Mean–Variance Mapping Optimization Algorithm for Power System Applications in DIgSILENT PowerFactory

  • Jaime C. Cepeda
  • José Luis Rueda
  • István Erlich
  • Abdul W. Korai
  • Francisco M. Gonzalez-Longatt
Chapter
Part of the Power Systems book series (POWSYS)

Abstract

The development and application of heuristic optimization algorithms have gained a renewed interest due to the limitations of classical optimization tools for tackling several hard-to-solve problems in different engineering fields. Due to the complex nature of power system dynamics, electrical engineering optimization problems usually present a discontinuous multimodal and non-convex landscape that necessarily has to be handled by heuristic optimization algorithms. While most of the pioneer heuristic optimization approaches, such as genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, and differential evolution, are undergoing different types of modifications and extensions in order to improve their performance, great focus is also being put into the development of new approaches aiming at conceptual simplicity, easy adaptability for a variety of optimization-based applications, and outstanding performance. The mean–variance mapping optimization (MVMO) is a recent contribution to the family of evolutionary optimization algorithms. Its novel search mechanism performs within a normalized range of the search space for all optimization variables and follows a single parent–offspring pair approach. Besides, MVMO is characterized by a continuously updated knowledge archive storing the n-best solutions achieved so far, from which a special mapping function, which accounts for the mean and variance of the optimization variables, is applied for mutation operation. In this way, the algorithm proceeds by projecting randomly selected variables onto the corresponding mapping function that guides the solution toward the best set achieved so far. Despite the orientation on the best solution, the algorithm keeps on searching globally. This chapter addresses key aspects concerning the implementation of MVMO by using DIgSILENT programming language (DPL). An exemplary application on the coordinated tuning of power system supplementary damping controllers is presented and discussed in order to highlight the feasibility and effectiveness of structuring MVMO-based applications in DIgSILENT PowerFactory environment.

Keywords

DIgSILENT programming language Damping control Heuristic optimization Mean–variance mapping optimization Power system stability 

Supplementary material

321979_1_En_12_MOESM1_ESM.zip (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (ZIP 1447 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cepeda JC, Rueda JL, Erlich I (2012) Identification of dynamic equivalents based on heuristic optimization for smart grid applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chamba MS, Añó O (2013) Economic dispatch of energy and reserve in competitive markets using meta-heuristic algorithms. IEEE Latin Am Trans 11(1):473–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chiong R, Weise T, Michalewicz Z (eds) (2012) Variants of evolutionary algorithms for real-world applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DIgSILENT GmbH (2011) DIgSILENT PowerFactory Version 14.1 User’s Manual, Gomaringen, Germany, May 2011Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erlich I, Venayagamoorthy GK, Nakawiro W (2010) A mean-variance optimization algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Erlich I, Nakawiro W, Martinez M (2011) Optimal dispatch of reactive sources in wind farms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE PES general meeting, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee KY, El-Sharkawi MA (eds) (2008) Modern heuristic optimization techniques. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Machowski J, Bialek J, Bumby J (2008) Power system dynamics: stability and control. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakawiro W, Erlich I, Rueda JL (2011) A novel optimization algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch: a comparative study. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on electric utility deregulation and restructuring and power technologies, pp 1555–1561Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pringles R, Rueda JL (2012) Optimal transmission expansion planning using mean-variance mapping optimization. In: Proceedings of the sixth IEEE/PES transmission and distribution: Latin America conference and exposition, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogers G (2000) Power system oscillations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rueda JL, Guamán WH, Cepeda JC, Erlich I, Vargas A (2013) Hybrid approach for power system operational planning with smart grid and small-signal stability enhancement considerations. IEEE Trans Smart Grid—Spec Issue Comput Intell Appl Smart Grids 4(1):530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simon D (2013) Evolutionary optimization algorithms: biologically inspired and population-based approaches to computer intelligence. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Talbi EG (2009) Metaheuristics: from design to implementation. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaime C. Cepeda
    • 1
  • José Luis Rueda
    • 2
  • István Erlich
    • 3
  • Abdul W. Korai
    • 4
  • Francisco M. Gonzalez-Longatt
    • 5
  1. 1.Corporación Centro Nacional de Control de Energía—CENACEQuitoEcuador
  2. 2.Department of Electrical Sustainable EnergyDelft University of TechnologyCD DelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Electrical Engineering and Information TechnologiesUniversity Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Electrical Power SystemsUniversity Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany
  5. 5.School of Electronic, Electrical and Systems EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations