Skip to main content

Understanding Leadership Practices in a Sustainable School Model: A Case from Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Dissatisfaction from the current schooling alternatives has been the basic driver behind the search for an alternative schooling system among parents in Turkey. Being concerned about the quality of available public and private schooling alternatives, a group of parents has initiated an alternative schooling system which is based on different structure, values and goals. The aim of this chapter is to reveal the general features of the so called Another School is Possible (ASIP) movement and the roles and responsibilities of the school principal in creating a sustainable and alternative school system. We used document analysis, observation and interview as sources of data for revealing administrative and academic features of this alternative school system as well as investigating leadership traits and behaviors for accomplishing a sustainable school system. The data suggest that ASIP model is based on four main values including alternative education, democratic management, ecological stance and authentic finance, which guide all administrative, instructional and financial actions at schools. The leadership function is distributed across different constituencies, including the principals, teachers, parents and the students. However, the principal is orchestrating body for realizing a sustained, bottom-up, and successful school model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bahtiyar-Karadeniz, C. (2012). Opinions of teachers towards 4 + 4 + 4 compulsory education system. Education Science Society Journal, 10(40), 34–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBOM. (2015). Principles of ASIP schools. Retrieved from http://www.baskabirokulmumkun.net/principles/?lang=en

  • Beycioglu, K., Sincar, M., Ozer, N., Uğurlu, C. T., & Yıldırım, M. C. (2014). Mapping the terrain of superintendency in Turkey: Structural, institutional and normative features. In A. Nir (Ed.), The educational superintendent: Between trust and regulation: An international perspective (pp. 131–144). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottery, M. (2009). An issue without a history: A consideration of the impact of sustainable development upon school administration. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 41(4), 343–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capozzi, R. (2005). Sowing the seeds: Moving curriculum and school culture towards education for sustainable development. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 7(2), 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., & Stevens, E. (2009). Sustainable leadership in small rural schools: Selected Australian vignettes. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2007). Sustainable leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), Developing sustainable leadership (pp. 11–25). London: Paul Chapman.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engin-Demir, C. (2009). Factors influencing the academic achievement of the Turkish urban poor. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(1), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2006). Leadership and sustainability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Sharratt, L. (2007). Sustaining leadership in complex times: An individual and system solution. In B. Davies (Ed.), Developing sustainable leadership (pp. 116–136). London: Paul Chapman.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Güven, İ. (2007). Recent initiatives in school effectiveness and improvement: The case of Turkey. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (Vol. 17, pp. 363–378). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Güven, İ. (2012). The 4 + 4 + 4 school reform bill and the Fatih Project: Is it a reform? Elementary Education Online, 11(3), 556–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, P. (2005). “Holistic yet tangible”: Embracing the challenge of complexity for education for sustainable development. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 7(2), 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2005). Sustainable leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 173–189). London: Paul Chapman & Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2007). Energizing leadership for sustainability. In B. Davies (Ed.), Developing sustainable leadership (pp. 46–64). London: Paul Chapman.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Lambert, L. (2003). Building leadership capacity for school. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. L. (2005). From self-sufficiency to personal and family sustainability: A new paradigm for social policy. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 32(4), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, C., & McKeown, R. (2001). Education for sustainable development: Past experience, present action and future prospects. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(2), 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İnal, K. (2012). The AKP’s logic of reform and its critical politico-ideological analysis in terms of new noncontinuous education law. Education Science Society Journal, 10(39), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, K. A., & Jenkins, B. A. (2005). Education for sustainable development and the question of balance: Lessons from the Pacific. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 7(2), 114–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondakci, Y., & Sivri, H. (2014). Salient characteristics of high-performing Turkish elementary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(2), 254–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, L. G. (2007). Lasting leadership: Toward sustainable school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learning to Change. (2004, May 4–7). Learning to change our world. International consultation on education for sustainable development, Gothenburg. Retrieved from www.learning2004.se

  • MONE. (2009). Öğretim programlarının yenilenme gerekçeleri ve davranışçı yaklaşım ile yapılandırmacı yaklaşım arasındaki farklar. [PowerPoint slides]. Retriewed from http://www.ogm.meb.gov.tr/belgeler/program_yaklasim.ppt

  • OECD PISA. (2015). Key findings. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/

  • OECD. (2016). Public spending on education (indicator). doi: 10.1787/f99b45d0-en.

  • Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIMSS & PIRLS. (2015). [International Database]. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/

  • TUIK. (2015a). Population statistics. Retrieved from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1059

  • TUIK. (2015b). Education statistics. Retrieved from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1018

  • UNESCO. (1997). Educating for a sustainable future: A transdisciplinary vision for concerted action. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001106/110686eo.pdf

  • United Nations. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development. General Assembly Resolution 42/187. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42-187.htm

  • Zachariou, A., Kadji-Beltran, C., & Manoli, C. C. (2013). School principals’ professional development in the framework of sustainable schools in Cyprus: A matter of refocusing. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 712–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaşar Kondakçı .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beycioglu, K., Kondakçı, Y. (2017). Understanding Leadership Practices in a Sustainable School Model: A Case from Turkey. In: Papa, R., Saiti, A. (eds) Building for a Sustainable Future in Our Schools. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12403-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12403-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12402-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12403-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics