Skip to main content

Advances in Photoprotection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 754 Accesses

Abstract

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is widely recognised as the cause of skin cancer in up to 90 % of cases, with skin cancer being the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Ireland (Cancer in Ireland 2013: annual report of the national cancer registry; Chapter 4.1. www.ncri.ie). Skin cancer is therefore a preventable disease for the most part. Strategies to reduce the exposure of UVR will reduce skin cancer risk. This is of particular relevance for pale skin types, who are most susceptible to UVR carcinogenesis and the photoaging effects of the sun. The three pillars of photoprotection are modifying behaviour leading to excess UVR exposure, wearing protective clothing and eyewear and, lastly, using adequate amounts of sunscreen as an adjunct to these protective strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cancer in Ireland 2013: annual report of the national cancer registry. Chapter 4.1. www.ncri.ie.

  2. Forbes PD, Davies RE, Urbach F. Experimental ultraviolet photocarcinogenesis: wavelength interactions and time-dose relationships. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1978;50:31–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. El Ghissassi F, et al. A review of human carcinogens a part D: radiation. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:751–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poon TSC, Barnetson RSC, Halliday GM. Sunlight induced immunosuppression in humans is initially because of UVB, then UVA, followed by interactive effects. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125:840–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Halliday GM, Rana S. Waveband and dose dependency of sunlight-induced immunomodulation and cellular changes. Photochem Photobiol. 2008;84:35–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Young AR, et al. The similarity of action spectra for thymidine dimers in human epidermis and erythema suggests that DNA is the chromophore for erythema. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111(6):982–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leibeling D, Laspe P, Emmett S. Nucleotide excision repair and cancer. J Mol Histol. 2006;37(5–7):225–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yarosh D, et al. Effect of topically applied T4 endonuclease V in liposomes on skin cancer in xeroderma pigmentosum: a randomised study. Xeroderma Pigmentosum Study Group. Lancet. 2001;357(9260):926–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamada M, et al. Aged human skin removes UVB-induced pyrimidine dimers from the epidermis more slowly than younger adult skin in vivo. Arch Dermatol Res. 2006;297(7):294–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Melnikova VO, Ananthaswamy HN. Cellular and molecular events leading to the development of skin cancer. Mutat Res. 2005;571(1–2):91–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher S, Kripke ML. Systemic alteration induced by mice by ultraviolet light irradiation and its relationship to ultraviolet carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977;74(4):1688–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghoreishi M, et al. Tolerance induction by transcutaneous immunisation through ultraviolet a irradiated skin is transferable through CD4+ CD25+ T regulatory cells on host derived IL-10. J Immunol. 2006;176:2635–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy GM, et al. Low dose ultraviolet B irradiation depletes human epidermal langerhans cells. Br J Dermatol. 1993;129(6):674–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vink A, Berg R, de Gruijl F. Detection of thymine dimers in suprabasal and basal cells of chronically UV-B exposed hairless mice. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;100:795–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lembo S, et al. Polymorphic light eruption and skin cancer prevalence: is one protective against the other? Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(6):1342–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McLoone P, et al. An action spectrum for the production of cis-urocanic acid in human skin in vivo. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124(5):1071–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ross JA, et al. Ultraviolet irradiated urocanic acid suppresses delayed-type hypersensitivity to herpes simplex in mice. J Invest Dermatol. 1986;87(5):630–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Norval M. The effect of ultraviolet radiation on human viral infections. Photochem Photobiol. 2006;82(6):1495–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson S, et al. Role of Bak in UV-induced apoptosis in skin cancer and abrogation by HPV E6 proteins. Genes Dev. 2000;14(23):3065–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bedard KM, et al. The E6 oncoproteins from human betapapillomavirus differentially activate telomerase through an E6AP-dependant mechanism and prolong the lifespan of primary keratinocytes. J Virol. 2008;82(8):3894–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen P, et al. Skin cancer in kidney and heart transplant recipients and different long-term immunosuppressive therapy regimens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40(2 Pt 1):177–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berg D, Otley CC. Skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Finsen NR. Om Bekæmpelse af Lupus vulgaris med en Redegørelse for de i Danmark opnaaede Resultater. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandels Forlag; 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jones B, Oh C, Corkery E, Hanley R, Egan C. Attitudes and perceptions regarding skin cancer and sun protection behaviour in an Irish population. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21:1097–101. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02209.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boniol M, et al. Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;345:e4757. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4757. Published 24 July 2012.

  26. The Public Health (Sunbeds) Act (12); 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lowe NJ, et al. Low doses of repetitive UVA induce morphologic changes in human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1995;102(6):739–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Young AR, et al. The detrimental effects of daily sub-erythemal exposure on human skin in vivo can be prevented by a daily-care broad spectrum sunscreen. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:975–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Green A, et al. Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;354(9180):723–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thieden E, et al. Ultraviolet exposure patterns of Irish and Danish gardeners during work and leisure. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153:795–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. WHO Global UV project. http://www.who.into/uv/.

  32. Gamblicher T, Laperre J, Hoffmann K. The European standard for sun protective clothing: EN13758. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:125–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Diffey BL. Sun protection with clothing. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:449–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Citek K. Anti-reflective coatings reflect ultraviolet radiation. Optometry. 2008;79:143–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Roberts JE. Ultraviolet radiation as a risk factor for cataract and macular degeneration. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37(4):246–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Diffey BL, Cheeseman J. Sun protection with hats. Br J Dermatol. 1992;127(1):10–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McKinlay AF, Diffey BL. A reference spectrum for ultraviolet induced erythema on human skin. CIE J. 1987;6:17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  38. AS/NZS. Australian/New Zealand standard. AS/NZS, 604; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  39. The International Organisation for standardisation. Cosmetics-sun protection test methods-in vivo determination of the sun protection factor (SPF). ISO 2010; 24444.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Diffey BL, Grice J. The influence of sunscreen type on photoprotection. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137:103–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nash JF. Human safety and efficacy of ultraviolet filters and sunscreen products. Dermatol Clin. 2006;24:35–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Azurdia RM, et al. Sunscreen application by photosensitive patients is inadequate for protection. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140:255–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Faurschou A, Wolf SC. The relation between sun protection factor and the amount of sunscreen applied in vivo. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156:716–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rice EG. Dihydroxyacetone naphthoquinone protection against photosensitivity. Dermatalogica. 1976;153:38–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Faurschou A, Wulf HC. Durability of the sun protection factor provided by dihydroxyacetone. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2004;20(5):239–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Seite S, Fourtanier AM. The benefit of daily photoprotection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5 Suppl 2):S160–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Naylor MF, et al. High sun protection factor sunscreens in the suppression of actinic neoplasia. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:170–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lautenschlager S, Wulf HC, Pittelkow MR. Photoprotection. Lancet. 2007;370:528–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Morales SV, et al. NMSC: an evaluation of risk in terms of UV exposure. Eur J Epidemiol. 1992;8(6):838–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. American Academy of Dermatology. Facts about sunscreens. Schaumburg, III: American Academy of Dermatology. http://www.aad.org/media/background/factsheets/fact_sunscreen.htm.

  51. Royal D. How to measure UVA protection afforded by sunscreen products. Expert Rev Dermatol. 2008;3(3):307–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillian M. Murphy MD, FRCPI, FRCP, Edin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murphy, G.M., Molloy, O. (2015). Advances in Photoprotection. In: Zwald, F., Brown, M. (eds) Advances in Transplant Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12445-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12445-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12444-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12445-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics