Skip to main content

Users’ Information Search Behavior in a Professional Search Environment:

A Methodological Approach

  • Chapter
Professional Search in the Modern World

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8830))

Abstract

Searching and retrieving information, especially in the context of a professional search environment, can be an arduous task. Professional search is defined as “interactive information retrieval performed by professionals in a specific domain” [1]. These searchers have competencies and skills in searching and as such demand high quality information retrieved and are willing to spend time to find the required information. This chapter aims to analyse research into users’ search behaviors in professional search enviroments. The method of systematic review was adopted and two types of studies were identified “system-centered” and “user-centered” studies. An emphasis was placed on the methods each type of study adopted to meet its purposes. It was found that system-centered studies employed mainly quantitative methods (Log analysis) to evaluate system’s performance and retrieval techniques whereas user-centered studies adopted mainly qualitative methods to provide an insight into users’ behaviors. In addition, system-centered studies examined users’ behavior as a series of clicks, search terms employed and features used to develop systems that satisfy user’s information needs. In contrast, user-centered studies explored users’ behavior with the view to identify the specific search processes, thoughts and decisions made while searching as well as the factors affecting their search behaviors. This chapter contributes to providing an understanding of both the methods and approaches adopted to study users’ behavior in a professional search environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kim, Y., Seo, J., Croft, W.B.: Automatic boolean query suggestion for professional search. In: Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. List, J.: The name of the game: Information seeking in a professional context. In: Lupu, M., Salampasis, M., Fuhr, N., Hanbury, A., Larsen, B., Strindberg, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the Integrating IR Technologies for Professional Search Workshop, Moscow, Russia (March 24, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tucker, V.M.: Acquiring search expertise: learning experiences and threshold concepts. Queensland University of Technology (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koster, C.H.A., Seibert, O., Seutter, M.: The PHASAR search engine. In: Kop, C., Fliedl, G., Mayr, H.C., Métais, E. (eds.) NLDB 2006. LNCS, vol. 3999, pp. 141–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Kohn, A., Bry, F., Manta, A., Ifenthaler, D.: Professional search: Requirements, prototype and preliminary experience report. In: IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet, pp. 195–202 (2008), http://scholar.google.gr/scholar?start=30&q=professional+search&hl=el&as_sdt=0,5#5 , (accessed January 18, 2014)

  6. Lamm, K.: User experiments with search services: methodological challenges for measuring the perceived quality. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Perceptual Quality of Systems, PQS 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tsai, T.H., Chang, H.T.: Surfrom: A community-oriented search engine interface. Appl. Math. 6, 389–396 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Salampasis, M., Giachanou, A., Paltoglou, G.: Multilayer collection selection and search of topically organized patents. Ceur-Ws.org (2013), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-968/irps_9.pdf (accessed January 18, 2014)

  9. Mitra, M., Singhal, A., Buckley, C.: Improving automatic query expansion. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kendrick, T.: The winning mindset Effective competitive intelligence research on the internet. Business Information Review 24, 228–235 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jain, A., Mishne, G.: Organizing query completions for web search. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fafalios, P., Salampasis, M., Tzitzikas, Y.: Exploratory patent search with faceted search and configurable entity mining. Ics.forth.gr (2013). http://www.ics.forth.gr/~fafalios/files/pubs/fafalios_2013_explPatSearch.pdf (accessed January 18, 2014)

  13. Hollink, V., Tsikrika, T., de Vries, A.P.: Semantic search log analysis: a method and a study on professional image search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62, 691–713 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cornacchia, R., Kamps, J.: Searching political data by strategy. In: Proceedings of the Integrating IR technologies for Professional Search Workshop (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cummins, R.: Choosing the right tool for the job: searchbots. The Technology Source (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tan, K.F.: Extending information retrieval system model to improve interactive web searching. Middlesex University (2005), http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/8027/ (accessed January 18, 2014)

  17. Chen, C., Wang, T.: Design and realization of topic search based on transfering of searching engine. Computer Engineering and Design 21, 66 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baram-Tsabari, A., Segev, E.: Just Google it! exploring new web-based tools for identifying public interest in science and pseudoscience. In: Proceedings of the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spink, A., Sollenberger, M.: Elicitation purposes and tasks during mediated information search. Journal of Documentation 60, 77–91 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kitsos, I., Magoutis, K., Tzitzikas, Y.: Scalable entity-based summarization of web search results using MapReduce. Distributed and Parallel Databases 1–42 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Petcu, P., Aps, F., Dragusin, R.: Considerations for the development of task-based search engines. Ceur-Ws.org (2013), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-968/irps_14.pdf (accessed January 18, 2014)

  22. Salampasis, M., Hanbury, A.: A generalized framework for integrated professional search systems. In: Lupu, M., Kanoulas, E., Loizides, F. (eds.) IRFC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8201, pp. 99–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Kohn, A.: Professional search in pharmaceutical research. Munchen, Univ., Diss., Diss. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Turtle, H.: Natural language vs. boolean query evaluation: A comparison of retrieval performance. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Azzopardi, L., Vanderbauwhede, W., Joho, H.: Search system requirements of patent analysts. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hemingway, P.: What is a systematic review? Evidence-based Medicine, 1–8 (April 2009), http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/syst-review.pdf (accessed January18, 2014)

  27. Vibert, N., Ros, C., Bigot, L.L.: Effects of domain knowledge on reference search with the PubMed database: An experimental study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 1423–1447 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Karat, J., Karat, C.: The evolution of user-centered focus in the human- computer interaction field. IBM Syst. J. 42, 532–541 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Borlund, P.: Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation 56, 71–90 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ingwersen, P., Jrvelin, K.: The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context, vol. 18. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ellis, D.: Information seeking behavior. In: Feather, J., Sturges, R. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, pp. 300–301. Routledge, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Paisley, W.: Information needs and uses. ARIST 3, 1–30 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Allen, T.J.: Information needs and uses. ARIST 4, 1–29 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson, T.: On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation 37, 3–15 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Taylor, R.: Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries 29, 178–194 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ingwersen, P.: Search procedures in the library analysed from the cognitive point of view. Journal of Documentation 38, 165–191 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Belkin, N., Brooks, H., Oddy, R.: Ask for information retrieval. Journal of Documentation 38, 61–71 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dervin, B., Nilan, M.: Information needs and uses. ARIST 21, 3–33 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kuhlthau, G.: Inside the search process: information seeking from the users perspective. JASIST 42, 361–371 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ellis, D.: A behavioral model to information retrieval system design. Journal of Information Science 15, 171–212 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jarvelin, K.: On information, information technology and the development of society: An information science perspective. In: Ingwersen, P., Kajberg, L., Pejtersen, A. (eds.) Information Technology and Information Use: Towards a Unified View of Information and Information Technology, pp. 35–55. Taylor Graham, London (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bystrom, K., Jarvelin, K.: Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management 31, 191–214 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, P., White, M.: A cognitive model of document use during a research project: Study II Decisions at the reading and citing stages. JASIS 50, 98–114 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vakkari, P.: A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: A summary and generalization of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation 57, 44–60 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Belkin, N.J., Cool, C., Stein, A., Thiel, U.: Cases, scripts, and information- seeking strategies: on the design of interactive Information Retrieval systems. Expert Systems with Applications 9, 379–395 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ingwersen, P.: Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation 52, 3–50 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Brown, G., Yule, G.: Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Blumer, H.: Sociological analysis and the variable. American Sociological Review 21, 683–690 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Oard, D., Levow, G., Cabezas, C.: TREC-9 experiments at Maryland: Interactive CLIR. In: TREC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Chung, W., Zhang, Y., Huang, Z., Wang, G., Ong, T.-H., Chen, H.: Internet searching and browsing in a multilingual world: An experiment on the Chinese Business Intelligence Portal (CBizPort). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55, 818–831 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Spink, A.: Term relevance feedback and mediated database searching: Implications for information retrieval practice and systems design. Information Processing & Management 31, 161–171 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Spink, A., Goodrum, A., Robins, D.: Elicitation behavior during mediated information retrieval. Information Processing & Management 34, 257–273 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Huurnink, B.: Search in audiovisual broadcast archives (2010), http://dare.uva.nl/record/358972 (accessed January 18, 2014)

  55. Bron, M., Gorp, J., van, N.F., Rijke, M.: de: Exploratory search in an audio-visual archive: Evaluating a professional search tool for non-professional users, pp. 3–6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Karlgren, J.: The CHORUS gap analysis on user-centered methodology for design and evaluation of multi-media information access systems. In: The Second International Workshop on Evaluating Information Access (EVIA 2008), Tokyo, Japan (December 16 , 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Barry, C.L.: User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 45, 149–159 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Spink, A., Goodrum, A.: A study of search intermediary working notes: Implications for IR system design. Information Processing & Management 32, 681–695 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bains, S.: End-user searching at Cranfield University. New Library World 99, 31–40 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Iivonen, M., Sonnenwald, D.H.: From translation to navigation of different discourses: A model of search term selection during the pre-online stage of the search process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49, 312–326 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Patterson, E.S., Woods, D.D., Tinapple, D., Roth, E.M., Finley, J.M., Kuperman, G.G.: Aiding the intelligence analyst in situations of data overload: From problem definition to design concept exploration. Institute for Ergonomics/Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory Report, ERGO-CSEL (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ehrlich, K., Cash, D.: The invisible world of intermediaries: a cautionary tale. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8, 147–167 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Robins, D.: Shifts of focus on various aspects of user information problems during interactive information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, 913–928 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Gschwandtner, M., Kritz, M., Boyer, C.: D8. 1.2: Requirements of the Health Professional Search. Khresmoi Project Public (2011), http://www.khresmoi.eu/assets/Deliverables/WP8/KhresmoiD812.pdf (accessed January 18, 2014)

  65. Jones, R., Rey, B., Madani, O., Greiner, W.: Generating query substitutions. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Spink, A., Wilson, T.D., Ford, N.J., Ellis, D., Foster, A.E.: Information seeking and mediated searching study. Part 3. Successive searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53, 716–727 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vassilakaki, E., Garoufallou, E., Johnson, F., Hartley, R.J. (2014). Users’ Information Search Behavior in a Professional Search Environment:. In: Paltoglou, G., Loizides, F., Hansen, P. (eds) Professional Search in the Modern World. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8830. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12511-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12511-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12510-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12511-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics