaries of social protest in the long 1960s, History and Technology 19:313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

    Cyrus C. M. Mody

Authors
  1. Cyrus C. M. Mody
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyrus C. M. Mody .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA

    William J. Devlin

  2. Department of Philosophy, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Alisa Bokulich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mody, C. (2015). What do Scientists and Engineers Do All Day? On the Structure of Scientific Normalcy. In: Devlin, W., Bokulich, A. (eds) Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 311. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13383-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation