Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Internet and Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thinking Skills for the Digital Generation

Abstract

This chapter presents the current debate around the role of the Internet in thinking. It subsequently articulates historical and conceptual faults associated with this debate and describes the symbiotic relationship among technology and humans. The chapter also clarifies what it means to be “smarter” in the age of information and identifies ways in which technology can interact with the human mind to better aid human performance. Finally, the chapter presents the current state of research on the impact of the Internet on processes related to reading, attention, multi-tasking, and decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(1), 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alzahabi, R., & Becker, M. (2013). The association between media multitasking, task-switching, and dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 39(5), 1485–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). The brain in your pocket: Evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, N. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budson, A. E., & Price, B. G. (2005). Memory dysfunction. England Journal of Medicine, 352(7), 692–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, N. (2010, May 24). The web shatters focus, rewires brains. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2010/05/ff_nicholas_carr

  • Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIBER. (2008). Information behavior of the researcher of the future. Retrieved from http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140614113419/ http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf

  • Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Derry, J. (2005). We have met technology and it is us. In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 209–228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Sense Media. (2012). Entertainment media diets of children and adolescents may impact learning. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/about-us/news/press-releases/entertainment-media-diets-of-children-and-adolescents-may-impact#

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens. Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, N. (2007). The Brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge. (2010). How is the Internet changing the way YOU think? Retrieved from http://edge.org/annual-question/how-is-the-internet-changing-the-way-you-think

  • Greenfield, P. (1972). Oral and written language: The consequences for cognitive development in Africa, the United States and England. Language and Speech, 15, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S. (2015). Minds change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabr, F. (2013, April 11). The reading brain in the digital age: The science of paper versus screens. Scientific American. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/

  • Kellogg, R. T., & Mueller, S. (1993). Performance amplification and process restructuring in computer-based writing. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konnikova, M. (2014, July 16). Being a better online reader. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/being-a-better-online-reader

  • Lajoie, S. P. (2005). Cognitive tools for the mind: The promises of technology—Cognitive amplifiers or bionic prosthetics? In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 87–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitsch, H. J. (2013). Memory and self: Neuroscientific landscape. ISRN Neuroscience, 13, Article ID 176027. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/176027

  • Maynard, A. E., Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. (2005). Technology and the development of intelligence: From the loom to the computer. In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 29–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesulam, M. (1998). From sensation to cognition. Brain, 121, 1013–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. D. (2014). Minds online: Teaching effectively with technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myrberg, C., & Wiberg, N. (2015). Screen vs. paper: What is the difference for reading and learning? Insights, 28(2), 49–54. doi:http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.236. http://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/uksg.236/

  • Naughton, J. (2010, August 14). The Internet: Is it changing the way we think? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/aug/15/internet-brain-neuroscience-debate

  • Nickerson, R. S. (2005). Technology and cognition amplification. In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 3–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 88–110). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumridge, N. (2013). Is the internet destroying our attention span? Retrieved from http://psychminds.com/is-the-internet-destroying-our-attentions-span/

  • Poldrack, R., & Sendak, R. (2004). Introduction to this special issue: The cognitive neuroscience of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(3), 199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., Friedrich, L., Jacklin, A., … Zickuhr, K. (2012). How teens do research in the digital world. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from, http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/11/01/how-teens-do-research-in-the-digital-world/

  • Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. The New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J., & Clark, J. J. (2000). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions. Visual Cognition, 7(1–3), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenwald, M. (2014, April 6). Serious reading takes a hit from online scanning and skimming, researchers say. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/serious-reading-takes-a-hit-from-online-scanning-and-skimming-researchers-say/2014/04/06/088028d2-b5d2-11e3-b899-20667de76985_story.html

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (2005). Do technologies make us smarter? Intellectual amplification which, of, and through technology. In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 71–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, G., & Vorgon, G. (2008). iBrain: Surviving the technological alteration of the modern mind. New York: Harpers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2007). Cognitive psychology: Mind and brain. New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wener, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333, 776–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, T. (2012, April 24). Does the Internet rewire your brain? Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120424-does-the-internet-rewire-brains

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Preiss, D. D. (2005). Preface. In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. xiii–xxii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psyhology, 9(1), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, L. (2015, May 15). Humans have sorter attention span than goldfish, thanks to smartphones. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11607315/Humans-have-shorter-attention-span-than-goldfish-thanks-to-smartphones.html

  • Wellmon, C. (2012). Why Google isn’t making us stupid or smart. The Hedgehog Review, 2012, 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. T. (2015). For the love of reading: Engaging students in a lifelong pursuit. American Educator, 39(1), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., & Chen, S. C. (2011). Graduate students’ usage of and attitudes towards e-books: Experiences from Taiwan. Program, 45(3), 294–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarkoni, T., Speer, N., Balota, D., McAvoy, M., & Zacks, J. (2008). Pictures of a thousand words: Investigating the neural mechanisms of reading with extremely rapid event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 42(2), 973–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zickuhr, K., Rainie, L., Purcell, K., Madden, M., & Brenner, J. (2012). Younger Americans’ reading and library habits. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pennsylvania – Perelman School of Medicine and Thomas Jefferson University – Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Balu H. Athreya (Professor Emeritus of Pediatrics, Teaching Consultant)

  2. Nemours- A.I.duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA

    Balu H. Athreya (Professor Emeritus of Pediatrics, Teaching Consultant)

  3. School of Education, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

    Chrystalla Mouza

Authors
  1. Balu H. Athreya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chrystalla Mouza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Athreya, B.H., Mouza, C. (2017). Internet and Thinking. In: Thinking Skills for the Digital Generation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12364-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12364-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12363-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12364-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation