Abstract
Recent cross-cultural experiments and fieldwork related to violent extremism in hotspots around the world suggest that the most dangerous and effective terrorists today are “devoted actors.” Devoted actors are chiefly motivated by “sacred values” (SVs), which are operationally identified in terms of immunity or resistance to material trade-offs, to normative social influence, and to exit strategies. Devoted actors are particularly likely to make costly and extreme sacrifices in defense of SVs when their personal identities are “fused” with the collective identity of a primary reference group, such as a tight-knit religious “brotherhood” of imagined kin. There is an evolutionary rationale for the willingness to make costly sacrifices (e.g., death) for the group. When a perceived outside threat to one’s primary reference group is very high, and survival prospects very low, then only if sufficiently many members of a group are endowed with such a willingness to extreme sacrifice can the group hope to parry stronger but less devoted enemies. SVs mobilized for collective action by devoted actors enable outsize commitment in low-power groups to resist and often prevail against materially more powerful foes who depend on standard material incentives, such as armies and police that rely on pay and promotion. Recent changes in the composition of some terrorist groups from fairly well-educated and well-off founders to increasingly marginalized youth in transitional stages of life follow this evolutionary rationale.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. New York: Verso.
Arreguín-Toft, I. (2001). How the weak win wars. International Security, 26, 93–128.
Atran, S. (2003). Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science, 299, 1534–1539.
Atran, S. (2010a). Talking to the enemy: Violent extremism, sacred values, and what it means to be human. London: Penguin.
Atran, S. (2010b). A question of honor: Why the Taliban fight and what to do about It. Asian Journal of Social Science, 38, 341–361.
Atran, S. (2011). US Government Efforts to Counter Violent Extremism, US Senate Armed Services Committee, 2010–2011 (Testimony, Response to Questions); http://www.jjay.cuny.edu/US_Senate_Hearing_on_Violent_Extremism.pdf.
Atran, S. (2013). Black and white and red all over: How the hyperkinetic media is breeding a new generation of terrorists. Foreign Policy. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/04/22/black_and_white_and_red_all_over_boston_bombing_terrorists_media.
Atran, S., & Axelrod, R. (2008). Reframing sacred values. Negotiation Journal, 24, 221–246.
Atran, S., & Ginges, J. (2012). Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science, 336, 855–857.
Atran, S., & Henrich, J. (2010). The evolution of religion. Biological Theory, 5, 18–30.
Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religions evolutionary landscape. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 713–770.
Atran, S., Axelrod, R., & Davis, R. (2007). Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science, 317, 1039–1040.
Atran, S., & Ginges, J. (2015). Devoted actors and the moral foundations of intractable inter-group conflict. In J. Decety & T. Wheatley (Eds.), The moral brain (pp. 69-85). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Atran, S., Sheikh, H., & Gómez, Á. (2014a). Devoted actors fight for close comrades and sacred cause. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 17702–17703.
Atran, S., Sheikh, H., & Gómez, Á. (2014b). For cause and comrade: Devoted actors and willingness to fight. Cliodynamics, 5, 23–40.
Baumard, N., André, J., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic theory of morality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 59–122.
Becker, G. (1962). Irrational behavior and economic theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 70, 1–13.
Bergen, P., & Lind, M. (2007). A matter of pride: Why we can’t buy off Osama Bin Laden. Democracy Journal. www.democracyjournal.org/article.php?ID†=6496.
Bennis, W., Medin, D., & Bartels, D. (2010). The costs and benefits of calculations and moral rules. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 187–202.
Berns, G. S., Bell, E., Capra, C. M., Perietula, M. J., Moore, S., Anderson, B., Ginges, J, & Atran, S. (2012). The price of your soul: Neural evidence for the nonutilitarian representation of sacred values. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society–B, 367, 754–762.
Berns, G., Bell, E., & Capra, M. (2013). Moral outrage and the neurobiological antecedents to political conflict. Presented to AFOSR Annual Trust and Influence Review, Dayton, OH, January 16.
Brin, D. (2012). A contrarian perspective on altruism. In B. Oakley, A. Knafo, G. Muadhavan, & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), Pathological altruism (pp. 77–84). New York: Oxford University Press.
Caplan, B. (2006). Terrorism: The relevance of the rational choice model. Public Choice, 128, 91–107.
Choi, J.-K., & Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318, 636–640.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
Dehghani, M., Atran, S. Iliev, Sachdeva, R., Ginges J., & Medin, D. (2010). Sacred values and conflict over Iran’s nuclear program. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 540–546.
Fearon, J. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49, 379–414.
Frey, B. (2004). Dealing with terrorism: Stick or Carrot? Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gambetta, D., & Hertog, S. (2007). Engineers of Jihad. Sociology Working Papers, no. 2007–10; http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/users/gambetta/Engineers%20of%20Jihad.pdf.
Ganor, B. (2009). Terrorism in the twenty-first century. In S. Shapira, J. Hammond, & L. Cole (Eds.), Essentials of terror medicine (pp. 13–26). New York: Springer.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.). (2009). The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2009). Why do people participate in violent collective action? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 115–123.
Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2011). War as a moral imperative. Proceedings of the Royal Society–B, 278, 2930–2938.
Ginges, J., Atran, S., Medin, D., & Shikaki, K. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 7357–7360.
Ginges, J., Atran, S., Sachdeva, S., & Medin, D. (2011). Psychology out of the laboratory: The challenge of violent extremism. American Psychologist, 66, 507–519.
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2013). Sacred values and evil adversaries. In P. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), The social psychology of morality (pp. 11–31). New York: APA Books.
Hobbes, T. (1651/1901). Leviathan. New York: E.P. Dutton.
Hoffman, B., & McCormick, G. (2004). Terrorism, signaling, and suicide attack. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 27, 243–281.
Kanazawa, S. (2007). The evolutionary psychological imagination. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 1, 7–17.
Magouirk, J., Atran, S., & Sageman, M. (2008). Connecting terrorist networks. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 31, 1–16.
Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rushton, J. P. (2005). Ethnic nationalism, evolutionary psychology and genetic similarity theory. Nations and Nationalism, 11, 489–507.
Sageman, M. (2004). Understanding terror networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Sageman, M. (2009). Confronting al-Qaeda. Testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, October 7; http://www.ebookdb.org/reading/31347CGA1773512938272C69/Confronting-Al-Qaeda-Understanding-The-Threat-In-Afghanistan-And-Beyond-Congres.
Sheikh, H., Atran, S., Ginges, J., Wilson, L., Obeid, N., & Davis. R. (2014). The devoted actor as parochial altruist: Sectarian morality, identity fusion, and support for costly sacrifices. Cliodynamics, 5, 23–40.
Sheikh, H., Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2013). Sacred values in intergroup conflict. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1299, 11–24.
Sheikh, H., Ginges, J., Coman, A., & Atran, S. (2012). Religion, group threat and sacred values. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 110–18.
Sosis, R., Kress, H., & Boster, J. (2007). Scars for war: Evaluating alternative signaling explanations for cross-cultural variance in ritual costs. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 234–247.
Swann, W., Jetten, J., Gómez, Á., Whitehouse, H., & Bastian, B. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119, 441–456.
Swann, W., Buhrmester, M., Gómez, Á., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., Vázquez, A., & Zhang, A. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 912–926.
Van Slyke, J. (2014). Moral psychology, neuroscience, and virtue. In K. Timpe & C. Boyd (Eds.), Virtues and their vices (pp. 459–480). New York: Oxford University Press.
von Clausewitz, C. (1832/1956). On war. New York: Barnes & Noble.
Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wintrobe, R. (2006). Rational extremism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zarate, J. (2013). Treasury’s war. New York: PublicAffairs.
Acknowledgment
Research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-827313, SES-0962080), the MINERVA programs of the Office of Naval Research (N000141310054), and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-14-1-0030 DEF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atran, S., Sheikh, H. (2015). Dangerous Terrorists as Devoted Actors. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L., Shackelford, T. (eds) Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12696-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12697-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)