Skip to main content

Dangerous Terrorists as Devoted Actors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Psychology ((EVOLPSYCH))

Abstract

Recent cross-cultural experiments and fieldwork related to violent extremism in hotspots around the world suggest that the most dangerous and effective terrorists today are “devoted actors.” Devoted actors are chiefly motivated by “sacred values” (SVs), which are operationally identified in terms of immunity or resistance to material trade-offs, to normative social influence, and to exit strategies. Devoted actors are particularly likely to make costly and extreme sacrifices in defense of SVs when their personal identities are “fused” with the collective identity of a primary reference group, such as a tight-knit religious “brotherhood” of imagined kin. There is an evolutionary rationale for the willingness to make costly sacrifices (e.g., death) for the group. When a perceived outside threat to one’s primary reference group is very high, and survival prospects very low, then only if sufficiently many members of a group are endowed with such a willingness to extreme sacrifice can the group hope to parry stronger but less devoted enemies. SVs mobilized for collective action by devoted actors enable outsize commitment in low-power groups to resist and often prevail against materially more powerful foes who depend on standard material incentives, such as armies and police that rely on pay and promotion. Recent changes in the composition of some terrorist groups from fairly well-educated and well-off founders to increasingly marginalized youth in transitional stages of life follow this evolutionary rationale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arreguín-Toft, I. (2001). How the weak win wars. International Security, 26, 93–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (2003). Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science, 299, 1534–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (2010a). Talking to the enemy: Violent extremism, sacred values, and what it means to be human. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (2010b). A question of honor: Why the Taliban fight and what to do about It. Asian Journal of Social Science, 38, 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (2011). US Government Efforts to Counter Violent Extremism, US Senate Armed Services Committee, 2010–2011 (Testimony, Response to Questions); http://www.jjay.cuny.edu/US_Senate_Hearing_on_Violent_Extremism.pdf.

  • Atran, S. (2013). Black and white and red all over: How the hyperkinetic media is breeding a new generation of terrorists. Foreign Policy. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/04/22/black_and_white_and_red_all_over_boston_bombing_terrorists_media.

  • Atran, S., & Axelrod, R. (2008). Reframing sacred values. Negotiation Journal, 24, 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., & Ginges, J. (2012). Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science, 336, 855–857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., & Henrich, J. (2010). The evolution of religion. Biological Theory, 5, 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religions evolutionary landscape. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 713–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., Axelrod, R., & Davis, R. (2007). Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science, 317, 1039–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., & Ginges, J. (2015). Devoted actors and the moral foundations of intractable inter-group conflict. In J. Decety & T. Wheatley (Eds.), The moral brain (pp. 69-85). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., Sheikh, H., & Gómez, Á. (2014a). Devoted actors fight for close comrades and sacred cause. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 17702–17703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., Sheikh, H., & Gómez, Á. (2014b). For cause and comrade: Devoted actors and willingness to fight. Cliodynamics, 5, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, N., André, J., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic theory of morality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 59–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1962). Irrational behavior and economic theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 70, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, P., & Lind, M. (2007). A matter of pride: Why we can’t buy off Osama Bin Laden. Democracy Journal. www.democracyjournal.org/article.php?ID†=6496.

  • Bennis, W., Medin, D., & Bartels, D. (2010). The costs and benefits of calculations and moral rules. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berns, G. S., Bell, E., Capra, C. M., Perietula, M. J., Moore, S., Anderson, B., Ginges, J, & Atran, S. (2012). The price of your soul: Neural evidence for the nonutilitarian representation of sacred values. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal SocietyB, 367, 754–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berns, G., Bell, E., & Capra, M. (2013). Moral outrage and the neurobiological antecedents to political conflict. Presented to AFOSR Annual Trust and Influence Review, Dayton, OH, January 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brin, D. (2012). A contrarian perspective on altruism. In B. Oakley, A. Knafo, G. Muadhavan, & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), Pathological altruism (pp. 77–84). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (2006). Terrorism: The relevance of the rational choice model. Public Choice, 128, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J.-K., & Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318, 636–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehghani, M., Atran, S. Iliev, Sachdeva, R., Ginges J., & Medin, D. (2010). Sacred values and conflict over Iran’s nuclear program. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 540–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49, 379–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. (2004). Dealing with terrorism: Stick or Carrot? Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D., & Hertog, S. (2007). Engineers of Jihad. Sociology Working Papers, no. 2007–10; http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/users/gambetta/Engineers%20of%20Jihad.pdf.

  • Ganor, B. (2009). Terrorism in the twenty-first century. In S. Shapira, J. Hammond, & L. Cole (Eds.), Essentials of terror medicine (pp. 13–26). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.). (2009). The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2009). Why do people participate in violent collective action? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 115–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2011). War as a moral imperative. Proceedings of the Royal SocietyB, 278, 2930–2938.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ginges, J., Atran, S., Medin, D., & Shikaki, K. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 7357–7360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginges, J., Atran, S., Sachdeva, S., & Medin, D. (2011). Psychology out of the laboratory: The challenge of violent extremism. American Psychologist, 66, 507–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2013). Sacred values and evil adversaries. In P. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), The social psychology of morality (pp. 11–31). New York: APA Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651/1901). Leviathan. New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B., & McCormick, G. (2004). Terrorism, signaling, and suicide attack. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 27, 243–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa, S. (2007). The evolutionary psychological imagination. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 1, 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magouirk, J., Atran, S., & Sageman, M. (2008). Connecting terrorist networks. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 31, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P. (2005). Ethnic nationalism, evolutionary psychology and genetic similarity theory. Nations and Nationalism, 11, 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sageman, M. (2004). Understanding terror networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sageman, M. (2009). Confronting al-Qaeda. Testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, October 7; http://www.ebookdb.org/reading/31347CGA1773512938272C69/Confronting-Al-Qaeda-Understanding-The-Threat-In-Afghanistan-And-Beyond-Congres.

  • Sheikh, H., Atran, S., Ginges, J., Wilson, L., Obeid, N., & Davis. R. (2014). The devoted actor as parochial altruist: Sectarian morality, identity fusion, and support for costly sacrifices. Cliodynamics, 5, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, H., Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2013). Sacred values in intergroup conflict. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1299, 11–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, H., Ginges, J., Coman, A., & Atran, S. (2012). Religion, group threat and sacred values. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 110–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., Kress, H., & Boster, J. (2007). Scars for war: Evaluating alternative signaling explanations for cross-cultural variance in ritual costs. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 234–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W., Jetten, J., Gómez, Á., Whitehouse, H., & Bastian, B. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119, 441–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W., Buhrmester, M., Gómez, Á., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., Vázquez, A., & Zhang, A. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 912–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Slyke, J. (2014). Moral psychology, neuroscience, and virtue. In K. Timpe & C. Boyd (Eds.), Virtues and their vices (pp. 459–480). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Clausewitz, C. (1832/1956). On war. New York: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, R. (2006). Rational extremism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zarate, J. (2013). Treasury’s war. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-827313, SES-0962080), the MINERVA programs of the Office of Naval Research (N000141310054), and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-14-1-0030 DEF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Atran Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Atran, S., Sheikh, H. (2015). Dangerous Terrorists as Devoted Actors. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L., Shackelford, T. (eds) Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics