On RAF Sets and Autocatalytic Cycles in Random Reaction Networks

  • Alessandro Filisetti
  • Marco Villani
  • Chiara Damiani
  • Alex Graudenzi
  • Andrea Roli
  • Wim Hordijk
  • Roberto Serra
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 445)

Abstract

The emergence of autocatalytic sets of molecules seems to have played an important role in the origin of life context. Although the possibility to reproduce this emergence in laboratory has received considerable attention, this is still far from being achieved.

In order to unravel some key properties enabling the emergence of structures potentially able to sustain their own existence and growth, in this work we investigate the probability to observe them in ensembles of random catalytic reaction networks characterized by different structural properties.

From the point of view of network topology, an autocatalytic set have been defined either in term of strongly connected components (SCCs) or as reflexively autocatalytic and food-generated sets (RAFs).

We observe that the average level of catalysis differently affects the probability to observe a SCC or a RAF, highlighting the existence of a region where the former can be observed, whereas the latter cannot. This parameter also affects the composition of the RAF, which can be further characterized into linear structures, autocatalysis or SCCs.

Interestingly, we show that the different network topology (uniform as opposed to power-law catalysis systems) does not have a significantly divergent impact on SCCs and RAFs appearance, whereas the proportion between cleavages and condensations seems instead to play a role.

A major factor that limits the probability of RAF appearance and that may explain some of the difficulties encountered in laboratory seems to be the presence of molecules which can accumulate without being substrate or catalyst of any reaction.

References

  1. 1.
    Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., Walter, P.: Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4, 5 edn. Garland Science, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bagley, R., Farmer, J.D.: Spontaneous emergence of a metabolism. In: Langton, C. (ed.) Artificial Life II. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol. X, pp. 93–141. Addison-Wesley, Redwood (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carletti, T., Serra, R., Villani, M., Poli, I., Filisetti, A.: Sufficient conditions for emergent synchronization in protocell models. J. Theor. Biol. 254(4), 741–751 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diester, R.: Graph Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dyson, F.: Origins of Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eigen, M., Schuster, P.: The hypercycle. a principle of natural self-organization. part A: Emergence of the hypercycle. Die Naturwiss. 11(64), 541–565 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eigen, M., Schuster, P.: The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization. Springer, New York (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farmer, J., Kauffman, S.: Autocatalytic replication of polymers. Phys. D 220, 50–67 (1986)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Filisetti, A., Graudenzi, A., Serra, R., Villani, M., De Lucrezia, D., Fuchslin, R.M., Kauffman, S.A., Packard, N., Poli, I.: A stochastic model of the emergence of autocatalytic cycles. J. Syst. Chem. 2(1), 2 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Filisetti, A., Graudenzi, A., Serra, R., Villani, M., De Lucrezia, D., Poli, I.: The role of energy in a stochastic model of the emergence of autocatalytic sets. In: Lenaerts, T., Giacobini, M., Bersini, H., Bourgine, P., Dorigo, M., Doursat, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems Advances in Artificial Life, ECAL 2011, pp. 227–234. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Filisetti, A., Graudenzi, A., Serra, R., Villani, M., Füchslin, R.M., Packard, N., Kauffman, S.A., Poli, I.: A stochastic model of autocatalytic reaction networks. Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, pp. 1–9, Oct 2011Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Filisetti, A., Serra, R., Carletti, T., Villani, M., Poli, I.: Non-linear protocell models: synchronization and chaos. Eur. Phys. J. B 77(2), 249–256 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Filisetti, A., Serra, R., Villani, M., Graudenzi, A., Füchslin, R.M., Poli, I.: The influence of the residence time on the dynamics of catalytic reaction networks. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications - Neural Nets WIRN10 - Proceedings of the 20th Italian Workshop on Neural Nets, pp. 243–251 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ganti, T.: Chemoton Theory, vol. I: Theory of fluyd machineries: vol. II: Theory of livin system. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hordijk, W., Kauffman, S.A., Steel, M.: Required levels of catalysis for emergence of autocatalytic sets in models of chemical reaction systems. Int. J. Mo. Sci. 12(5), 3085–3101 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hordijk, W., Steel, M.: Detecting autocatalytic, self-sustaining sets in chemical reaction systems. J. Theor. Biol. 227(4), 451–461 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hordijk, W., Steel, M., Kauffman, S.: The Structure of Autocatalytic Sets: Evolvability, Enablement, and Emergence, p. 12, May 2012Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jain, S., Krishna, S.: Autocatalytic set and the growth of complexity in an evolutionary model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5684–5687 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jain, S., Krishna, S.: A model for the emergence of cooperation, interdependence, and structure in evolving networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 98(2), 543–547 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kauffman, S.A.: Autocatalytic sets of proteins. J. Theor. Biol. 119(1), 1–24 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kauffman, S.A.: The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luisi, P., Ferri, F., Stano, P.: Approaches to semi-synthetic minimal cells: a review. Naturwissenschaften 93(1), 1–13 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mansy, S.S., Schrum, J.P., Krishnamurthy, M., Tobé, S., Treco, D.A., Szostak, J.W.: Template-directed synthesis of a genetic polymer in a model protocell. Nature 454(7200), 122–125 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mossel, E., Steel, M.: Random biochemical networks: the probability of self-sustaining autocatalysis. J. Theor. Biol. 233(3), 327–336 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rasmussen, S., Chen, L., Nilsson, M., Abe, S.: Bridging nonliving and living matter. Artif. Life 9(3), 269–316 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rocheleau, T., Rasmussen, S., Nielsen, P.E., Jacobi, M.N., Ziock, H.: Emergence of protocellular growth laws. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 362(1486), 1841–1845 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schmidt, L.: The Engineering of Chemical Reactions. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Segre, D., Lancet, D., Kedem, O., Pilpel, Y.: Graded autocatalysis replication domain (gard): kinetic analysis of self-replication in mutually catalytic sets. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 28, 501–514 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Serra, R., Carletti, T., Poli, I.: Syncronization phenomena in surface-reaction models of protocells. Artif. Life 123(2), 123–138 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Serra, R., Filisetti, A., Villani, M., Graudenzi, A., Damiani, C., Panini, T.: A stochastic model of catalytic reaction networks in protocells. Nat. Comput. (2014).doi:10.1007/s11047-014-9445-6
  32. 32.
    Solé, R.V., Munteanu, A., Rodriguez-Caso, C., Macía, J.: Synthetic protocell biology: from reproduction to computation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 362(1486), 1727–1739 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stadler, P.F.: Dynamics of autocatalytic reaction networks. IV: Inhomogeneous replicator networks. Bio. Syst. 26(1), 1–19 (1991)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Szostak, J.W., Bartel, D.P., Luisi, P.L.: Synthesizing life. Nature 409(6818), 387–390 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Filisetti
    • 1
  • Marco Villani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chiara Damiani
    • 3
  • Alex Graudenzi
    • 3
  • Andrea Roli
    • 4
  • Wim Hordijk
    • 5
  • Roberto Serra
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.European Centre for Living TechnologyUniversity Ca’ Foscari of VeniceVeniceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Informatics and MathematicsUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Informatics, Systems and CommunicationUniversity of Milano BicoccaMilanItaly
  4. 4.Department of Computer Science and Engineering (DISI)University of BolognaBolognaItaly
  5. 5.SmartAnalytiX.comLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations