Skip to main content

Variance Identity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation

Part of the book series: Applied Mathematical Sciences ((AMS,volume 192))

  • 4856 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we consider the variance identity and its applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This second proof will become useful when we discuss the variance identity on a bounded domain (Sect. 16.8.1).

  2. 2.

    By equivalent we mean that both conservation laws follow from the invariance of the action integral under dilations (see [220, 247, 249] for derivation of NLS conservation laws via Noether Theorem).

  3. 3.

    See Conclusion 2.12.

  4. 4.

    The condition \(H(\psi _0)<0\) is not sharp, i.e., collapse can also occur for real initial conditions with a positive Hamiltonian (Sect. 7.4). Hence, nonlinearity can be stronger than diffraction even when \(H(\psi _0)>0\).

  5. 5.

    In the critical case, it can be rigorously shown that if \(0< -F\le Z_\mathrm{c}\), where \(Z_\mathrm{c}\) is the blowup point of \(\psi \), then \(\tilde{\psi }\) does not blowup (Sect. 8.4.6). In the supercritical case, it can be informally shown that collapse is arrested when \(-F\) is sufficiently small (Sect. 8.4.2).

  6. 6.

    The converse statement is not true, i.e., the condition \(H\big (\tilde{\psi }_0\big )> 0\) does not necessarily imply that nonlinearity is weaker than the combined effects of diffraction and the lens.

  7. 7.

    We already reached this conclusion when we analyzed the NLS with the aberrationless approximation method (Sect. 3.5).

  8. 8.

    See Sects. 2.12.3 and 8.2 for the mathematical representation of tilted beams.

  9. 9.

    This is the case, e.g., when \(\psi _0\) is real or radially-symmetric.

  10. 10.

    Knowing the amount of power that collapses into the singularity is important in applications where one wants to maximize (or control) the amount of power at the “target”.

  11. 11.

    See Sects. 13.2 and 14.6 for the critical case, and Sect. 21.1 for the supercritical case.

  12. 12.

    These results can be generalized to focused initial conditions by using Lemma 7.11.

  13. 13.

    See Sect. 8.4.3 for an alternative proof, which is based on the lens transformation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gadi Fibich .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fibich, G. (2015). Variance Identity. In: The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol 192. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12748-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics