Skip to main content

Contrastive Max-Sum Opinion Summarization

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8870))

Abstract

People can reach all kinds of information online incuding reviews and comments on products, movies, holiday destinations and so on. However, one usually need to go through the reviews to have an objective opinion the positive and the negative aspects of the item reviewed. We aim to provie a method that will extract positive and negative opinions on a specific aspect and compare them in an attempt to ease on the information overflow. Contrastive opinion summarization (COS) aims to solve this issue. COS methods extract representative and comparative sentences in terms of specific aspects of a product. In this paper, we propose a new COS method, namely Contrastive Max-Sum Opinion Summarization (CMSOS). This method considers representativeness and contrastiveness at the same time. For the evaluation, we use an English dataset which was specifically created for COS studies. In addition, we created a new dataset in Turkish and shared it publicly. We provide the results on both datasets with our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boynukalın, Z., Karagöz, P.: Emotion analysis on Turkish texts. In: Gelenbe, E., Lent, R. (eds.) Information Sciences and Systems 2013. LNEE, vol. 264, pp. 159–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Eroğul, U.: Sentiment Analysis in Turkish. Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gollapudi, S., Sharma, A.: An axiomatic approach for result diversification. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2009, pp. 381–390. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2004, pp. 168–177. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Identifying comparative sentences in text documents. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2006, pp. 244–251. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kavasoğlu, Z., Gündüz Öğüdücü, S.: Personalized summarization of customer reviews based on user’s browsing history. International Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems 8, 147–158 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaya, M., Fidan, G., Toroslu, H.: Transfer learning using twitter data for improving sentiment classification of Turkish political news. In: Gelenbe, E., Lent, R. (eds.) Information Sciences and Systems 2013. LNEE, vol. 264, pp. 139–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, H.D., Zhai, C.: Generating comparative summaries of contradictory opinions in text. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2009, pp. 385–394. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lerman, K., McDonald, R.: Contrastive summarization: An experiment with consumer reviews. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Companion Volume: Short Papers, NAACL-Short 2009, pp. 113–116. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, B., Hu, M., Cheng, J.: Opinion observer: Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2005, pp. 342–351. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Malouf, R., Mullen, T.: Taking sides: User classification for informal online political discourse. Internet Research (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mei, Q., Ling, X., Wondra, M., Su, H., Zhai, C.: Topic sentiment mixture: Modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2007, pp. 171–180. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paul, M.J., Zhai, C., Girju, R.: Summarizing contrastive viewpoints in opinionated text. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2010, pp. 66–76. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sipos, R., Joachims, T.: Generating comparative summaries from reviews. In: CIKM, pp. 1853–1856 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas, M., Pang, B., Lee, L.: Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2006, pp. 327–335. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Özsoy, M.G., Çakıcı, R. (2014). Contrastive Max-Sum Opinion Summarization. In: Jaafar, A., et al. Information Retrieval Technology. AIRS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8870. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12844-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12844-3_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12843-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12844-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics