Abstract
It deals with the multiplying effect of homicides, or more precisely, the capacity of this type of action to turn contagious. At this point, the discussion focuses on the formation of a contextual morality which begins to mediate internal interactions between members of social groups most targeted by police and vigilantes—young men in the periphery. The revelation in the daily life that homicides were being illegally carried out by police in neighborhoods of periphery, through death squads or in allegedly legal operations, contributed to the undermining of confidence in public safety and legal institutions in these neighborhoods and their ability to control homicidal behavior. Homicide becomes a self-help tool and a means of survival in these environments, initiating in these neighborhoods a process of self-extermination where youths kill their peers out of fear of being killed by them. In the killer’s justifications, the victim was often to blame for their murder, and they “deserved to die” because they disrespected local norms and values. Cycles of revenge followed could last years. Friends and relatives of the dead victim would respond to these actions in kind. The narratives defending homicides were consistent with the risks at stake in that environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrade, M. V., & Lisboa, M. B. (2001). Mortalidade nos estados do Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo e Minas Gerais. Estudos Econômicos, 31(1), 5–56.
Baliga, Sandeep, David, O., Lucca, & Sjöström. (2004) Arms races and negotiations. Review of Economic Studies, 71(2): pp. 351–69.
Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (1993). Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 5). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loayza, N. (1998). Determinants of crime rates in Latin America and the world: An empirical assessment. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: www.worldbank.org/laccrime
Flaherty, B., & Sethi, R. (2008). Peaceable kingdoms and war zones. Ballistics and Murder in Newark: Preemption.
Glaeser, E. L., Sacerdote, B. I., & Scheikman, J. A. (2002). The social multiplier. Working paper 9153. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gottfredson, M. R, & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Standford University Press.
Hirata, D. V. (2010). Sobreviver na adversidade: entre o mercado e a vida. Tese (Doutorado) apresentada ao programa de pós-graduação de Sociologia da Universidade de São Paulo.
Schelling, T. C. (1960). Strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wikström, P. O., & Treiber, K. H. (2009). Violence as situational action. International Journal of Conflict Violence, 3(1): pp. 75–96.
Wilkison, Deanna and Fagan, Jeffrey. (2000). What do we know about gun use among adolescents? Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence. University of Colorado.
Zaluar, A. E., & Ribeiro, A. P. A. (2009), “Teoria da Eficácia Coletiva e Violência: O Paradoxo do Subúrbio Carioca”. Novos Estudos Cebrap, no 84, São Paulo. Disponível em http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002009000200010
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Manso, B.P. (2016). The Multiplier Effect of Homicides. In: Homicide in São Paulo. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13165-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13165-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13164-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13165-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)