Skip to main content

Evolutionary Cyberpsychology 2.0: Revisiting Some Old Predictions and Posting Some New Ones in the Age of Facebook

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Psychology ((EVOLPSYCH))

Abstract

Human interactions are changing in far-reaching ways due to recent developments in Internet and mobile communication technologies, including widespread uptake of Facebook and other online social networks. Cyberpsychology, the study of computer-mediated communication and Internet behavior, is a rapidly developing field that has largely gone unnoticed by evolutionary psychologists. Piazza and Bering (Comput Hum Behav 25:1258–1269, 2009) published a primer aimed at applying evolutionary perspectives to cyberpsychology. We review relevant research published in the interim that bears on these predictions to see how they have fared and determine what still needs to be done to address them. We give particular attention to research on social networking software—an area of cyberpsychology that has exploded in recent years—and offer some new hypotheses that reflect this trend. The chapter is organized around six broad themes from evolutionary psychology: mating, intrasexual competition, parenting and kinship, friendship, personal information management, and trust and social exchange. We discuss the nature of each topic as it applies to Internet behavior, review relevant hypotheses and research, and offer directions for future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Kingsbury, M., & Schneider, B. H. (2013). Friendship: An old concept with a new meaning? Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apicella, C. L, & Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Perceived mate fidelity and paternal resemblance predict men’s investment in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, P. (2004). Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J., & Coulson, M. (2010). Virtually real: A psychological perspective on massively multiplayer online games. Review of General Psychology, 14, 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. V., Kenrick, D. T., Guerin, S., & Maner, J. M. (2005). Concentrating on beauty: Sexual selection and sociospatial memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 1643–1652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bering, J. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2004). The causal role of consciousness: A conceptual addendum to human evolutionary psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 8, 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Shackelford, T. K. (1999). Differences in parental investment contribute to important differences between men and women. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 86–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of internet ties: The internet and email aid users in maintaining their social networks and provide pathways to help when people face big decisions. http://www.pewinternet.org/. Accessed 7 April 2008.

  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, R. L., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2000). Perceptions of paternal resemblance predict family violence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 429–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Larsen, R., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1128–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-H., Chien, S.-H., Wu, J.-J., & Tsai, P.-Y. (2010). Impact of signals and experience on trust and trusting behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 539–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, W.-B., Chen, S. W., & Liao, D.-C. (2013). Does Facebook promote self-interest? Enactment of indiscriminate one-to-many communication on online social networking sites decreases prosocial behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12, 341–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christophe, V., & Rimé, B. (1997). Exposure to the social sharing of emotion: Emotional impact, listener responses and secondary social sharing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. A. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. doi:10.1089/cybr.2012.0424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Evolutionary psychology and family homicide. Science, 242, 519–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daneback, K., Minsson, S.-A., & Ross, M. W. (2007). Using the Internet to find offline sex partners. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10, 100–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delevi, R., & Weisskirch, R. S. (2013). Personality factors as predictors of sexting. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2589–2594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). The alliance hypothesis for human friendship. PLoS ONE, 4, e5802.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donath, J. (2008). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, J. J., Pyzalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 217, 182–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreßing, H., Bailer, J., Anders, A., Wagner, H., & Gallas, C. (2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 17, 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drouin, M., Vogel, K. N., Surbey, A., & Stills, J. R. (2013). Let’s talk about sexting baby: Computer-mediated sexual behaviors among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, A25–A30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Social cognition on the Internet: Testing constraints on social network size. Proceedings from the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences, 367, 2192–2201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L. A., Park, J. H., Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Neuberg, S. L., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Adaptive allocation of attention: Effects of sex and sociosexuality on visual attention to attractive opposite-sex faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 359–364.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • eBay Worldwide. (2013). eBay—the world’s online marketplace. Retrieved November 2013 from http://pages.ebay.co.uk/aboutebay/thecompany/companyoverview.html.

  • Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implication for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 631–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facebook Newsroom. (2013). Key facts. Retrieved November 2013 from http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts.

  • Fehr, E., & Henrich, J. (2003). Is strong reciprocity a maladaptation? On the evolutionary foundations of human altruism. CESifo Working Paper, No. 859. Retrieved February 2015 from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/76253.

  • Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2013). Social relations and cyberbullying: The influence of individual and structural attributes on victimization and perpetration via the Internet. Human Communication Research, 39, 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye, N. E., & Dornisch, M. M. (2010). When is trust not enough? The role of perceived privacy of communication tools in comfort with self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1120–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gächter, S., & Falk, A. (2002). Reputation and reciprocity: Consequences for the labor relation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon-Messer, D., Bauermeister, J., Grodzinski, A., & Zimmerman, M. (2012). Sexting among young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 301–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.013.

  • Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A.-M., & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior: I & II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, K. N., Livio, O., & Goulet, L. S. (2010). The social life of wireless urban spaces: Internet use, social networks, and the public realm. Journal of Communication, 60, 701–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006). Psychological adaptations for assessing gossip veracity. Human Nature, 17, 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. E., Rodeheffer, C. D., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K., & White, A. E. (2012). Boosting beauty in an economic decline: Mating, spending, and the lipstick effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 275–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbaugh, E. E. (2010). Personal journal bloggers: Profiles of disclosiveness. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1657–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, J. B. (2008). Online shopping: Internet users like the convenience but worry about the security of their financial information. http://www.pewinternet.org/. Accessed 7 April 2008.

  • Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self- awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N., Paine, C. B., Buchanan, T., & Reips, U.-R. (2010). Privacy, trust and self- disclosure online. Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D., & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 21, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. E., & McKillop, K. J. (1996). Consequences of revealing personal secrets. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 450–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. E., Klusas, J. A., von Weiss, R. T., & Kenny, C. (2001). What is it about revealing secrets that is beneficial? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 651–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, privacy and online social networks. Retrieved from , April 18 2007 Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/.

  • Ljepava, N., Orr, R. R., Locke, S., & Ross, C. (2013). Personality and social characteristics of Facebook non-users and frequent users. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1602–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. (1999). Male care and mating effort among Hazda foragers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, F. T., & Jeong, H. S. (2012). Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2359–2365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, F. T., & Milenkovic, M. A. (2002). Of tabloids and family secrets: The evolutionary psychology of gossip. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 1064–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, F. T., & Shah, S. S. (2013). Sex differences in jealousy over Facebook activity. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2603–2606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. L., & Maner, J. K. (2010). Evolution and relationship maintenance: Fertility cues lead committed men to devalue relationship alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1081–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, D., Wellman, B., & Carrasco, J. (2010). Does distance matter in the age of the Internet? Urban Studies, 47, 2747–2783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 441–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muscanell, N. L., Guadagno, R. E., Rice, L., & Murphy, S. (2013). Don’t it make my brown eyes green? An analysis of Facebook use and romantic jealousy. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2012). Parental mediation of young children’s Internet use. http://111.lse.ac.uk/media%40lse/research/EUKidsOnline/Conference%202011/Nikken.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2013.

  • Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2008). Social networking profiles: An examination of student attitudes regarding use and appropriateness of content. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11, 95–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perilloux, C., Easton, J. A., & Buss, D. M. (2012). The misperception of sexual interest. Psychological Science, 23, 146–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2002). Understanding domestic violence against women: Using evolutionary psychology to extend the feminist functional analysis. Violence and Victims, 17, 255–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2013). Online dating and relationships. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Online-Dating/Summary-of-Findings.aspx.

  • Piazza, J., & Bering, J. M. (2009). Evolutionary cyber-psychology: Applying an evolutionary framework to Internet behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1258–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, J., & Bering, J. M. (2010). The coevolution of secrecy and stigmatization: Evidence from the content of distressing secrets. Human Nature, 21, 290–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, J., & DeScioli, P. (2012). Who else knows? The strategic significance of secrets. Poster presented at the Meeting for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V. (2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Use of social network sites and instant messaging does not lead to increased offline social network size, or to emotionally closer relationships with offline network members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11, 169–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. In M. R. Baye (Ed.), The economics of the Internet and e-commerce (pp. 127–157). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K. (2006). The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experimental Economics, 9, 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. (1998). Competitive altruism: From reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of Royal Society London B, 265, 427–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). The costs of family and friends: An 18-month longitudinal study of relationship maintenance and decay. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 186–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, H., Edelman, A., Falkenstern, M., & Stewart, C. (2010). The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and wellbeing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. H. (2000). Friends and enemies: Peer relations in childhood. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partner’s infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L. P., & Grant, T. (2007). Is cyberstalking different? Crime & Law, 13, 627–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silk, J. B. (2003). Cooperation without counting: The puzzle of friendship. In P. Hammerstein (Ed.), Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation (pp. 37–54). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk, J. B., Kaldor, E., & Boyd, R. (2000). Cheap talk when interests conflict. Animal Behavior, 59, 423–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solove, D. J. (2007). The future of reputation: Gossip, rumor, and privacy on the Internet. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spink, A., Koricich, A., Jansen, B. J., & Cole, C. (2004). Sexual information seeking on web search engines. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Statista. (2013). Number of worldwide active Amazon customer accounts from 2007 to 2012 (in millions). Retrieved November 2013 from http://www.statista.com/statistics/237810/number-of-active-amazon-customer-accounts-worldwide/.

  • Stefanone, M. A., & Jang, C.-Y. (2007). Writing for friends and family: The interpersonal nature of blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 123–140 (article 7).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steijn, W. M. P., & Schouten, A. P. (2013). Information sharing and relationships on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 16, 582–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Williams, S. (2007). Altruism among kin vs. nonkin: Effects of cost of help and reciprocal exchange. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylwester, K., & Roberts, G. (2013). Reputation-based partner choice is an effective alternative to indirect reciprocity in solving social dilemmas. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations. Human Communication Research, 28, 317–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Friend me or you’ll strain us: Understanding negative events that occur over social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 14, 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Self-affirmation underlies Facebook use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 321–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, L. P. (2012). Motives for Facebook use and expressing “true self” on the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1510–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10, 849–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasalou, A., Oostveen, A.-M., & Joinson, A. N. (2012). A case study of non-adoption: The values of location tracking in the family. Proceeding of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 779–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viegas, F. B. (2005). Bloggers’ expectations of privacy and accountability: An initial survey. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), (article 12). DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00260.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlahovic, T. A., Roberts, S., & Dunbar, R. (2012). Effects of duration and laughter on subjective happiness within different modes of communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 436–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L., & Shulman, H. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Bianchi, S. M., & Raley, S. B. (2005). Teenagers’ internet use and family rules: A research note. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1249–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M. T. (2003). Cyber-flirting: Playing at love on the internet. Theory & Psychology, 13, 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M. T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating: Men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M. T. (2007). Revealing the ‘real’ me, searching for the ‘actual’ you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1707–1723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M. T., & Quigley, L. (2008). Emotional and sexual infidelity offline and in cyberspace. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34, 461–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). An evolutionary psychological perspective on male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Violence and Victims, 8, 271–294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, M., & Silk, J. B. (2012). The role of tracking and tolerance in relationship among friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B., & Lester, D. (2004). Attitude toward buying online. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared R. Piazza Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Piazza, J., Ingram, G. (2015). Evolutionary Cyberpsychology 2.0: Revisiting Some Old Predictions and Posting Some New Ones in the Age of Facebook. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L., Shackelford, T. (eds) Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics