Well Intake Systems for SWRO Systems: Design and Limitations

  • Robert G. MalivaEmail author
  • Thomas M. Missimer
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


Well intake systems are used globally for intakes to hundreds of medium to low capacity seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) systems. Conventional vertical wells are the most commonly used type. Other types of well intake systems include slant wells, horizontal wells, and radial collector wells (Ranney wells). Selection of the well design type that best meets the feed water capacity requirement at a given site is based on the local hydrogeology, shoreline conditions, potential interference with other water users, and the capacity of the SWRO treatment plant. Selection of any type of well system or other subsurface intake requires that the operational risk for future performance must be carefully evaluated. Conventional vertical wells have exhibited long-term successful operation and therefore, have a low risk profile. Radial collector wells have been successfully operating for decades at locations where the hydrogeologic conditions are suitable for their use. Slant and horizontal wells are relatively new innovations as applied to use for SWRO intakes and few large-scale facilities are operating. These well types have a higher risk in terms of long term operation.


Duplex Stainless Steel Intake System Coastal Aquifer Horizontal Well Drilling Fluid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bartak, R., Grischek, T., Ghodeif, K., & Ray, C. (2012). Beach sand filtration as pre-treatment for RO desalination. International Journal of Water Sciences, 1(2), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. David, B., Pinot, J., & Morillon, M. (2009). Beach wells for large-scale reverse osmosis plant: The Sur case study. Proceedings of the International Desalination Association World Congress on Desalination and Water Reuse. Dubai, UAE, DB09-16, 10 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Dehwah, A. H., Al-Mashharawi, S., Kammourie, N., & Missimer, T. M. (2014). Impact of well intake systems on bacterial, algae, and organic carbon reduction in SWRO desalination systems, SAWACO, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Desalination and Water Treatment, (ahead-of-print), 1-7 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Driscoll, F. G. (1986). Groundwater and wells (2nd edn.). St. Paul, Minnesota: Johnson Filtration Systems, 1089 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Industries, Foremost. (2003). Benefits of dual rotary drilling in unstable overburden formations. Calgary, Canada: Foremost Industries. 19 p.Google Scholar
  6. Herrick, D. (1994). Dual-rotary drilling—is it for you. Water Well Journal, 48, 50–54.Google Scholar
  7. Henahan, M. (1999) Dual rotary drilling in unconsolidated overburden. Water Well Journal, 53, 66–68.Google Scholar
  8. Mackey, E. D., Pozos, N., James, W., Seacord, T., Hunt, H., & Mayer, D. L. (2011). Assessing seawater intake systems for desalination plants. Denver, CO: Water Research Foundation. 172 p.Google Scholar
  9. Missimer, T. M. (1994). Water supply development for membrane water treatment facilities. Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers. 253 p.Google Scholar
  10. Missimer, T. M. (2009). Water supply development, aquifer storage, and concentrate disposal for membrane water treatment facilities (2nd ed.). Methods in Water Resources Evaluation Series No. 1 Houston, Texas, Schlumberger Water Services, Sugar Land, Texas.Google Scholar
  11. Missimer, T. M., Ghaffour, N., Dehwah, H. A., Rachman, R., Maliva, R. G., & Amy, G. (2013). Subsurface intakes for seawater reverse osmosis facilities: Capacity limitation, water quality improvement, and economics. Desalination, 322, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Missimer, T. M., Jadoon, K. Z., Li, D., Hoppe-Jones, C., & Al-Mashharawi, S. (2014). Hydrogeology and water quality of a coastal alluvial aquifer and its potential use as an intake system for a seawater reverse osmosis water treatment system, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. Hydrogeology Journal, Doi:  10.1007/s10040-014-1168-3.
  13. Misstear, B., Banks, D., & Clark, L. (2006). Water wells and boreholes. Chichester, England: Wiley. 498 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. National Research Council. (2008). Desalination—A National Perspective. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press. 298 p.Google Scholar
  15. Peters, T., Pintó, D., & Pintó, E. (2007). Improved seawater intake and pre-treatment system based on Neodren technology. Desalination, 201(1–3), 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peters, T., & Pintó, D. (2010). Seawater intake and partial pre-treatment with Neodren—results from investigation and long-term operation. Desalination and Water Treatment, 24(1–3), 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rachman, R. M., Li, S., & Missimer, T. M. (2014). SWRO feed water quality improvement using subsurface intakes in Oman, Spain, Turks and Caicos Islands, and Saudi Arabia. Desalination 351, 88–100. Doi:  10.1016/j.desal.2014.07.032.
  18. Roscoe Moss Company. (1990). Handbook of ground water development. New York: Wiley. 493 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sterrett, R. J. (2007). Groundwater and wells (3rd ed.). St. Paul, Minnesota: Johnson Screens, 812 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Voutchkov, N. (2005). SWRO desalination: On the beach—seawater intakes. Filtration and Separation, 10, 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. WateReuse Association. (2011). Overview of desalination plant intake alternatives. White Paper, June 2011, WateReuse Association, Alexandria, VA, 19 p.Google Scholar
  22. Williams, D. E. (2008). Research and development for horizontal/angle well technology. Desalination and Water Purification Research and Development Program Report No. 151, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO, 62 p.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, D.E. (2009). Results of drilling, construction, development, and testing of Dana Point ocean desalination project test slant well. Research and Development for Horizontal/Angle Well Technology, Desalination and Water Purification Research and Development Program Report No. 152, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Denver CO, 62 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schlumberger Water ServicesFort MyersUSA
  2. 2.U.A. Whitaker College of EngineeringFort MyersUSA

Personalised recommendations