Single-Sentence Readability Prediction in Russian
In an effort to make reading more accessible, an automated readability formula can help students to retrieve appropriate material for their language level. This study attempts to discover and analyze a set of possible features that can be used for single-sentence readability prediction in Russian. We test the influence of syntactic features on predictability of structural complexity. The readability of sentences from SynTagRus corpus was marked up manually and used for evaluation.
KeywordsNatural language processing Text readability prediction Single-sentence readability Syntactic links
This study comprises research findings from the «Adaptation of texts from the Russian National Corpus» for the electronic textbook «Russian language as a foreign one» carried out within The National Research University Higher School of Economics’ Academic Fund Program in 2013, grant No 13-05-0031.
- 2.Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, Jr., R.P., Rogers, R.L., Chissom, B.S.: Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. DTIC Document (1975)Google Scholar
- 3.Chall, J.S.: Readability Revisited: The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula. Brookline Books Cambridge, MA (1995)Google Scholar
- 5.Schwarm, S.E., Ostendorf, M.: Reading level assessment using support vector machines and statistical language models. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 523–530. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.Oborneva, I.: Automatic assessment of the complexity of educational texts on the basis of statistical parameters (2006)Google Scholar
- 7.Krioni, N., Nikin, A., Filippova, A.: Automated system for analysis of the complexity of educational texts. Manag. Soc. Econ. Syst. 11, 101–107 (2008)Google Scholar
- 8.Verhelst, N., Van Avermaet, P., Takala, S., Figueras, N., North, B.: Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching. Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
- 9.Bocharov, V., Stepanova, M., Ostapuk, N., Bichineva, S., Granovsky, D.: Quality assurance tools in the OpenCorpora project. In: Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Technology: Proceeding of the International Conference « Dialog–2011 » , pp. 10–17 (2011)Google Scholar
- 10.Francois, T.L.: Combining a statistical language model with logistic regression to predict the lexical and syntactic difficulty of texts for FFL. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop, pp. 19–27. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Nevdah, M.: Development of a method of automated evaluation of the complexity of educational texts for higher school (2008)Google Scholar
- 13.Nivre, J., Boguslavsky, I.M., Iomdin, L.L.: Parsing the SynTagRus treebank of Russian. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 641–648. Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)Google Scholar