Advertisement

Evolutionary Cyberpsychology 2.0: Revisiting Some Old Predictions and Posting Some New Ones in the Age of Facebook

  • Jared R. PiazzaEmail author
  • Gordon P. D. Ingram
Chapter
Part of the Evolutionary Psychology book series (EVOLPSYCH)

Abstract

Human interactions are changing in far-reaching ways due to recent developments in Internet and mobile communication technologies, including widespread uptake of Facebook and other online social networks. Cyberpsychology, the study of computer-mediated communication and Internet behavior, is a rapidly developing field that has largely gone unnoticed by evolutionary psychologists. Piazza and Bering (Comput Hum Behav 25:1258–1269, 2009) published a primer aimed at applying evolutionary perspectives to cyberpsychology. We review relevant research published in the interim that bears on these predictions to see how they have fared and determine what still needs to be done to address them. We give particular attention to research on social networking software—an area of cyberpsychology that has exploded in recent years—and offer some new hypotheses that reflect this trend. The chapter is organized around six broad themes from evolutionary psychology: mating, intrasexual competition, parenting and kinship, friendship, personal information management, and trust and social exchange. We discuss the nature of each topic as it applies to Internet behavior, review relevant hypotheses and research, and offer directions for future studies.

Keywords

Cyberpsychology Internet Social networking Friendship Mating Parenting Kinship Intrasexual competition Computer-mediated communication 

References

  1. Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Kingsbury, M., & Schneider, B. H. (2013). Friendship: An old concept with a new meaning? Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apicella, C. L, & Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Perceived mate fidelity and paternal resemblance predict men’s investment in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barclay, P. (2004). Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, J., & Coulson, M. (2010). Virtually real: A psychological perspective on massively multiplayer online games. Review of General Psychology, 14, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, D. V., Kenrick, D. T., Guerin, S., & Maner, J. M. (2005). Concentrating on beauty: Sexual selection and sociospatial memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 1643–1652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bering, J. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2004). The causal role of consciousness: A conceptual addendum to human evolutionary psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 8, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bjorklund, D. F., & Shackelford, T. K. (1999). Differences in parental investment contribute to important differences between men and women. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of internet ties: The internet and email aid users in maintaining their social networks and provide pathways to help when people face big decisions. http://www.pewinternet.org/. Accessed 7 April 2008.
  11. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burch, R. L., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2000). Perceptions of paternal resemblance predict family violence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 429–435.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buss, D. M., Larsen, R., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1128–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203–252.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, Y.-H., Chien, S.-H., Wu, J.-J., & Tsai, P.-Y. (2010). Impact of signals and experience on trust and trusting behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chiou, W.-B., Chen, S. W., & Liao, D.-C. (2013). Does Facebook promote self-interest? Enactment of indiscriminate one-to-many communication on online social networking sites decreases prosocial behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0035.Google Scholar
  20. Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12, 341–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Christophe, V., & Rimé, B. (1997). Exposure to the social sharing of emotion: Emotional impact, listener responses and secondary social sharing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. A. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. doi:10.1089/cybr.2012.0424.Google Scholar
  23. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Evolutionary psychology and family homicide. Science, 242, 519–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Daneback, K., Minsson, S.-A., & Ross, M. W. (2007). Using the Internet to find offline sex partners. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10, 100–107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Delevi, R., & Weisskirch, R. S. (2013). Personality factors as predictors of sexting. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2589–2594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). The alliance hypothesis for human friendship. PLoS ONE, 4, e5802.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Donath, J. (2008). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dooley, J. J., Pyzalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 217, 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dreßing, H., Bailer, J., Anders, A., Wagner, H., & Gallas, C. (2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 17, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Drouin, M., Vogel, K. N., Surbey, A., & Stills, J. R. (2013). Let’s talk about sexting baby: Computer-mediated sexual behaviors among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, A25–A30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Social cognition on the Internet: Testing constraints on social network size. Proceedings from the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences, 367, 2192–2201.Google Scholar
  32. Duncan, L. A., Park, J. H., Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Neuberg, S. L., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Adaptive allocation of attention: Effects of sex and sociosexuality on visual attention to attractive opposite-sex faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 359–364.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. eBay Worldwide. (2013). eBay—the world’s online marketplace. Retrieved November 2013 from http://pages.ebay.co.uk/aboutebay/thecompany/companyoverview.html.
  34. Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implication for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 631–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Facebook Newsroom. (2013). Key facts. Retrieved November 2013 from http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts.
  36. Fehr, E., & Henrich, J. (2003). Is strong reciprocity a maladaptation? On the evolutionary foundations of human altruism. CESifo Working Paper, No. 859. Retrieved February 2015 from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/76253.
  37. Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2013). Social relations and cyberbullying: The influence of individual and structural attributes on victimization and perpetration via the Internet. Human Communication Research, 39, 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frye, N. E., & Dornisch, M. M. (2010). When is trust not enough? The role of perceived privacy of communication tools in comfort with self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1120–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gächter, S., & Falk, A. (2002). Reputation and reciprocity: Consequences for the labor relation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gordon-Messer, D., Bauermeister, J., Grodzinski, A., & Zimmerman, M. (2012). Sexting among young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 301–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.013.
  42. Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A.-M., & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior: I & II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hampton, K. N., Livio, O., & Goulet, L. S. (2010). The social life of wireless urban spaces: Internet use, social networks, and the public realm. Journal of Communication, 60, 701–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006). Psychological adaptations for assessing gossip veracity. Human Nature, 17, 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hill, S. E., Rodeheffer, C. D., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K., & White, A. E. (2012). Boosting beauty in an economic decline: Mating, spending, and the lipstick effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 275–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hollenbaugh, E. E. (2010). Personal journal bloggers: Profiles of disclosiveness. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1657–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Horrigan, J. B. (2008). Online shopping: Internet users like the convenience but worry about the security of their financial information. http://www.pewinternet.org/. Accessed 7 April 2008.
  50. Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self- awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Joinson, A. N., Paine, C. B., Buchanan, T., & Reips, U.-R. (2010). Privacy, trust and self- disclosure online. Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D., & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 21, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kelly, A. E., & McKillop, K. J. (1996). Consequences of revealing personal secrets. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 450–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kelly, A. E., Klusas, J. A., von Weiss, R. T., & Kenny, C. (2001). What is it about revealing secrets that is beneficial? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 651–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, privacy and online social networks. Retrieved from , April 18 2007 Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/.
  56. Ljepava, N., Orr, R. R., Locke, S., & Ross, C. (2013). Personality and social characteristics of Facebook non-users and frequent users. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1602–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marlowe, F. (1999). Male care and mating effort among Hazda foragers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McAndrew, F. T., & Jeong, H. S. (2012). Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2359–2365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McAndrew, F. T., & Milenkovic, M. A. (2002). Of tabloids and family secrets: The evolutionary psychology of gossip. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 1064–1082.Google Scholar
  60. McAndrew, F. T., & Shah, S. S. (2013). Sex differences in jealousy over Facebook activity. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2603–2606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Miller, S. L., & Maner, J. K. (2010). Evolution and relationship maintenance: Fertility cues lead committed men to devalue relationship alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1081–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mok, D., Wellman, B., & Carrasco, J. (2010). Does distance matter in the age of the Internet? Urban Studies, 47, 2747–2783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 441–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Muscanell, N. L., Guadagno, R. E., Rice, L., & Murphy, S. (2013). Don’t it make my brown eyes green? An analysis of Facebook use and romantic jealousy. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2012). Parental mediation of young children’s Internet use. http://111.lse.ac.uk/media%40lse/research/EUKidsOnline/Conference%202011/Nikken.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2013.
  70. Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2008). Social networking profiles: An examination of student attitudes regarding use and appropriateness of content. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11, 95–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Perilloux, C., Easton, J. A., & Buss, D. M. (2012). The misperception of sexual interest. Psychological Science, 23, 146–151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Peters, J., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2002). Understanding domestic violence against women: Using evolutionary psychology to extend the feminist functional analysis. Violence and Victims, 17, 255–264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2013). Online dating and relationships. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Online-Dating/Summary-of-Findings.aspx.
  74. Piazza, J., & Bering, J. M. (2009). Evolutionary cyber-psychology: Applying an evolutionary framework to Internet behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1258–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Piazza, J., & Bering, J. M. (2010). The coevolution of secrecy and stigmatization: Evidence from the content of distressing secrets. Human Nature, 21, 290–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Piazza, J., & DeScioli, P. (2012). Who else knows? The strategic significance of secrets. Poster presented at the Meeting for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  77. Pollet, T. V. (2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Use of social network sites and instant messaging does not lead to increased offline social network size, or to emotionally closer relationships with offline network members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11, 169–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. In M. R. Baye (Ed.), The economics of the Internet and e-commerce (pp. 127–157). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K. (2006). The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experimental Economics, 9, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Roberts, G. (1998). Competitive altruism: From reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of Royal Society London B, 265, 427–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). The costs of family and friends: An 18-month longitudinal study of relationship maintenance and decay. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schiffrin, H., Edelman, A., Falkenstern, M., & Stewart, C. (2010). The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and wellbeing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schneider, B. H. (2000). Friends and enemies: Peer relations in childhood. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  86. Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partner’s infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sheridan, L. P., & Grant, T. (2007). Is cyberstalking different? Crime & Law, 13, 627–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Silk, J. B. (2003). Cooperation without counting: The puzzle of friendship. In P. Hammerstein (Ed.), Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation (pp. 37–54). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  89. Silk, J. B., Kaldor, E., & Boyd, R. (2000). Cheap talk when interests conflict. Animal Behavior, 59, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Solove, D. J. (2007). The future of reputation: Gossip, rumor, and privacy on the Internet. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Spink, A., Koricich, A., Jansen, B. J., & Cole, C. (2004). Sexual information seeking on web search engines. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 65–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Statista. (2013). Number of worldwide active Amazon customer accounts from 2007 to 2012 (in millions). Retrieved November 2013 from http://www.statista.com/statistics/237810/number-of-active-amazon-customer-accounts-worldwide/.
  93. Stefanone, M. A., & Jang, C.-Y. (2007). Writing for friends and family: The interpersonal nature of blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 123–140 (article 7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Steijn, W. M. P., & Schouten, A. P. (2013). Information sharing and relationships on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 16, 582–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stewart-Williams, S. (2007). Altruism among kin vs. nonkin: Effects of cost of help and reciprocal exchange. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sylwester, K., & Roberts, G. (2013). Reputation-based partner choice is an effective alternative to indirect reciprocity in solving social dilemmas. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations. Human Communication Research, 28, 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Friend me or you’ll strain us: Understanding negative events that occur over social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 14, 425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Self-affirmation underlies Facebook use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 321–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Tosun, L. P. (2012). Motives for Facebook use and expressing “true self” on the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1510–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  102. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10, 849–852.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Vasalou, A., Oostveen, A.-M., & Joinson, A. N. (2012). A case study of non-adoption: The values of location tracking in the family. Proceeding of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 779–788.Google Scholar
  105. Viegas, F. B. (2005). Bloggers’ expectations of privacy and accountability: An initial survey. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), (article 12). DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00260.xGoogle Scholar
  106. Vlahovic, T. A., Roberts, S., & Dunbar, R. (2012). Effects of duration and laughter on subjective happiness within different modes of communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 436–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L., & Shulman, H. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wang, R., Bianchi, S. M., & Raley, S. B. (2005). Teenagers’ internet use and family rules: A research note. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1249–1258.Google Scholar
  109. Whitty, M. T. (2003). Cyber-flirting: Playing at love on the internet. Theory & Psychology, 13, 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Whitty, M. T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating: Men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Whitty, M. T. (2007). Revealing the ‘real’ me, searching for the ‘actual’ you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1707–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Whitty, M. T., & Quigley, L. (2008). Emotional and sexual infidelity offline and in cyberspace. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34, 461–468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). An evolutionary psychological perspective on male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Violence and Victims, 8, 271–294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Xue, M., & Silk, J. B. (2012). The role of tracking and tolerance in relationship among friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Yang, B., & Lester, D. (2004). Attitude toward buying online. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 85–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.School of Society, Enterprise, and EnvironmentBath Spa UniversityBathUK

Personalised recommendations