Ethics, Sustainability, and Water Management: A Canadian Case Study

Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

This paper argues that values, perceptions, and attitudes affect decision making in water management and that a better understanding of water ethics will ensure more reliable management practices. A Canadian case study, focusing on the City of Toronto’s Biosolids and Residuals Master Plan (BRMP), illustrates the importance of values in water management practices. In 2007, the author served as one of a seven member expert peer review panel to evaluate the model used by consultants to recommend biosolids management upgrades at each of the city’s four wastewater treatment plants. Both the decision-making model as well as community reactions to the model and master plan revealed value judgments that ultimately affected the management process and implementation of recommendations over recent years.

Keywords

Ethics Values in sustainability Biosolids and water management Perceptions and attitudes in decision making 

References

  1. AECOM Canada Ltd (2009) City of Toronto biosolids master plan update. Brampton, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchamp T (2005) The nature of applied ethics. In: Frey RG, Wellman CH (eds) A companion to applied ethics. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentham J (1970) Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown P, Schmidt J (2010) An ethic of compassionate retreat. In: Brown P, Schmidt J (eds) Water ethics: foundational readings for students and professionals. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Calicott J (2005) The intrinsic value of nature in public policy: the case of the endangered species act. In: Cohen A, Wellman C (eds) Contemporary debates in applied ethics. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  6. City of Toronto (2013) Toronto’s wastewater treatment plants. http://www.toronto.ca/water/wastewater_treatment/treatment_plants/index.htm. Accessed on 26 June 2013
  7. City of Toronto (2009) Responsible choices. http://www.toronto.ca/wes/techservices/involved/wws/biosolids/pdf/newsletter/brmp_6_newsletter.pdf. Accessed on 25 June 2013
  8. City of Toronto (2012) Toronto’s racial diversity. http://www.toronto.ca/toronto_facts/diversity.htm. Accessed on 24 June 2013
  9. City of Toronto (2008) Staff report on the biosolids and residuals master plan peer review panel report. Submitted by Toronto Water to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2008/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-13879.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2013
  10. Ehl Harrison Consulting Inc (EHC), Genivar (2008) City of Toronto biosolids and residuals master plan decision making model peer reviewGoogle Scholar
  11. Gido J, Clements J (2012) Successful project management. South-Western Cengage Learning, MasonGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinman L (2013) Ethics: a pluralistic approach to moral theory. Wadsworth, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Hillson D, Murray-Webster R (2005) Understanding and managing risk attitude. Gower Publishing Company, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Johns C, Rasmussen K (2008) Institutions for water resource management in Canada. In: Sproule-Jones M, Johns C, Heinmiller B (eds) Canadian water politics: conflicts and institutions. McGill-Queen’s University Press, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  15. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Kerzner H (2001) Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling, 7th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. KMK Consultants Limited, in Association with Black and Veatch Canada and Cantox Environmental Inc (2004) City of Toronto biosolids and residual master plan. City of Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  18. Lessard C, Lessard J (2007) Project management for engineering design. Morgan and Claypool, San RafaelGoogle Scholar
  19. Mill JS (1863) Utilitarianism. Longmans, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Morito B (2010) Ethics of climate change: adopting an empirical approach to moral concern. Hum Ecol Rev 17(2):106–116Google Scholar
  21. Osinga I (2011) City of Toronto biosolids and residuals master plan decision-making model peer review. In: Proceedings of the residuals and biosolids 2011 conference. Water Environment Federation (WEF), Alexandria, VAGoogle Scholar
  22. Statistics Canada (2012) Population projections for Canada, the provinces and the territories. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/91-520-x/2010001/aftertoc-aprestdm1-eng.htm. Accessed 24 June 2013
  23. Stefanovic I (2012) To build or not to build: how do we honour the landscape through thoughtful decision making? Minding Nat 5(1):12–18Google Scholar
  24. United Nations (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision highlights. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.http://esa.un.org/unup/pdf/WUP2011_Highlights.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2013
  25. Vynak C (2008) Biosolids a ‘disaster waiting to happen’. The Toronto star. http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2008/07/13/biosolids_a_disaster_waiting_to_happen.html. Accessed 19 Sept 2013

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EnvironmentSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations