Advertisement

An Evaluation of an Interactive Federated Patent Search System

  • Michail Salampasis
  • Anastasia Giachanou
  • Allan Hanbury
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8849)

Abstract

Patent search tasks are challenging and often require many hours or even days to be completed. Patent search systems that integrate multiple search tools could assist patent examiners to complete the demanding patent search tasks by using the set of search tools most suitable for the task at hand. PerFedPat is an interactive patent search system designed on this principle and based on the federated search approach and the ezDL framework. PerFedPat provides core services to search multiple online patent resources, while hiding complexity from the end user. The extensible architecture of the system enables the integration and parallel use of multiple search tools. In this paper, we present part of a user study of the PerFedPat system and we also discuss the results, mostly focused on the research question: could the patent examiners efficiently use a patent search system that integratesmultiple resources, search tools and UIs?

Keywords

patent retrieval interactive search systems user evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, S.: Using the International Patent Classification in an online environment. World Pat. Inf. 22(4), 291–300 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates, M.J.: Idea Tactics. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 30(5), 280–289 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Callan, J.P., Lu, Z., Croft, W.B.: Searching distributed collections with inference networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 21–28. ACM (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fuhr, N.: An Infrastructure for Supporting the Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Data infrastructurEs for Supporting Information Retrieval Evaluation (DESIRE 2011), pp. 1–2 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giachanou, A., Salampasis, M., Paltoglou, G.: Multilayer Collection Selection and Search of Topically Organized Patents. Integrating IR Technologies for Professional Search (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giachanou, A., Salampasis, M., Satratzemi, M., Samaras, N.: A User-Centered Evaluation of a Web Based Patent Classification Tool. In: Proceedings of the Workshop “Beyond Single-shot Text Queries: Bridging the Gap(s) between Research Communities” Co-located with iConference 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lupu, M., Hanbury, A.: Patent Retrieval. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 7(1) (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nottelmann, H., Fuhr, N.: Evaluating different methods of estimating retrieval quality for resource selection. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Informaion Retrieval - SIGIR 2003, pp. 290–297. ACM, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salampasis, M., Hanbury, A.: A generalized framework for Integrated Professional Search Systems. In: Lupu, M., Kanoulas, E., Loizides, F. (eds.) IRFC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8201, pp. 99–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salampasis, M., Hanbury, A.: PerFedPat: An Integrated Federated System for Patent Search. To Appear World Pat. Inf. (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salampasis, M., Paltoglou, G., Giahanou, A.: Report on the CLEF-IP 2012 Experiments: Search of Topically Organized Patents. CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop) (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shokouhi, M., Si, L.: Federated Search. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 5(1), 1–102 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Si, L., Jin, R., Callan, J.P., Ogilvie, P.: A language modeling framework for resource selection and results merging. In: ACM CIKM 2002, pp. 391–397. ACM Press (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vijvers, W.G.: The international patent classification as a search tool. World Pat. Inf. 12(1), 26–30 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michail Salampasis
    • 1
  • Anastasia Giachanou
    • 2
  • Allan Hanbury
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Software Technology and Interactive SystemsVienna University of TechnologyAustria
  2. 2.Faculty of Informatics, Information Retrieval GroupUniversity of LuganoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations